New York Law School strikes back Forum
- MTal
- Posts: 852
- Joined: Tue Dec 11, 2007 6:47 pm
New York Law School strikes back
"In a motion to dismiss the complaint filed Thursday, the law school said the plaintiffs relied on "broad generalities" instead of concrete facts to back up their claims that the school massaged its post-graduation statistics to lure prospective students."
http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.co ... job_rates/
Personally I believe the plaintiffs laid out a good case and the motion will be denied.
http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.co ... job_rates/
Personally I believe the plaintiffs laid out a good case and the motion will be denied.
- MrPapagiorgio
- Posts: 1740
- Joined: Sat Feb 13, 2010 2:36 am
Re: New York Law School strikes back
And your long tenure in law school helped you come to that conclusion? Just kidding brother.MTal wrote:"In a motion to dismiss the complaint filed Thursday, the law school said the plaintiffs relied on "broad generalities" instead of concrete facts to back up their claims that the school massaged its post-graduation statistics to lure prospective students."
http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.co ... job_rates/
Personally I believe the plaintiffs laid out a good case and the motion will be denied.
Seriously though, quite interested to see how this turns out. Thanks for posting.
-
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:17 pm
Re: New York Law School strikes back
"New York Law School strikes back?"
Every Defendant always files a motion to dismiss alleging the Plaintiff has failed to present a case... This is a typical, mechanical response.
Every Defendant always files a motion to dismiss alleging the Plaintiff has failed to present a case... This is a typical, mechanical response.
- Kess
- Posts: 394
- Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 12:26 pm
Re: New York Law School strikes back
+1scammedhard wrote:"New York Law School strikes back?"
Every Defendant always files a motion to dismiss alleging the Plaintiff has failed to present a case... This is a typical, mechanical response.
Nothing worth mentioning here.
- theadvancededit
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 1:31 pm
Re: New York Law School strikes back
+2scammedhard wrote:"New York Law School strikes back?"
Every Defendant always files a motion to dismiss alleging the Plaintiff has failed to present a case... This is a typical, mechanical response.
Standard motion practice, especially when billable hours are involved.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Opie
- Posts: 1353
- Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2011 1:27 pm
Re: New York Law School strikes back
Yeah, why would you not file a motion to dismiss? Should I bill my client to file a largely prewritten motion I could do in my sleep and possibly win this case without ever going to court? Sure, why not.theadvancededit wrote:+2scammedhard wrote:"New York Law School strikes back?"
Every Defendant always files a motion to dismiss alleging the Plaintiff has failed to present a case... This is a typical, mechanical response.
Standard motion practice, especially when billable hours are involved.
-
- Posts: 3311
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: New York Law School strikes back
Or write a poor one knowing it will be denied so you can go to trial and bill even more hours.Opie wrote: Yeah, why would you not file a motion to dismiss? Should I bill my client to file a largely prewritten motion I could do in my sleep and possibly win this case without ever going to court? Sure, why not.
- paratactical
- Posts: 5885
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm
Re: New York Law School strikes back
lolololol @ MtD being largely prewritten.
-
- Posts: 163
- Joined: Fri Oct 15, 2010 2:19 am
Re: New York Law School strikes back
I'm just stunned that MTal has stuck around for 4 years.
- JCougar
- Posts: 3216
- Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:47 pm
Re: New York Law School strikes back
Everyone I've talked to basically says they're all the same.paratactical wrote:lolololol @ MtD being largely prewritten.
- BiglawOrBust
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:11 pm
Re: New York Law School strikes back
All right! Show's over, folks. Move along now.scammedhard wrote:"New York Law School strikes back?"
Every Defendant always files a motion to dismiss alleging the Plaintiff has failed to present a case... This is a typical, mechanical response.
-
- Posts: 1610
- Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 9:08 pm
Re: New York Law School strikes back
How is "we just did what the ABA told us to" a defense?
I stole that candy bar, but EVERYONE was stealing candy bars!
I stole that candy bar, but EVERYONE was stealing candy bars!
- theadvancededit
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 1:31 pm
Re: New York Law School strikes back
Conference, conference, conference.minnbills wrote:Or write a poor one knowing it will be denied so you can go to trial and bill even more hours.Opie wrote: Yeah, why would you not file a motion to dismiss? Should I bill my client to file a largely prewritten motion I could do in my sleep and possibly win this case without ever going to court? Sure, why not.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 10:45 pm
Re: New York Law School strikes back
It makes my stomach turn just to read this (= ).minnbills wrote:Or write a poor one knowing it will be denied so you can go to trial and bill even more hours.Opie wrote: Yeah, why would you not file a motion to dismiss? Should I bill my client to file a largely prewritten motion I could do in my sleep and possibly win this case without ever going to court? Sure, why not.
-
- Posts: 3311
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: New York Law School strikes back
Are you upset by jokes Kim?
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 10:45 pm
Re: New York Law School strikes back
Only jokes with a nuance of sad and disturbing reality.minnbills wrote:Are you upset by jokes Kim?
-
- Posts: 1304
- Joined: Thu Nov 26, 2009 1:08 am
Re: New York Law School strikes back
lol, like 3/4 of the talk in this thread is massively confused. MTD's are indeed routine (so yes, there's nothing special about the mere fact of one being filed), but they are far from mechanical. In fact they are a crucial stage in litigation and are often heavily researched because they decide whether various claims in the lawsuit remain or get knocked out -- this means (1) if you're the defendant and you get all or most of the substantive claims knocked out, you've won, (2) if you're the plai and enough of your claims survive, you have good leverage to push a settlement, and (3) their results will shape the amount and kind of discovery taken, which has huge bearing on the cost of the litigation.
Also, the thing above about deliberately filing a bad motion to dismiss -- highly unlikely.
Also, the thing above about deliberately filing a bad motion to dismiss -- highly unlikely.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- paratactical
- Posts: 5885
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm
Re: New York Law School strikes back
Filing an intentionally bad MtD would be hard to prove, but if you could those sanctions would be bonkers.
Also, if you're doing canned MtDs, you're doing something crazy to be sued by enough people singularly to get that many cases. The law might be routine, but the supporting shit, especially well composed statements of facts, should be meticulously composed and quite time consuming. The last MtD I did was a fucking opus of a paper and handily rid the firm's clients of an obviously pesky and inappropriate suit, but it still took time to put together.
Also, if you're doing canned MtDs, you're doing something crazy to be sued by enough people singularly to get that many cases. The law might be routine, but the supporting shit, especially well composed statements of facts, should be meticulously composed and quite time consuming. The last MtD I did was a fucking opus of a paper and handily rid the firm's clients of an obviously pesky and inappropriate suit, but it still took time to put together.
- romothesavior
- Posts: 14692
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm
Re: New York Law School strikes back
I still think you should go to law school. You would be so much better at being a lawyer than most of us.paratactical wrote:Filing an intentionally bad MtD would be hard to prove, but if you could those sanctions would be bonkers.
Also, if you're doing canned MtDs, you're doing something crazy to be sued by enough people singularly to get that many cases. The law might be routine, but the supporting shit, especially well composed statements of facts, should be meticulously composed and quite time consuming. The last MtD I did was a fucking opus of a paper and handily rid the firm's clients of an obviously pesky and inappropriate suit, but it still took time to put together.
- paratactical
- Posts: 5885
- Joined: Wed Feb 04, 2009 1:06 pm
Re: New York Law School strikes back
I'm too smart for that racket, jabroni. In ten years, I'll be the admin manager of a firm and raking it in.
-
- Posts: 789
- Joined: Wed Feb 23, 2011 3:12 pm
Re: New York Law School strikes back
THANKS FOR YOU OPINION BRO!MTal wrote:"In a motion to dismiss the complaint filed Thursday, the law school said the plaintiffs relied on "broad generalities" instead of concrete facts to back up their claims that the school massaged its post-graduation statistics to lure prospective students."
http://newsandinsight.thomsonreuters.co ... job_rates/
Personally I believe the plaintiffs laid out a good case and the motion will be denied.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- BiglawOrBust
- Posts: 215
- Joined: Tue Aug 30, 2011 2:11 pm
Re: New York Law School strikes back
Someone's going into PIKimberly wrote:It makes my stomach turn just to read this (= ).minnbills wrote:Or write a poor one knowing it will be denied so you can go to trial and bill even more hours.Opie wrote: Yeah, why would you not file a motion to dismiss? Should I bill my client to file a largely prewritten motion I could do in my sleep and possibly win this case without ever going to court? Sure, why not.
- theadvancededit
- Posts: 315
- Joined: Sun Aug 28, 2011 1:31 pm
Re: New York Law School strikes back
Hahaha, PI motions are the fan fiction of the legal universe.BiglawOrBust wrote:Someone's going into PIKimberly wrote:It makes my stomach turn just to read this (= ).minnbills wrote:Or write a poor one knowing it will be denied so you can go to trial and bill even more hours.Opie wrote: Yeah, why would you not file a motion to dismiss? Should I bill my client to file a largely prewritten motion I could do in my sleep and possibly win this case without ever going to court? Sure, why not.
-
- Posts: 119
- Joined: Sat Jul 23, 2011 10:45 pm
Re: New York Law School strikes back
BiglawOrBust wrote:Someone's going into PIKimberly wrote:It makes my stomach turn just to read this (= ).minnbills wrote:Or write a poor one knowing it will be denied so you can go to trial and bill even more hours.Opie wrote: Yeah, why would you not file a motion to dismiss? Should I bill my client to file a largely prewritten motion I could do in my sleep and possibly win this case without ever going to court? Sure, why not.
Haaaahaaaa. Nice guess. In all of my outrageous optimism, I would be suited for it.... but I got other plans...
-
- Posts: 3311
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: New York Law School strikes back
So you're a sellout like the rest of us?
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login