Traffic Violation
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 1:45 am
Traffic Violation
I am filling out an application and it asks for misdemeanor convictions other then speeding tickets. When I was 16 I was cited for a moving violation (non-speeding) and paid the fine. No drinking, drugs etc. Is this something that would still be on my record now that I am an adult? Do I disclose?
-
- Posts: 325
- Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 11:37 pm
Re: Traffic Violation
A moving violation is basically like a speeding ticket lol. I never reported mine and I'm in GW.
- straxen
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2009 3:39 am
Re: Traffic Violation
Follow the letter of what you're asked. If the app only asks for criminal convictions (e.g. felonies & misdemeanors, not infractions) and your citation was only an infraction, or if it says something like minor traffic violations are excluded, you're probably ok not disclosing. Otherwise, if it only says omit "speeding" violations and it wasn't a speeding violation, then I'd probably disclose with a very short note to be on the safe side. Nobody's going to care, might as well include if it's not clear whether or not it's included by the language of the disclosure request. Whether it's still on your record or not is almost certainly immaterial unless you're told you can exclude matters that have been sealed or expunged.
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 1:45 am
Re: Traffic Violation
straxen wrote:Follow the letter of what you're asked. If the app only asks for criminal convictions (e.g. felonies & misdemeanors, not infractions) and your citation was only an infraction, or if it says something like minor traffic violations are excluded, you're probably ok not disclosing. Otherwise, if it only says omit "speeding" violations and it wasn't a speeding violation, then I'd probably disclose with a very short note to be on the safe side. Nobody's going to care, might as well include if it's not clear whether or not it's included by the language of the disclosure request. Whether it's still on your record or not is almost certainly immaterial unless you're told you can exclude matters that have been sealed or expunged.
Thank you thank you. That was sort of what I thought. Would something like this be adequate?
" In 2007 I was cited for a "failure to yield" moving violation. I was 16 at the time and promptly paid the fine."
- kalvano
- Posts: 11952
- Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 2:24 am
Re: Traffic Violation
That's perfect. No one will care at all about it.
- lovejopd
- Posts: 544
- Joined: Tue Dec 01, 2009 1:00 pm
Re: Traffic Violation
What about the parking Ticket any idea?


- birdlaw117
- Posts: 2167
- Joined: Thu Sep 16, 2010 12:19 am
Re: Traffic Violation
lovejopd wrote:What about the parking Ticket any idea?
Full disclosure is always required for parking tickets.
-
- Posts: 68
- Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 1:45 am
Re: Traffic Violation
So is the disclosure supposed to be an addendum? Do title I it as " Character and Fitness Disclosure" or just say "addenda" and have it under that? anyone know? Thanks in advance
- neeko
- Posts: 942
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 3:41 pm
Re: Traffic Violation
oregon000 wrote:So is the disclosure supposed to be an addendum? Do title I it as " Character and Fitness Disclosure" or just say "addenda" and have it under that? anyone know? Thanks in advance
I didn't title mine, I just put the question numbers and attached them to the character and fitness section. Whether this is the right way to do it, I am not sure.
Return to “Law School Admissions Forum�
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider] and 9 guests