I have a 3.81 and a 155 on the LSAT (I'm retaking in October), where can I go? What would I have to get to get a full ride at one of the lower ranked law schools?
Thanks!
Reverse splitter looking to go to law school in Chicago
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 11:23 am
-
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 3:22 pm
Re: Reverse splitter looking to go to law school in Chicago
NeedtoStudy wrote:I have a 3.81 and a 155 on the LSAT (I'm retaking in October), where can I go? What would I have to get to get a full ride at one of the lower ranked law schools?
Thanks!
No prob at JMLS. I imagine your asking about Kent/loyola/depaul. But from the title I thought you meant UC.
- vanwinkle
- Posts: 8954
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
Re: Reverse splitter looking to go to law school in Chicago
There's no such thing as a "reverse splitter", just people who do badly on the LSAT. Study and retake, and then worry about it.
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 11:23 am
Re: Reverse splitter looking to go to law school in Chicago
lawgod wrote:NeedtoStudy wrote:I have a 3.81 and a 155 on the LSAT (I'm retaking in October), where can I go? What would I have to get to get a full ride at one of the lower ranked law schools?
Thanks!
No prob at JMLS. I imagine your asking about Kent/loyola/depaul. But from the title I thought you meant UC.
I'd be shocked if I got lower than a 160 in October, I have a pretty good excuse for doing worse on the actual thing than I did on my initial diagnostic. But you'd say that I already have a full-ride there? It's not saying a lot, I would just like to know that I pretty much have a free ride somewhere.
-
- Posts: 465
- Joined: Mon Dec 28, 2009 3:22 pm
Re: Reverse splitter looking to go to law school in Chicago
NeedtoStudy wrote:lawgod wrote:NeedtoStudy wrote:I have a 3.81 and a 155 on the LSAT (I'm retaking in October), where can I go? What would I have to get to get a full ride at one of the lower ranked law schools?
Thanks!
No prob at JMLS. I imagine your asking about Kent/loyola/depaul. But from the title I thought you meant UC.
I'd be shocked if I got lower than a 160 in October, I have a pretty good excuse for doing worse on the actual thing than I did on my initial diagnostic. But you'd say that I already have a full-ride there? It's not saying a lot, I would just like to know that I pretty much have a free ride somewhere.
Oh. I didn't see the part about full ride. sorry.
Personally, I don't think JMLS is worth attending even on full ride, when you could be working on a career in something else.
-
- Posts: 38
- Joined: Tue Jul 05, 2011 11:23 am
Re: Reverse splitter looking to go to law school in Chicago
I think that's fair to say. Tons of grads are SA's, but even that is rapidly changing.
Return to “Law School Admissions Forum�
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests