Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects Forum
- Knock
- Posts: 5151
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects
Good stuff, thanks for sharing.
- nOO law
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Fri Apr 23, 2010 11:31 am
Re: Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects
DoubleChecks wrote:tl;dr -- nonOO law wrote:romothesavior wrote:No, actually it's not. That'd be like reading an article talking about some breakthrough in evolutionary biology and saying, "Ugh, evolution is so old news. This is like beating a dead horse!"powerlawyer06 wrote:The reason why I am underwhelmed by the article is because I feel like every TLS user has heard this one million times. We are all more informed than the average law school applicant. I feel like this is a dead horse we are beating.
Posting another "law schools lie" article on TLS is like going into a christian church and saying "Have you guys heard about this Jesus guy?"
I'm probably one of the most pessimistic on TLS re: job prospects for law students, and these numbers even shock (and scare) me. I knew that high paying jobs are scarce. I've knew that legal employment is tough. But 50% of law school graduates or less getting real, full-time legal jobs? That's pretty crazy. Also, yes, the article's main conclusion (law schools number fudge) isn't new. But it does a better job of showing how than I've seen before, and it also does a really good job of breaking apart the most recent NALP data.
So while you're right that this is an old subject of conversation around here, it is a new perspective with some new numbers, so it is not at all beating a dead horse.
So tl;dr... Are you calling this article a breakthrough?
Just glancing over the numbers they don't seem as bad as I thought. 200 law schools and 45000 grads ~50-60% isn't a bad number. Also, aren't these percentages similar or even substantially better than other professional schools (not medical).
- ThomasMN
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 3:38 pm
Re: Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects
Also, I think there could be an argument made that no employment in big law is truly "permanent."
- Knock
- Posts: 5151
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects
That's not how they were using the word "permanent," as they explicitly said in the article.ThomasMN wrote:Also, I think there could be an argument made that no employment in big law is truly "permanent."
- ThomasMN
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 3:38 pm
Re: Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects
I am a little curious how much of the unemployment and non-legal employment is brought about because the law school graduate failed the bar exam.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- ThomasMN
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 3:38 pm
Re: Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects
I was trying to make a somewhat dry joke.Knock wrote:That's not how they were using the word "permanent," as they explicitly said in the article.ThomasMN wrote:Also, I think there could be an argument made that no employment in big law is truly "permanent."
- Knock
- Posts: 5151
- Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 3:09 pm
Re: Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects
Probably none. If someone failed the bar exam, there are thousands of qualified graduates available to fill the job.ThomasMN wrote:I am a little curious how much of the unemployment and non-legal employment is brought about because the law school graduate failed the Bar exam.
-
- Posts: 886
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 6:08 pm
Re: Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects
I think they get put in the "Unemployed, not seeking employment" category.ThomasMN wrote:I am a little curious how much of the unemployment and non-legal employment is brought about because the law school graduate failed the Bar exam.
- DoubleChecks
- Posts: 2328
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm
Re: Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects
wait what? ~50-60% chance of not having a full time legal job after dumping 3 yrs and $150k-200k in tuitions is not a bad number? lol man vegas roulette for you son! i vote EVENS (30/70 split if you win it).nOO law wrote:
Just glancing over the numbers they don't seem as bad as I thought. 200 law schools and 45000 grads ~50-60% isn't a bad number. Also, aren't these percentages similar or even substantially better than other professional schools (not medical).
- ThomasMN
- Posts: 298
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2010 3:38 pm
Re: Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects
There is a big difference. If say, 20% of law school graduates across the board failed the bar exam that would set a base level of "non-legal" employment at 20%. Therefore, it would mean that the percentage of people we are really worried about, law school graduates who can practice law, who don't have legal employment is actually smaller than %50.Knock wrote:Probably none. If someone failed the bar exam, there are thousands of qualified graduates available to fill the job.ThomasMN wrote:I am a little curious how much of the unemployment and non-legal employment is brought about because the law school graduate failed the Bar exam.
-
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:17 pm
Re: Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects
Less than 50% chance of landing a legal job... This is beyond AWFUL. Where has the ABA been? They should get fired. They should lose the right to accredit law schools.
- Strange
- Posts: 740
- Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2011 5:23 am
Re: Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects
I'm well aware this isn't news especially to the regulars on this forum, so the sarcasm wasn't needed. It's a recent article about something that affects all of us with some new information. It came up on my blogroll so I thought I'd post it
-
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:17 pm
Re: Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects
No. This is far, far worse than I expected. I thought I was being pessimistic, but now I realize that I was being too optimistic.Strange wrote:I'm well aware this isn't news especially to the regulars on this forum, so the sarcasm wasn't needed. It's a recent article about something that affects all of us with some new information. It came up on my blogroll so I thought I'd post it
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 886
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 6:08 pm
Re: Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects
TBF, 2010 data is expected to be the worst data of all.
Also, what exactly do you propose the ABA does? If they just shut down schools and take away accreditation they run into anti-trust issues.
Also, what exactly do you propose the ABA does? If they just shut down schools and take away accreditation they run into anti-trust issues.
-
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:17 pm
Re: Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects
I don't see/hear the AMA, APA, ADA, or other prefessional organzitions running into anti-trust issues.aliarrow wrote:TBF, 2010 data is expected to be the worst data of all.
Also, what exactly do you propose the ABA does? If they just shut down schools and take away accreditation they run into anti-trust issues.
The ABA should FORCE schools to release accurate and honest employment data and have the data audited regulalry. They should also raise the bar passage standards and close down schools that have awful attrition rates, like Cooley, Jefferson, Barry, and half the other TTTs. I see no anti-trust issues there. Just preventing stupid people from being scammed.
- JusticeHarlan
- Posts: 1516
- Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:56 pm
Re: Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects
This seems to assume that TLS users are a monolithic block, rather than a group whose membership fluctuates - new posters arrive here all the time. If we didn't post things like this article from time to time, people lurking on the site might not get the benefit of the knowledge that longer tenured users have about the situation and just assume law schools aren't juking the stats. I see it as a good thing that threads like this keep popping up, especially when there are new articles (rather than 9 threads about that one NYT article).powerlawyer06 wrote:The reason why I am underwhelmed by the article is because I feel like every TLS user has heard this one million times. We are all more informed than the average law school applicant. I feel like this is a dead horse we are beating.
Posting another "law schools lie" article on TLS is like going into a christian church and saying "Have you guys heard about this Jesus guy?"
-
- Posts: 886
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 6:08 pm
Re: Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects
You have to take into consideration that the ABA doesn't deal with reasonable benign organizations and people, they deal with lawyers.scammedhard wrote:I don't see/hear the AMA, APA, ADA, or other prefessional organzitions running into anti-trust issues.aliarrow wrote:TBF, 2010 data is expected to be the worst data of all.
Also, what exactly do you propose the ABA does? If they just shut down schools and take away accreditation they run into anti-trust issues.
The ABA should FORCE schools to release accurate and honest employment data and have the data audited regulalry. They should also raise the bar passage standards and close down schools that have awful attrition rates, like Cooley, Jefferson, Barry, and half the other TTTs. I see no anti-trust issues there. Just preventing stupid people from being scammed.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 886
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 6:08 pm
Re: Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects
I agree, it does just get somewhat annoying seeing the same things brought up as if its breaking news, but I completely see the need for it to be brought up again every couple weeks.JusticeHarlan wrote:This seems to assume that TLS users are a monolithic block, rather than a group whose membership fluctuates - new posters arrive here all the time. If we didn't post things like this article from time to time, people lurking on the site might not get the benefit of the knowledge that longer tenured users have about the situation and just assume law schools aren't juking the stats. I see it as a good thing that threads like this keep popping up, especially when there are new articles (rather than 9 threads about that one NYT article).powerlawyer06 wrote:The reason why I am underwhelmed by the article is because I feel like every TLS user has heard this one million times. We are all more informed than the average law school applicant. I feel like this is a dead horse we are beating.
Posting another "law schools lie" article on TLS is like going into a christian church and saying "Have you guys heard about this Jesus guy?"
- CG614
- Posts: 797
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2010 10:26 am
Re: Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects
And the problem with your analysis is that it assumes that "busting your butt" can give you an advantage. Don't you think everyone is "busting their butt?" Since you can't reasonably predict grades/employment (outside of some other factors like work experience), it is reasonable to use the 1 in 10 (numbers depending on school) model for success.Capitol A wrote:I believe that this is important information, and that there are probably a lot of people that still think a law degree (ANY law degree) is a ticket to fame and fortune. Those people would definitely benefit from a wake up call before taking on hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt pursuing a path in which the odds are stacked against them ever securing gainful employment.
All this being said, I don't think I have a similar reaction to this type of info that most TLSers seem to. You see a lot of TLS posts that say things like: "If you attend school X you only have a 1 in 10 chance at BigLaw" as if there is some type of raffle at the school to determine who gets the 'good' jobs. It doesn't work like that. This same logic would have given the same advice to me and to George Clooney regarding pursuing careers in acting: "don't do it. You have a 1 in a million chance of actually making money." When the truth is that he is talented and good looking. I, on the other hand am just good looking-no talent. So we don't each have an equal shot as in the case of some type of lottery system.
My point is, if you are going to Cooley or to Phoenix SOL, you are making a terrible investment; but if you are going to Ohio State, or Alabama, or some other mid-range T50 where they are realistically putting 40% or so of their grads into full time legal employment, then it is at least in part up to you, and your talent and your work ethic to determine whether you are in the group that makes the school proud or you are in the group that they report as being employed even though you are walking behind the elephants at the local circus. No one is going to hand you anything on a silver platter or write you check just because you have a JD, but if you are willing to bust your butt to ensure you are a standout perfomer in class and in your internships/externships etc. Some people are getting good jobs, and you can be one of those people.
-
- Posts: 6244
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 6:09 pm
Re: Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects
bk187 wrote:Why must CA be so bumfucked? And yeah it is probably either Davis or Hastings.aliarrow wrote:Of one T50 school. I'm pretty confident its a not-so-great Cali school.romothesavior wrote:The most shocking conclusion made in the article is that well less than 50% of law school graduates found full-time, permanent employment that requires a J.D. That is downright appalling.bk187 wrote:I'm actually reading it because you said this. And I agree, it's pretty good.
Not that I think this would be that much of a stretch for the other schools.
In order to calculate this figure, I used employment data drawn from 183 individual NALP forms, in which graduates of one top 50 school self-reported their employment status nine months after graduation.
http://www.law.ucdavis.edu/prospective/ ... stics.htmlOf the 191 students in the class, information was available on the employment status of 190 students. Of the 190 students, nine months after graduation, 183 students were employed; 5 students were enrolled in an advanced degree program; and 2 students were not seeking employment. Thus, this graduating class had a success rate of 99%, nine months after graduation.
I think it actually is Davis... /jk... no idea what these NALP forms are... I wonder if public has access to them...
Last edited by Borhas on Sun Jan 28, 2018 1:48 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- stratocophic
- Posts: 2204
- Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:24 pm
Re: Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects
*Is TLS poster*ThomasMN wrote:Someone should hit up TNR for hardcore plagiarism. I swear I read an article with the same facts, though somewhat less vitriolic, months ago. It throws around a lot of anecdotal evidence to create a storm of "controversy." I have to agree with the posters above: just another person stirring the pot that going to a ttt law school, or even a "t50" school, is probably not a good idea if you it will leave you $100,000 - $250,000 in debt.
That being said, the job market BLOWS, PERIOD. I know this article is old: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/05/25/busin ... djobs.html . We are in a general crunch, and the sad reality is that most people who are entering the job market right now or who entered the job market over the last few years are in a generally bad spot. Some majors are certainly better off than others. I know that Gallup has the U.S. underemployment rate at somewhere around %20. That does not mean don't be a lawyer, it means make a smart, educated choice when it comes to attending law school. I think a lot of TLS posters do exactly that.
*Attends GULC at sticker off of waitlist*
*Has 0 work experience and a degree in art history*
*Is making 'smart, educated choice' to attend law school*
*Will definitely work very hard to do well, be in top 25% of class, get Biglaw*
*Makes this face*
Case in pointCG614 wrote:And the problem with your analysis is that it assumes that "busting your butt" can give you an advantage. Don't you think everyone is "busting their butt?" Since you can't reasonably predict grades/employment (outside of some other factors like work experience), it is reasonable to use the 1 in 10 (numbers depending on school) model for success.Capitol A wrote:I believe that this is important information, and that there are probably a lot of people that still think a law degree (ANY law degree) is a ticket to fame and fortune. Those people would definitely benefit from a wake up call before taking on hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt pursuing a path in which the odds are stacked against them ever securing gainful employment.
All this being said, I don't think I have a similar reaction to this type of info that most TLSers seem to. You see a lot of TLS posts that say things like: "If you attend school X you only have a 1 in 10 chance at BigLaw" as if there is some type of raffle at the school to determine who gets the 'good' jobs. It doesn't work like that. This same logic would have given the same advice to me and to George Clooney regarding pursuing careers in acting: "don't do it. You have a 1 in a million chance of actually making money." When the truth is that he is talented and good looking. I, on the other hand am just good looking-no talent. So we don't each have an equal shot as in the case of some type of lottery system.
My point is, if you are going to Cooley or to Phoenix SOL, you are making a terrible investment; but if you are going to Ohio State, or Alabama, or some other mid-range T50 where they are realistically putting 40% or so of their grads into full time legal employment, then it is at least in part up to you, and your talent and your work ethic to determine whether you are in the group that makes the school proud or you are in the group that they report as being employed even though you are walking behind the elephants at the local circus. No one is going to hand you anything on a silver platter or write you check just because you have a JD, but if you are willing to bust your butt to ensure you are a standout perfomer in class and in your internships/externships etc. Some people are getting good jobs, and you can be one of those people.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 642
- Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 1:17 pm
Re: Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects
Yes. But the ABA is the most powerful legal organization in the US. This is madneess, and if it doesn't get stopped, things are gonna end badly. You and I know that this cannot continue for long-time. There will be serious repercusions for the legal profession. If the ABA can't do it, fine, get rid of them and have someone else be the regualtor of legal education.aliarrow wrote:You have to take into consideration that the ABA doesn't deal with reasonable benign organizations and people, they deal with lawyers.scammedhard wrote:I don't see/hear the AMA, APA, ADA, or other prefessional organzitions running into anti-trust issues.aliarrow wrote:TBF, 2010 data is expected to be the worst data of all.
Also, what exactly do you propose the ABA does? If they just shut down schools and take away accreditation they run into anti-trust issues.
The ABA should FORCE schools to release accurate and honest employment data and have the data audited regulalry. They should also raise the bar passage standards and close down schools that have awful attrition rates, like Cooley, Jefferson, Barry, and half the other TTTs. I see no anti-trust issues there. Just preventing stupid people from being scammed.
-
- Posts: 886
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 6:08 pm
Re: Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects
US News?scammedhard wrote:Yes. But the ABA is the most powerful legal organization in the US. This is madneess, and if it doesn't get stopped, things are gonna end badly. You and I know that this cannot continue for long-time. There will be serious repercusions for the legal profession. If the ABA can't do it, fine, get rid of them and have someone else be the regualtor of legal education.aliarrow wrote:You have to take into consideration that the ABA doesn't deal with reasonable benign organizations and people, they deal with lawyers.scammedhard wrote:I don't see/hear the AMA, APA, ADA, or other prefessional organzitions running into anti-trust issues.aliarrow wrote:TBF, 2010 data is expected to be the worst data of all.
Also, what exactly do you propose the ABA does? If they just shut down schools and take away accreditation they run into anti-trust issues.
The ABA should FORCE schools to release accurate and honest employment data and have the data audited regulalry. They should also raise the bar passage standards and close down schools that have awful attrition rates, like Cooley, Jefferson, Barry, and half the other TTTs. I see no anti-trust issues there. Just preventing stupid people from being scammed.
But i just... don't even know. The hiring model that was in place pre-recession wasn't even around that long, so everything is changing so fast its hard to really make any sort of predictions in regard to law schools or legal employment in general other than 'it sucks'. Who really knows what direction this all will take? Things will likely be drastically different even 5 or 10 years from now.
I do think the amount of risk actually is somewhat necessary though given the biglaw hiring model. There are NO other career or education path that give as good of a chance (relatively speaking, it still isn't a good chance overall) of making six figures while still in your mid-20s. So the nature of the beast is that many are going to flock to it and only the strongest survive. I think the argument to be made would be to scale down biglaw salaries (and tuition prices as well) and make law more appealing to those who truly want to be lawyers while not attracting every greedy asshole in the country who couldn't succeed at something else. A more normalized distribution with maybe $60-80k being the norm right out of school.
-
- Posts: 20063
- Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Re: Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects
Madness...? This is Sparta!scammedhard wrote:This is madneess, and if it doesn't get stopped, things are gonna end badly. You and I know that this cannot continue for long-time. There will be serious repercusions for the legal profession. If the ABA can't do it, fine, get rid of them and have someone else be the regualtor of legal education.
Couldn't help myself.
-
- Posts: 886
- Joined: Tue Mar 15, 2011 6:08 pm
Re: Article: How Law Schools Misrepresent Employment Prospects
good callbk187 wrote:Madness...? This is Sparta!scammedhard wrote:This is madneess, and if it doesn't get stopped, things are gonna end badly. You and I know that this cannot continue for long-time. There will be serious repercusions for the legal profession. If the ABA can't do it, fine, get rid of them and have someone else be the regualtor of legal education.
Couldn't help myself.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login