How does Law School Admissions differ from Undergrad? Forum

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
Post Reply
BillsFan9907

Silver
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am

How does Law School Admissions differ from Undergrad?

Post by BillsFan9907 » Wed Mar 30, 2011 4:15 pm

How does Law School Admissions differ from Undergrad?

My main interest is that from a statistical perspective, people with top numbers (GPA and LSAT) can approach an 80% + chance of being accepted to HLS compared to, if I remember correctly, a much lower probability for getting into Harvard college based on SATs and GPA.

bk1

Diamond
Posts: 20063
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm

Re: How does Law School Admissions differ from Undergrad?

Post by bk1 » Wed Mar 30, 2011 4:19 pm

The reason for the difference between HLS and Harvard UG is that the applicant pool for UG is so large whereas the applicant pool for law school is so small and HLS, with one of the biggest class sizes, can't afford to be as highly selective as Yale/Stanford (who have small class sizes) while still trying to pick people with 3.8-4.0 GPA's and 175-180 LSAT's. There just aren't enough for them to start delving into differentiating them based on softs.

Law school is so numbers based because the ABA accreditation requirements make all law schools look very similar and thus be able to have only one top ranking system (USNWR) as opposed to things like business schools where there are multiple ranking systems or undergrads where you have varying course selections/majors/colleges/etc.

BillsFan9907

Silver
Posts: 1381
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2009 12:28 am

Re: How does Law School Admissions differ from Undergrad?

Post by BillsFan9907 » Wed Mar 30, 2011 4:22 pm

Thanks for the detailed response

09042014

Diamond
Posts: 18203
Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm

Re: How does Law School Admissions differ from Undergrad?

Post by 09042014 » Wed Mar 30, 2011 4:38 pm

bk187 wrote:The reason for the difference between HLS and Harvard UG is that the applicant pool for UG is so large whereas the applicant pool for law school is so small and HLS, with one of the biggest class sizes, can't afford to be as highly selective as Yale/Stanford (who have small class sizes) while still trying to pick people with 3.8-4.0 GPA's and 175-180 LSAT's. There just aren't enough for them to start delving into differentiating them based on softs.

Law school is so numbers based because the ABA accreditation requirements make all law schools look very similar and thus be able to have only one top ranking system (USNWR) as opposed to things like business schools where there are multiple ranking systems or undergrads where you have varying course selections/majors/colleges/etc.
While ABA and USNWR do have a lot to do with it, I think another reason it's so number based compared to other grad programs is there is no prelaw background that helps. Law schools actively want law students walking in on day 1 with zero knowledge of the law.

Most other grad programs want you to have significant base knowledge, experience and/or talent.

Want to continue reading?

Register now to search topics and post comments!

Absolutely FREE!


Post Reply

Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”