Top Law Schools

whymeohgodno wrote:

Bumi wrote:I have a few schools I would like to send this to.

At least if a Cornell application was submitted on September 1, you know it was reviewed for Early Action, right? Meanwhile, USC intends to ignore many of the applications completely until mid-May. And who even knows what Emory is up to.

Emory: LSAT>166 = IN

not true anymore, at all.

Mickey Quicknumbers wrote:

whymeohgodno wrote:

Bumi wrote:I have a few schools I would like to send this to.

At least if a Cornell application was submitted on September 1, you know it was reviewed for Early Action, right? Meanwhile, USC intends to ignore many of the applications completely until mid-May. And who even knows what Emory is up to.

Emory: LSAT>166 = IN

not true anymore, at all.

he forgot GPA>3.0

why would you trade mcdonalds for law school acceptance in greatest country in the world. i can get mcdonalds in poland with same value meal as any where. mcnuggets are good but not as good as law education in U.S.A. i would not go through with trade if i were you.

Andrzej wrote:why would you trade mcdonalds for law school acceptance in greatest country in the world. i can get mcdonalds in poland with same value meal as any where. mcnuggets are good but not as good as law education in U.S.A. i would not go through with trade if i were you.

your gimmick is humorous and refreshing. please continue. i hope you reach 10k posts.

fatduck wrote:

Mickey Quicknumbers wrote:

whymeohgodno wrote:

Bumi wrote:I have a few schools I would like to send this to.

At least if a Cornell application was submitted on September 1, you know it was reviewed for Early Action, right? Meanwhile, USC intends to ignore many of the applications completely until mid-May. And who even knows what Emory is up to.

Emory: LSAT>166 = IN

not true anymore, at all.

he forgot GPA>3.0

sub 3.5's are getting slaughtered this cycle.

Mickey Quicknumbers wrote:

whymeohgodno wrote:

Bumi wrote:I have a few schools I would like to send this to.

At least if a Cornell application was submitted on September 1, you know it was reviewed for Early Action, right? Meanwhile, USC intends to ignore many of the applications completely until mid-May. And who even knows what Emory is up to.

Emory: LSAT>166 = IN

not true anymore, at all.

http://emory.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats

looks pretty damn accurate to me.

Andrzej wrote:why would you trade mcdonalds for law school acceptance in greatest country in the world. i can get mcdonalds in poland with same value meal as any where. mcnuggets are good but not as good as law education in U.S.A. i would not go through with trade if i were you.

I never said I would trade McNuggets for acceptance. I said a gift card, and I would use it for the McRib. Sure, the McRib is probably just a large McNugget with no crispy exterior, dipped in tangy barbecue sauce, served on an artisan sesame roll, but at least when you give someone $60 at the McDonald's drive-thru, you get something to show for it.

whymeohgodno wrote:

Mickey Quicknumbers wrote: not true anymore, at all.

http://emory.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats

looks pretty damn accurate to me.

That graph doesn't show all the people who haven't heard yet.

Bumi wrote:

whymeohgodno wrote:

Mickey Quicknumbers wrote: not true anymore, at all.

http://emory.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats

looks pretty damn accurate to me.

That graph doesn't show all the people who haven't heard yet.

NO SHIT SHERLOCK

but i'm guessing you+that other guy can accurately predict that most of these "pendings" will defy the current trend of the cycle?

whymeohgodno wrote: NO SHIT SHERLOCK

but i'm guessing you+that other guy can accurately predict that most of these "pendings" will defy the current trend of the cycle?

I really enjoy your posts though.

whymeohgodno wrote:

Bumi wrote:

whymeohgodno wrote:

Mickey Quicknumbers wrote: not true anymore, at all.

http://emory.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats

looks pretty damn accurate to me.

That graph doesn't show all the people who haven't heard yet.

NO SHIT SHERLOCK

but i'm guessing you+that other guy can accurately predict that most of these "pendings" will defy the current trend of the cycle?

Uh, yeah actually I think it's pretty important to wait for the declines and waitlists to roll in until you make conclusions about what stats lead to auto-admission. So far, being equal to or over 166 means that you're likely to be (a) admitted (b) get no decision by late March. With very few declines and waitlists so far, I'm not sure how you can reasonably conclude from existing data that being equal to or over 166 means that you're automatically admitted.

dpk711 wrote:

parsi wrote:[

if cornell didnt take so damn long, maybe they wouldnt be trolled against

If your credentials were so good, then maybe Cornell wouldn't have taken so damn long to make a decision.

Maybe your right...i guess I'll just enjoy nyu then while I wait for my cornell wl

Love it

tehrocstar wrote:Love it

+1

whymeohgodno wrote:

Bumi wrote:

whymeohgodno wrote:

Mickey Quicknumbers wrote: not true anymore, at all.

http://emory.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats

looks pretty damn accurate to me.

That graph doesn't show all the people who haven't heard yet.

NO SHIT SHERLOCK

but i'm guessing you+that other guy can accurately predict that most of these "pendings" will defy the current trend of the cycle?

i got waitlisted with a 170. suck it.

whymeohgodno wrote:

Bumi wrote:I have a few schools I would like to send this to.

At least if a Cornell application was submitted on September 1, you know it was reviewed for Early Action, right? Meanwhile, USC intends to ignore many of the applications completely until mid-May. And who even knows what Emory is up to.

Emory: LSAT>166 = IN

I'm over 166. And what do you know, I got my Emory decision tonight.

Waitlist.

Mickey Quicknumbers wrote:

whymeohgodno wrote: NO SHIT SHERLOCK

but i'm guessing you+that other guy can accurately predict that most of these "pendings" will defy the current trend of the cycle?

I really enjoy your posts though.

He is just an atrocious poster. Some people have a bad thread here and there, but few people have this kind of consistency.

retake. duh.

romothesavior wrote:

Mickey Quicknumbers wrote:

whymeohgodno wrote: NO SHIT SHERLOCK

but i'm guessing you+that other guy can accurately predict that most of these "pendings" will defy the current trend of the cycle?

I really enjoy your posts though.

He is just an atrocious poster. Some people have a bad thread here and there, but few people have this kind of consistency.

Oh believe me I know. I would campaign on his behalf as the worst poster on this site by a good margin.

tehrocstar wrote:Bah-dah-bah-bah-bah! I'm lovin' it Love it

FTFY

People who can't write coherent personal statements don't count in this equation LOL

I was WL to Emory with a 3.7/167 and a Why Emory... Yayyyy