tourdeforcex wrote:anyone know when the print edition comes out?
Anyone know?
tourdeforcex wrote:anyone know when the print edition comes out?
Code: Select all
2012 ... 2002 USN&WRP (AVERAGE)
Yale 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.00
Harvard 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 2.36
Stanford 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 2.45
Columbia 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4.09
NYU 6 6 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5.00
Chicago 5 5 6 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5.91
Penn 7 7 8 7 6 7 7 7 7 7 10 7.27
Michigan 7 9 9 9 8 8 8 7 7 7 7 7.82
Berkeley 9 7 6 6 8 8 11 13 10 7 9 8.55
UVA 9 10 10 9 10 8 8 9 9 7 7 8.73
Duke 11 11 10 12 10 11 11 10 10 12 10 10.73
NU 12 11 10 9 12 12 10 10 12 11 13 11.09
Cornell 13 13 13 12 13 13 11 12 12 13 12 12.45
GULC 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14.00
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Yes I agree. I try not to get overly emotional about the rankings, I'm going to go to a strong #30 (who dropped from 28 to 30 this year, as I saw ITT) in my region that I want to practice in for CHEAP, so I'm not too worried about these rankings anymore.LiveFreeOrLaw wrote:I think only 0Ls are this conscientious about law school rankings. In real life, people who went to regionally respected schools do just fine in life.
To my understanding, UC schools are strapped for money. Check out the UC Davis thread in the waiting forum.coldshoulder wrote:This is making me look more seriously at California...I'd be above the 75th LSAT and right below the median on GPA. Do you think I could get good scholarship/merit at UC Davis?
LiveFreeOrLaw wrote:I think only 0Ls are this conscientious about law school rankings. In real life, people who went to regionally respected schools do just fine in life.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Because the whole point of the rankings and the distinction T14 is as a selling point to 0Lswhymeohgodno wrote:Even Deans of law schools use the term Top 14 around publicly. I remember seeing the Dean of Cornell use it in one of his letters.
Because they need these rankings to show their worth. As far as a law firm, I do not think they hold as much weight.whymeohgodno wrote:Even Deans of law schools use the term Top 14 around publicly. I remember seeing the Dean of Cornell use it in one of his letters.
When I was doing callbacks I met more than a few partners who were just as rankings-conscious as your typical 0L. One partner at an east-coast firm told me something to the effect of "Northwestern is a solid regional school, you should have a good chance at a job in Chicago." Another pointed out that his firm moved their recruiting schedule back that year specifically because they didn't get enough Harvard grads the year before (who had a relatively later OCI).LiveFreeOrLaw wrote:I think only 0Ls are this conscientious about law school rankings. In real life, people who went to regionally respected schools do just fine in life.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
You forgot Texas.neonx wrote:Code: Select all
2012 ... 2002 USN&WRP (AVERAGE) Yale 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.00 Harvard 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 2.36 Stanford 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 2.45 Columbia 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4.09 NYU 6 6 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5.00 Chicago 5 5 6 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5.91 Penn 7 7 8 7 6 7 7 7 7 7 10 7.27 Michigan 7 9 9 9 8 8 8 7 7 7 7 7.82 Berkeley 9 7 6 6 8 8 11 13 10 7 9 8.55 UVA 9 10 10 9 10 8 8 9 9 7 7 8.73 Duke 11 11 10 12 10 11 11 10 10 12 10 10.73 NU 12 11 10 9 12 12 10 10 12 11 13 11.09 Cornell 13 13 13 12 13 13 11 12 12 13 12 12.45 GULC 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14.00
No, I don't think he did.Cade McNown wrote:You forgot Texas.neonx wrote:Code: Select all
2012 ... 2002 USN&WRP (AVERAGE) Yale 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1.00 Harvard 2 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 3 3 2.36 Stanford 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 2 2.45 Columbia 4 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4.09 NYU 6 6 5 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 5.00 Chicago 5 5 6 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5.91 Penn 7 7 8 7 6 7 7 7 7 7 10 7.27 Michigan 7 9 9 9 8 8 8 7 7 7 7 7.82 Berkeley 9 7 6 6 8 8 11 13 10 7 9 8.55 UVA 9 10 10 9 10 8 8 9 9 7 7 8.73 Duke 11 11 10 12 10 11 11 10 10 12 10 10.73 NU 12 11 10 9 12 12 10 10 12 11 13 11.09 Cornell 13 13 13 12 13 13 11 12 12 13 12 12.45 GULC 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14 14.00
whymeohgodno wrote: No, I don't think he did.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
What a joker. Unbelievable. Where did this person go to school?rayiner wrote:When I was doing callbacks I met more than a few partners who were just as rankings-conscious as your typical 0L. One partner at an east-coast firm told me something to the effect of "Northwestern is a solid regional school, you should have a good chance at a job in Chicago." Another pointed out that his firm moved their recruiting schedule back that year specifically because they didn't get enough Harvard grads the year before (who had a relatively later OCI).LiveFreeOrLaw wrote:I think only 0Ls are this conscientious about law school rankings. In real life, people who went to regionally respected schools do just fine in life.
Partners definitely know the pecking order. They may not know the year-to-year variations, but I'd imagine most of the ones who graduated in the last 20 years could identify the T10/T14 as a group even if they didn't know the label.
HYS, but to be fair, he went to school back in a time when hiring at the prestigious firms was even more a Harvard/Yale+local top school thing, b/c they hadn't gotten so leveraged that they needed to recruit bodies nationally.run26.2 wrote:What a joker. Unbelievable. Where did this person go to school?rayiner wrote:When I was doing callbacks I met more than a few partners who were just as rankings-conscious as your typical 0L. One partner at an east-coast firm told me something to the effect of "Northwestern is a solid regional school, you should have a good chance at a job in Chicago." Another pointed out that his firm moved their recruiting schedule back that year specifically because they didn't get enough Harvard grads the year before (who had a relatively later OCI).LiveFreeOrLaw wrote:I think only 0Ls are this conscientious about law school rankings. In real life, people who went to regionally respected schools do just fine in life.
Partners definitely know the pecking order. They may not know the year-to-year variations, but I'd imagine most of the ones who graduated in the last 20 years could identify the T10/T14 as a group even if they didn't know the label.
I've had people outright ask me what the current rank of my school was during interviews. I sense a lot of it is just curiosity --> people love a horse race. But even if people don't place much stock in the ranks beyond the spectacle, they are interested in them and I have to imagine there's some effect.rayiner wrote:HYS, but to be fair, he went to school back in a time when hiring at the prestigious firms was even more a Harvard/Yale+local top school thing, b/c they hadn't gotten so leveraged that they needed to recruit bodies nationally.run26.2 wrote:What a joker. Unbelievable. Where did this person go to school?rayiner wrote:When I was doing callbacks I met more than a few partners who were just as rankings-conscious as your typical 0L. One partner at an east-coast firm told me something to the effect of "Northwestern is a solid regional school, you should have a good chance at a job in Chicago." Another pointed out that his firm moved their recruiting schedule back that year specifically because they didn't get enough Harvard grads the year before (who had a relatively later OCI).LiveFreeOrLaw wrote:I think only 0Ls are this conscientious about law school rankings. In real life, people who went to regionally respected schools do just fine in life.
Partners definitely know the pecking order. They may not know the year-to-year variations, but I'd imagine most of the ones who graduated in the last 20 years could identify the T10/T14 as a group even if they didn't know the label.
Also to be fair, most the partners I met who were prestige conscious where not so in a snooty way. It wasn't "I'm better than you b/c I went to a top school." It was more like my asian parents: "of course the smart people who work the hardest go to the top schools."
jamcdowell wrote: Because they need these rankings to show their worth. As far as a law firm, I do not think they hold as much weight.
By chance I met a recruiting coordinator from a respectable Texas firm while I was choosing a law school to attend. She asked which schools I was considering. When I told her, she said, "Oh, those are good schools. We take from the top ##% at school X and ##% at school Y." We discussed school rankings and she told me that they had a spreadsheet with a percentage cut-off for interviewees from each school.danquayle wrote: I've had people outright ask me what the current rank of my school was during interviews. I sense a lot of it is just curiosity --> people love a horse race. But even if people don't place much stock in the ranks beyond the spectacle, they are interested in them and I have to imagine there's some effect.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login