US News Recruiter Rankings

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
User avatar
DubPoker
Posts: 211
Joined: Wed May 06, 2009 4:13 pm

Re: US News Recruiter Rankings

Postby DubPoker » Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:05 pm

This article says "In the first ever ranking of law schools by hiring officials at the country's top law firms"

Doesn't US news normally have reputational ranking? I thought it from both judges and firms? This is just firms?

CanadianWolf
Posts: 10439
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm

Re: US News Recruiter Rankings

Postby CanadianWolf » Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:08 pm

This is just the opinions of those 750 hiring partners at law firms who returned the survey form.

CanadianWolf
Posts: 10439
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm

Re: US News Recruiter Rankings

Postby CanadianWolf » Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:10 pm

@bdubs : No.

User avatar
LLB2JD
Posts: 745
Joined: Tue Sep 29, 2009 5:32 pm

Re: US News Recruiter Rankings

Postby LLB2JD » Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:10 pm

CanadianWolf wrote:This is just the opinions of those 750 hiring partners at law firms who returned the survey form.


LoL... But watch how some schools are going to include this info in their brochures for next year. However, the opinions of hiring partners is nothing to sneeze at. Afterall, they hold the wand to the plum jobs that most of us are all gunning for.

User avatar
zreinhar
Posts: 308
Joined: Wed May 27, 2009 12:15 pm

Re: US News Recruiter Rankings

Postby zreinhar » Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:13 pm

With a response rate of 14% I think you could put even less weight to these rankings... also, no GW? ruh roh

dabbadon8
Posts: 767
Joined: Tue May 11, 2010 2:17 am

Re: US News Recruiter Rankings

Postby dabbadon8 » Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:14 pm

CanadianWolf wrote:@dabbadon8: I think that you may have missed the word "not" in my post noting the comment as Virginia & Duke are ranked higher in the recruiting survey.


No I meant it is unlikely that they let something go because that would mean there would be a huge shake up in the rankings and I doubt that is the case. I was saying that since so many schools had a relatively dramatic move I doubt those comments by the author revealed anything.

User avatar
rayiner
Posts: 6184
Joined: Thu Dec 11, 2008 11:43 am

Re: US News Recruiter Rankings

Postby rayiner » Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:15 pm

bdubs wrote:
dabbadon8 wrote:
CanadianWolf wrote:Did the author let one of the new school ranks slip when 8th place for Northwestern was not noted as being better than their USNews ranking even though Michigan & Cornell (tied at 8th with Northwestern, Chicago & Berkeley) were tagged as being lower ranked than 8th place ?


Doubt it. Virginia is 6, and duke 8. Both also not mentioned.


?? Virginia is currently 10 and Duke is tied for 11 with Northwestern

New rankings would have to look something like this:
7 Penn
8 Berkeley
8 Virginia
8 Duke
8 Northwestern
12 Michigan
13 Cornell
14 Georgetown


I can totes get behind this ranking.

columbia86
Posts: 181
Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 11:59 am

Re: US News Recruiter Rankings

Postby columbia86 » Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:25 pm

mez06 wrote:useless.


???

User avatar
arhmcpo
Posts: 325
Joined: Wed Jan 07, 2009 7:05 pm

Re: US News Recruiter Rankings

Postby arhmcpo » Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:37 pm

columbia86 wrote:
mez06 wrote:useless.


???


Um, a 14% response rate?

paulinaporizkova
Posts: 2494
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:25 pm

Re: US News Recruiter Rankings

Postby paulinaporizkova » Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:41 pm

CanadianWolf wrote:@bdubs : No.

CanadianWolf
Posts: 10439
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm

Re: US News Recruiter Rankings

Postby CanadianWolf » Mon Mar 07, 2011 3:57 pm

Although it could just be an editorial oversight, the suggestions by omission in the line that "Cornell & Michigan fared better than in the overall USNews rankings" is that in the upcoming (next week) rankings is that Virginia will be ranked at least sixth while Duke & Northwestern will move up to eighth or better.

paulinaporizkova
Posts: 2494
Joined: Mon Nov 22, 2010 9:25 pm

Re: US News Recruiter Rankings

Postby paulinaporizkova » Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:00 pm

CanadianWolf wrote:Although it could just be an editorial oversight, the suggestions by omission in the line that "Cornell & Michigan fared better than in the overall USNews rankings" is that in the upcoming (next week) rankings is that Virginia will be ranked at least sixth while Duke & Northwestern will move up to eighth or better.

i just read this multiple times and still have no idea what you said.......

CanadianWolf
Posts: 10439
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm

Re: US News Recruiter Rankings

Postby CanadianWolf » Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:06 pm

You need to read it in conjunction with the article that is the subject of this thread. As I wrote, it could just be an editorial oversight or it could be that the article was referring to the new rankings. If Northwestern & Duke are tied for 8th place in the recruiter rankings & the article points out that the recruiter rankings of Michigan (tied for4th) & Cornell (tied for 8th) are better than their USNews overall rankings, then the implication by omission is that Duke & Northwestern are ranked 8th or higher in the new overall rankings. Otherwise, the editor & author of the article did a very poor job of fact checking. Same for Virginia & its sixth place recruiter ranking.

To further simplify, one needs to be aware that, at least until March 15th, Duke & Northwestern are ranked 11th in the USNews overall rankings & Virginia is ranked 10th. Cornell & Michigan, however, are ranked 13th & 10th respectively overall.
Last edited by CanadianWolf on Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:11 pm, edited 1 time in total.

FiveSermon
Posts: 1507
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:56 pm

Re: US News Recruiter Rankings

Postby FiveSermon » Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:10 pm

CanadianWolf wrote:You need to read it in conjunction with the article that is the subject of this thread. As I wrote, it could just be an editorial oversight or it could be that the article was referring to the new rankings. If Northwestern & Duke are tied for 8th place in the recruiter rankings & the article points out that the recruiter rankings of Michigan (tied for4th) & Cornell (tied for 8th) are better than their USNews overall rankings, then the implication by omission is that Duke & Northwestern are ranked 8th or higher in the new overall rankings. Otherwise, the editor & author of the article did a very poor job of fact checking. Same for Virginia & its sixth place recruiter ranking.


"Those were stronger showings for Michigan and Cornell compared to their rankings in the overall U.S. News list."

That's all I could find. That only means that M and C outperformed their rankings. I don't get what you are getting at.

User avatar
JusticeHarlan
Posts: 1434
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:56 pm

Re: US News Recruiter Rankings

Postby JusticeHarlan » Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:11 pm

paulinaporizkova wrote:
CanadianWolf wrote:Although it could just be an editorial oversight, the suggestions by omission in the line that "Cornell & Michigan fared better than in the overall USNews rankings" is that in the upcoming (next week) rankings is that Virginia will be ranked at least sixth while Duke & Northwestern will move up to eighth or better.

i just read this multiple times and still have no idea what you said.......

The theory involves overly reading into this paragraph from the article:

Other schools that fared well in the recruiters' survey include Columbia University and University of Michigan—Ann Arbor, tied for fourth place; New York University and the University of Virginia in sixth place; and Cornell University, Duke University, Northwestern University, University of California—Berkeley, and University of Chicago, all in eighth place. Those were stronger showings for Michigan and Cornell compared to their rankings in the overall U.S. News list.


If Michigan is ranked 4th in the recruiter rankings, and it 'fairs better' in that ranking than in the overall rankings, we know its ranked below 4th in the overall rankings (which would be unsurprising). Ditto with Cornell: if it was ranked 8th in this rankings, and it did better in this ranking than in the overall ranking, then it must be ranked below 8th in the overall ranking. Again, I think we all expect Michigan to be below 4th and Cornell below 8th. So it doesn't say much.

However, what I believe CanadianWolf is jabbering about is that the article doesn't make such remarks about other schools: therefore, the 'suggestion by omission' is that if UVA is ranked 6th in the recruiter rankings, and isn't mentioned as out performing its overall rankings, then that implies UVA is ranked 6th in the overall ranking. Ditto for Duke and Northwestern at 8th.

I don't agree with the logic, but I think that's what he's getting at.

FiveSermon
Posts: 1507
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:56 pm

Re: US News Recruiter Rankings

Postby FiveSermon » Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:12 pm

JusticeHarlan wrote:
paulinaporizkova wrote:
CanadianWolf wrote:Although it could just be an editorial oversight, the suggestions by omission in the line that "Cornell & Michigan fared better than in the overall USNews rankings" is that in the upcoming (next week) rankings is that Virginia will be ranked at least sixth while Duke & Northwestern will move up to eighth or better.

i just read this multiple times and still have no idea what you said.......

The theory involves overly reading into this paragraph from the article:

Other schools that fared well in the recruiters' survey include Columbia University and University of Michigan—Ann Arbor, tied for fourth place; New York University and the University of Virginia in sixth place; and Cornell University, Duke University, Northwestern University, University of California—Berkeley, and University of Chicago, all in eighth place. Those were stronger showings for Michigan and Cornell compared to their rankings in the overall U.S. News list.


If Michigan is ranked 4th in the recruiter rankings, and it 'fairs better' in that ranking than in the overall rankings, we know its ranked below 4th in the overall rankings (which would be unsurprising). Ditto with Cornell: if it was ranked 8th in this rankings, and it did better in this ranking than in the overall ranking, then it must be ranked below 8th in the overall ranking. Again, I think we all expect Michigan to be below 4th and Cornell below 8th. So it doesn't say much.

However, what I believe CanadianWolf is jabbering about is that the article doesn't make such remarks about other schools: therefore, the 'suggestion by omission' is that if UVA is ranked 6th in the recruiter rankings, and isn't mentioned as out performing its overall rankings, then that implies UVA is ranked 6th in the overall ranking. Ditto for Duke and Northwestern at 8th.

I don't agree with the logic, but I think that's what he's getting at.


That's terrible logic. That's not even logic per se. That's just bad assumptions.

CanadianWolf
Posts: 10439
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm

Re: US News Recruiter Rankings

Postby CanadianWolf » Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:13 pm

The logic is sound, but the question is simply whether or not this is an editorial oversight &/or poor fact checking. If the logic is not sound, then why leave out Virginia, Duke & Northwestern from the line noting Cornell & Michigan's superior rankings over their overall USNews rankings ?

P.S. Regardless, whether it is an editorial error or not, we'll all know on March 15th when the new USNews overall rankings are released.
Last edited by CanadianWolf on Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

FiveSermon
Posts: 1507
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:56 pm

Re: US News Recruiter Rankings

Postby FiveSermon » Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:16 pm

CanadianWolf wrote:The logic is sound, but the question is simply whether or not this is an editorial oversight &/or poor fact checking. If the logic is not sound, then why leave out Virginia, Duke & Northwestern from the line noting Cornell & Michigan's superior rankings over their overall USNews rankings ?

P.S. Regardless whether it is an editorial error or not, we'll all know on March 15th when the new USNews overall rankings are released.


Because if school A outperforms it's US news rankings by 1-2 spot while school B outperforms it by 6 spots, one is news while other is just acceptable margin of error. Hurr Durr.

CanadianWolf
Posts: 10439
Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm

Re: US News Recruiter Rankings

Postby CanadianWolf » Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:18 pm

It would be 4 (Virginia),3 & 3 (Duke & Northwestern) versus 6 (Michigan) & 5 (Cornell).

As i wrote earlier, it could be just due to poor editing. Otherwise the article might have noted that "the most dramatic rankings difference from the overall USNews rankings were by Cornell--5 places higher--& Michigan--6 spots higher."

run26.2
Posts: 897
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 1:35 am

Re: US News Recruiter Rankings

Postby run26.2 » Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:35 pm

These rankings are rubbish. In order for Y/S to get a 4.8, somewhere between 16% and 25% of the respondents would have to give them a 4. Only H graduates would possibly do this. jk. But seriously, would this many unbiased people not give HYS a 5?

The same goes for peer schools further down. M/V would downgrade P. This explains why the smaller schools seem to underperform relative to their peers.

FiveSermon
Posts: 1507
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:56 pm

Re: US News Recruiter Rankings

Postby FiveSermon » Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:37 pm

run26.2 wrote:These rankings are rubbish. In order for Y/S to get a 4.8, somewhere between 16% and 25% of the respondents would have to give them a 4. Only H graduates would possibly do this. jk. But seriously, would this many unbiased people not give HYS a 5?

The same goes for peer schools further down. M/V would downgrade P. This explains why the smaller schools seem to underperform relative to their peers.


Cornell? One of the smallest T14's. Also greatly outperformed rankings.

run26.2
Posts: 897
Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 1:35 am

Re: US News Recruiter Rankings

Postby run26.2 » Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:40 pm

FiveSermon wrote:
run26.2 wrote:These rankings are rubbish. In order for Y/S to get a 4.8, somewhere between 16% and 25% of the respondents would have to give them a 4. Only H graduates would possibly do this. jk. But seriously, would this many unbiased people not give HYS a 5?

The same goes for peer schools further down. M/V would downgrade P. This explains why the smaller schools seem to underperform relative to their peers.


Cornell? One of the smallest T14's.

Not in a peer group with an image complex.

FiveSermon
Posts: 1507
Joined: Tue Dec 14, 2010 6:56 pm

Re: US News Recruiter Rankings

Postby FiveSermon » Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:42 pm

No clue what an "image complex" is or how that would explain this discrepancy.

Anyways I don't think small school vs big schools matter here. It's just the entire thing is dumb.

User avatar
danquayle
Posts: 1108
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 2:12 am

Re: US News Recruiter Rankings

Postby danquayle » Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:52 pm

CanadianWolf wrote:It would be 4 (Virginia),3 & 3 (Duke & Northwestern) versus 6 (Michigan) & 5 (Cornell).

As i wrote earlier, it could be just due to poor editing. Otherwise the article might have noted that "the most dramatic rankings difference from the overall USNews rankings were by Cornell--5 places higher--& Michigan--6 spots higher."


Hhhmmm. Indubitably.

User avatar
mths
Posts: 1098
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 11:24 am

Re: US News Recruiter Rankings

Postby mths » Mon Mar 07, 2011 4:59 pm

ExpectLess wrote:Actually, Yale, Chicago, Penn, Berkeley all underperformed their ranking, and they all have relatively small class sizes. All this survey did was regurgitate USNews rankings with a tilt toward large class sizes.

Cornell has a class of 190




Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 3 guests