What would be some above average softs, average softs, and below average softs?
Above average:
Average:
Below average:
About softs Forum
-
rman1201
- Posts: 957
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2010 4:11 pm
Re: About softs
Above Average: Div 1 Sports, Climbed Everest, Published research in a journal, wrote a novel, Military w/ overseas deployments, Peace Corps, Teach for America, extensive work experience in an interesting field
Average: Internships, Club leadership positions, intramural sports, average work experience
Below Average: Not having softs
Average: Internships, Club leadership positions, intramural sports, average work experience
Below Average: Not having softs
-
duckmoney
- Posts: 885
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 2:21 pm
Re: About softs
The correct TLS answer is that above average softs only include truly exceptional things - military service, teach for america, published research, nationally competitive scholarships (think Rhodes), etc. URM status also falls here.
Average softs are typical of quality applicants: undergrad involvement, club president, senior thesis, internships, work experience, etc.
Below average softs are reserved for people who have empty resumes.
In reality I think TLS downplays the value of "average" softs too much. The fact is that most law school applicants weren't fraternity president AND did 2 competitive internships AND held student government office AND wrote a senior thesis. I have comparable softs to these, and I've had multiple admissions officers tell me they were very impressed by my leadership and resume.
Bottom line: softs, unless truly exceptional, won't make up for low numbers, but they can push you over the top and mean the difference between an "accept" and a waitlist if you're right on the edge.
Average softs are typical of quality applicants: undergrad involvement, club president, senior thesis, internships, work experience, etc.
Below average softs are reserved for people who have empty resumes.
In reality I think TLS downplays the value of "average" softs too much. The fact is that most law school applicants weren't fraternity president AND did 2 competitive internships AND held student government office AND wrote a senior thesis. I have comparable softs to these, and I've had multiple admissions officers tell me they were very impressed by my leadership and resume.
Bottom line: softs, unless truly exceptional, won't make up for low numbers, but they can push you over the top and mean the difference between an "accept" and a waitlist if you're right on the edge.
