ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )

Should the LSAT be optional for law school admissions?

Poll ended at Sun May 08, 2011 3:52 pm

Yes
19
17%
No
91
83%
 
Total votes: 110

scheherezade
Posts: 14
Joined: Mon Feb 07, 2011 2:54 pm

ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

Postby scheherezade » Mon Feb 07, 2011 3:52 pm

The ABA is considering dropping the LSAT requirement for law school admissions. Apparently the change might result in many schools dropping the requirement:

An American Bar Association panel reviewing law school accreditation rules is leaning toward recommending an end to a requirement that law schools use the Law School Admissions Test. If the panel follows through on its current inclinations -- and the ABA approves the changes -- law schools could gain flexibility they now lack to make the LSAT optional or drop the test. http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2011 ... s_use_lsat


I was wondering how TLS folks would feel about that.

User avatar
Aberzombie1892
Posts: 1907
Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:56 am

Re: ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

Postby Aberzombie1892 » Mon Feb 07, 2011 3:57 pm

Even if the ABA dropped it, it wouldn't make a difference to anyone unless US News dropped it.

Even then, only crappy schools would drop it (bc it doesn't matter) and maybe HYS (just to be different).

User avatar
LeDique
Posts: 10711
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 2:10 pm

Re: ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

Postby LeDique » Mon Feb 07, 2011 3:59 pm

Totally new news that has never been talked about on here before.

User avatar
buckilaw
Posts: 842
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 1:27 am

Re: ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

Postby buckilaw » Mon Feb 07, 2011 3:59 pm

Only TTTTs would actually drop the requirement. Top schools would still use the LSAT as a tool to make standardized comparisons between apps. Which is great because then the hordes of 4.0 pre-law, criminal justice, basket weaving majors wont have that 130 LSAT preventing them from going to Cooley.

This news would be more relevant if Bob Morse at US News was contemplating dropping LSAT scores from the ranking formula.

User avatar
buckilaw
Posts: 842
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 1:27 am

Re: ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

Postby buckilaw » Mon Feb 07, 2011 4:01 pm

Aberzombie1892 wrote:Even if the ABA dropped it, it wouldn't make a difference to anyone unless US News dropped it.

Even then, only crappy schools would drop it (bc it doesn't matter) and maybe HYS (just to be different).


Actually, of all the top schools, I'm willing to bet $$$$ that Boalt would be the most likely to drop the LSAT.

User avatar
cinephile
Posts: 3645
Joined: Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:50 pm

Re: ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

Postby cinephile » Mon Feb 07, 2011 4:18 pm

Why should they? If they did, what would they judge you on -- GPA only? Or would they take softs into account much more? And how would you quantify softs? I think it'd be a mess.

User avatar
ahduth
Posts: 2471
Joined: Wed Sep 29, 2010 10:55 am

Re: ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

Postby ahduth » Mon Feb 07, 2011 4:19 pm

buckilaw wrote:
Aberzombie1892 wrote:Even if the ABA dropped it, it wouldn't make a difference to anyone unless US News dropped it.

Even then, only crappy schools would drop it (bc it doesn't matter) and maybe HYS (just to be different).


Actually, of all the top schools, I'm willing to bet $$$$ that Boalt would be the most likely to drop the LSAT.


Doesn't Northwestern also accept the GMAT?

dissonance1848
Posts: 704
Joined: Fri Aug 20, 2010 4:42 pm

Re: ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

Postby dissonance1848 » Mon Feb 07, 2011 4:24 pm

LSAT is the only objective measure they have. GPA is fucking bullshit. 4.0 in interpretive dance beats out a 3.9 in fucking quantum physics, so we know GPA is a worthless fucking indicator. Softs, so many people have them, they cancel out, except for ridiculous ones, and those people already are going to Yale/Stanford, which take probably all the people with real softs anyways.

User avatar
Sentry
Posts: 1240
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 6:38 pm

Re: ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

Postby Sentry » Mon Feb 07, 2011 4:29 pm

cinephile wrote:Why should they? If they did, what would they judge you on -- GPA only? Or would they take softs into account much more? And how would you quantify softs? I think it'd be a mess.

I think without the LSAT where you went to UG would become much more important. So if you want to be a lawyer better know by 14 so you can keep that 4.0 through high school and go to HYP! otherwise enjoy Cooley.

User avatar
prezidentv8
Posts: 3108
Joined: Mon Dec 29, 2008 5:33 am

Re: ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

Postby prezidentv8 » Mon Feb 07, 2011 4:32 pm

Sentry wrote:
cinephile wrote:Why should they? If they did, what would they judge you on -- GPA only? Or would they take softs into account much more? And how would you quantify softs? I think it'd be a mess.

I think without the LSAT where you went to UG would become much more important. So if you want to be a lawyer better know by 14 so you can keep that 4.0 through high school and go to HYP! otherwise enjoy Cooley.


:lol:

too old for this sh*
Posts: 130
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 9:48 pm

Re: ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

Postby too old for this sh* » Mon Feb 07, 2011 5:23 pm

Would not hurt my feelings one iota...it is truly sad when a three-digit test score and a UGPA from ~25 years ago are given more weight than roughly 25 years of real-world experience in the legal realm.

alpha24
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2011 8:26 pm

Re: ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

Postby alpha24 » Mon Feb 07, 2011 7:44 pm

Well to be honest it would help me a lot .. I have the standing of a tenured law professor in my own country I can't get into law school in Canada for this Bssat..

User avatar
gbpackerbacker
Posts: 634
Joined: Sun May 17, 2009 12:13 am

Re: ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

Postby gbpackerbacker » Mon Feb 07, 2011 7:58 pm

I am going to go out on a limb and say that the average LSAT score of everybody that said it should be optional is lower than the average LSAT of those who said it should be mandatory. Probably something like high 160s vs low 160s

User avatar
gman
Posts: 17
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 8:32 pm

Re: ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

Postby gman » Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:49 am

gbpackerbacker wrote:I am going to go out on a limb be reasonable and say that the average LSAT score of everybody that said it should be optional is lower than the average LSAT of those who said it should be mandatory. Probably something like high 160s vs low 160s


FTFY.

Splitters are scaaaaared.

Ignatius Reilly
Posts: 120
Joined: Sat Jan 29, 2011 12:47 am

Re: ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

Postby Ignatius Reilly » Tue Feb 08, 2011 2:52 am

the best schools usually require the most standardized testing. to think it would be different for law schools is misguided

User avatar
Flips88
Posts: 14072
Joined: Sun Oct 10, 2010 7:42 pm

Re: ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

Postby Flips88 » Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:03 am

Hey bro, this was a nice thread when I started it 3 weeks ago: viewtopic.php?f=10&t=144500

KTHANXBAI

Curry

Re: ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

Postby Curry » Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:04 am

How many times do we have to go through this.

User avatar
pilchc
Posts: 30
Joined: Sun Dec 12, 2010 11:32 pm

Re: ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

Postby pilchc » Tue Feb 08, 2011 3:47 am

I am going to go out on a limb and say that the average LSAT score of everybody that said it should be optional is lower than the average LSAT of those who said it should be mandatory. Probably something like high 160s vs low 160s


I was thinking the same thing.

Danteshek
Posts: 2167
Joined: Wed Dec 10, 2008 4:40 pm

Re: ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

Postby Danteshek » Tue Feb 08, 2011 4:27 am

Set a minimum standard for LSAT GPA. Then make admissions random. Most schools have more qualified applicants than they can take. I'm not sure they can fairly determine who is "most" qualified.

r6_philly
Posts: 10604
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

Postby r6_philly » Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:29 pm

Curry wrote:How many times do we have to go through this.


At least 4 times per cycle.

User avatar
lolschool2011
Posts: 269
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 1:14 pm

Re: ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

Postby lolschool2011 » Tue Feb 08, 2011 12:33 pm

LS admissions should be structured more like an academic and legal skill decathlon - a vigorous competition amongst peers, if you will. Think Billy Madison.

8ballistic
Posts: 61
Joined: Mon May 24, 2010 6:13 am

Re: ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

Postby 8ballistic » Tue Feb 08, 2011 11:36 pm

Yes, between December 27th and 30th there will be a four day law school trial event for all the potential law students in the nation, probably in some place like New Mexico. Students must compete against each other in standardized events that test a complete gamut of skills necessary for success as a lawyer. Law schools can send representatives to the event to scout out talent.

User avatar
lolschool2011
Posts: 269
Joined: Wed Dec 29, 2010 1:14 pm

Re: ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

Postby lolschool2011 » Wed Feb 09, 2011 12:19 am

8ballistic wrote:Yes, between December 27th and 30th there will be a four day law school trial event for all the potential law students in the nation, probably in some place like New Mexico. Students must compete against each other in standardized events that test a complete gamut of skills necessary for success as a lawyer. Law schools can send representatives to the event to scout out talent.


+1 I'd wear pinstripes.

User avatar
Veyron
Posts: 3598
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2010 3:50 am

Re: ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

Postby Veyron » Wed Feb 09, 2011 2:31 am

I will always and forever look down upon those claiming to be lawyers who have not taken the LSAT. Its like trying to join a frat without rushing.

TheThreader
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 4:19 pm

Re: ABA May Drop LSAT Requirement

Postby TheThreader » Wed Feb 09, 2011 4:00 am

without mandatory LSATS, schools can use this to game the system. Only people with higher LSATS are reported, because the lower scores don't report. Thus, schools that do not require the LSAT have a higher average LSAT (because they still accept them)




Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests