OK, thanks for the links. What's your argument?
1. Is it that Villanova's 16.7% is greater than Temple's 16.2% placement for NJL250? sorry that's not compelling enough to state Nova places better than Temple in Philly.
2. Is it that Nova's 39 placements in NLJ250 is greater than Temple's 46? 39 > 46? does not compute for me
3. Or is it that in both charts Nova is listed above Temple somehow infering its greatness. Had Nova had Penn like numbers you could with greater confidence refer to some chart or NLJ rankings b/c I expect it would be obvious. Its not obvious here so show some skill and state your argument why someone should pay nearly 3 X's Temple's in-state tuition or even substantially more than Temple's out-of-state.
Also, is it to be assumed that is current data from 2010 b/c that was not clear from the lackluster information provided here.
First, when did I say our higher placement rate justifies paying more tuition? I never made that claim, you are adding facts to make your point look better. You are also mistating the price disparity of Villanova and Temple. Temple (out-of-state) is over 30,000. Nova is 35,000. So stop inflating numbers. Temple is also in one of the worst parts of Philadelphia. I would pay the extra 5,000 a year to not get shot.
Second, Villanova, based on available data, place higher in NLJ 250 than Temple. I didn't say place much
better than Temple, or significantly
greater, I said greater. Which, as the numbers show, is true. You have no data or evidence to show otherwise, so I believe it is you who has the burden to prove that Temple places better than Villanova.