Strictly speaking, it seems like "other than a traffic violation" oddly applies to pending charges only (i.e., I should answer "yes" and include the addendum. Think of it like a logical "or" statement--the first disjunct, alone, is true.) I could include it just to be safe, but if they didn't intend it that way (which seems most likely), the addendum would be unnecessary/unrequested. I'd like to avoid them thinking "did this guy miss our explicit [sic] exception for traffic violations?"Georgetown app wrote:Have you ever been convicted of a criminal offense, or is any charge now pending against you for any crime other than a traffic violation?
Clearly I'm nitpicking and would probably be fine either way. Just want to see if anyone else has noticed this ambiguity and can perhaps clarify.