Stanford Takes on US News Rankings. <- Serious Site?
Posted: Wed Nov 17, 2010 8:35 pm
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=138187
?May/June 1997
I doubt that will affect Stanford's prestige much. I think Stanford's branding carries more weight than any USNWR article.whymeohgodno wrote:They better not. Watch USNWR drop Stanford to like 13th.
Now now this is not a race ...bk187 wrote:Ummmm....
?May/June 1997
EDIT: Ah fuck two people beat me to it.
Do you know if Stanford feels differently now?r6_philly wrote:Dude the article is 13 years old from their student paper archive site.
But it would be hilariousHopefulFish wrote:I doubt that will affect Stanford's prestige much. I think Stanford's branding carries more weight than any USNWR article.whymeohgodno wrote:They better not. Watch USNWR drop Stanford to like 13th.
I know that the President in the article is no longer the President, and the student activists are no longer the student activists ... so yes, I think they feel differently than what was mentioned in the article.HopefulFish wrote:Do you know if Stanford feels differently now?r6_philly wrote:Dude the article is 13 years old from their student paper archive site.
You're only saying that because you won.r6_philly wrote:Now now this is not a race ...
Will they let me in then?whymeohgodno wrote:They better not. Watch USNWR drop Stanford to like 13th.
That's what they said about Michigan in the 80s.HopefulFish wrote:I doubt that will affect Stanford's prestige much. I think Stanford's branding carries more weight than any USNWR article.whymeohgodno wrote:They better not. Watch USNWR drop Stanford to like 13th.
(Single Wolverine tear.)Sentry wrote:That's what they said about Michigan in the 80s.HopefulFish wrote:I doubt that will affect Stanford's prestige much. I think Stanford's branding carries more weight than any USNWR article.whymeohgodno wrote:They better not. Watch USNWR drop Stanford to like 13th.