Harvard LSAT addendum for a 170?

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
User avatar
Lovely Ludwig Van
Posts: 370
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 1:43 pm

Harvard LSAT addendum for a 170?

Postby Lovely Ludwig Van » Fri Nov 12, 2010 7:19 pm

What is the typical range of LSAT scores (25th percentile, below 25th, etc.) for people who write LSAT addendums to law schools? I know that I have just about no shot in hell of getting into HLS, but I am sending in a need-based waiver, so I will likely get to throw an app at them for free. I am just now debating whether I should write them an LSAT addendum as well, seeing as how my score is below their 25th percentile.

If I were to write one, it would address how there were multiple disruptions immediately outside my testing room which tripped me up on the first section of the test (RC), a section which contained half my total wrong answers on the test. I could also talk about how I have a history of doing better on GPA than my test scores would indicate (SAT, undergrad background).

What do people think?

User avatar
DoubleChecks
Posts: 2333
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm

Re: Harvard LSAT addendum for a 170?

Postby DoubleChecks » Fri Nov 12, 2010 7:22 pm

Lovely Ludwig Van wrote:What is the typical range of LSAT scores (25th percentile, below 25th, etc.) for people who write LSAT addendums to law schools? I know that I have just about no shot in hell of getting into HLS, but I am sending in a need-based waiver, so I will likely get to throw an app at them for free. I am just now debating whether I should write them an LSAT addendum as well, seeing as how my score is below their 25th percentile.

If I were to write one, it would address how there were multiple disruptions immediately outside my testing room which tripped me up on the first section of the test (RC), a section which contained half my total wrong answers on the test. I could also talk about how I have a history of doing better on GPA than my test scores would indicate (SAT, undergrad background).

What do people think?


wait, so you dont even have a 2nd score? not quite sure what you're trying to explain away in an addendum...i would not add one for sure. the argument that a standardized test is not a good predictor of your abilities is eh in this case because you did score well enough (170) that any GPA (even 4.0) could suggest that you're testing at exactly where you should be. If you have a REALLY low SAT score...it might be worth a VERY short addendum. imo, it wont do much.

short of that, however, I would not write one at all about 'distractions' when you have a 170 and no higher second score. it's a bit asinine, like sending an addendum for a 175, saying it should have been a 177 but you misbubbled. okay, i guess thats not exactly the same thing, but i love using the word asinine in sentences.

User avatar
Lovely Ludwig Van
Posts: 370
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 1:43 pm

Re: Harvard LSAT addendum for a 170?

Postby Lovely Ludwig Van » Fri Nov 12, 2010 7:23 pm

Yea. The 170 was my first try, but I felt I could have done a bit better. The distractions were real, and they did trip me up on the test. But if it won't do me much good to mention this, I will definitely refrain from stating it.

User avatar
calvmpv
Posts: 128
Joined: Sun Jun 27, 2010 11:54 pm

Re: Harvard LSAT addendum for a 170?

Postby calvmpv » Fri Nov 12, 2010 7:24 pm

Unless the disruptions that took place during your testing were reported to the LSAC and documented by them etc etc, you probably shouldn't write about it in your LSAT addendum.

An addendum should just state the facts...not excuses. And even if there were disruptions, many things can go down on test day...you don't want it to sound like you're making excuses or looking for something/someone to blame for whatever happened on that section of your test.

whymeohgodno
Posts: 2508
Joined: Mon Jul 19, 2010 8:15 pm

Re: Harvard LSAT addendum for a 170?

Postby whymeohgodno » Fri Nov 12, 2010 7:25 pm

Don't waste your or adcomms time.

User avatar
pinkzeppelin
Posts: 232
Joined: Mon Dec 07, 2009 11:51 pm

Re: Harvard LSAT addendum for a 170?

Postby pinkzeppelin » Fri Nov 12, 2010 7:32 pm

If your argument is that a standardized test isn't good at measuring your abilities, then use an addendum.

If your argument is that you should have scored higher, then take the test again and score higher.

User avatar
Lovely Ludwig Van
Posts: 370
Joined: Sat Oct 30, 2010 1:43 pm

Re: Harvard LSAT addendum for a 170?

Postby Lovely Ludwig Van » Fri Nov 12, 2010 7:32 pm

Alright. That's totally cool. I will not be writing an addendum then.

But dammit, I always knew that RC would be the end of me...

User avatar
im_blue
Posts: 3276
Joined: Sun Apr 12, 2009 3:53 am

Re: Harvard LSAT addendum for a 170?

Postby im_blue » Sat Nov 13, 2010 6:07 am

3.9/170 from USC is not getting HLS regardless of addendum.

mst
Posts: 925
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 3:01 am

Re: Harvard LSAT addendum for a 170?

Postby mst » Sat Nov 13, 2010 6:15 am

im_blue wrote:3.9/170 from USC is not getting HLS regardless of addendum.


This. And to make a long story short, this would be the admission officers response: "So uh... why didn't you take it again?" And in the 170 range, "half of my answers wrong on one section" is nothing to close to uncommon. When you only miss 9-12 questions total, the fact you missed 4 or 5 in one section is nothing amazing... it just means you are not unbelievably awesome at one particular section, which is usually the case with everyone...

r6_philly
Posts: 10707
Joined: Sat Dec 19, 2009 4:32 pm

Re: Harvard LSAT addendum for a 170?

Postby r6_philly » Sat Nov 13, 2010 11:01 am

Dream crushers! I am totally worth 185.




Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], dclaw93, m052310, Photomike2, Sinatra, smile0751, sublime and 11 guests