JOThompson wrote:whymeohgodno wrote:He has no realistic shot. If you think being waitlisted is a realistic shot then have fun.
Did you fail reading comprehension on the LSAT?
How do you interpret "I wouldn't rule it out completely" as an assertion of a realistic shot?
See the numerous points where I suggested an LSAT retake. It would have been pointless to encourage another LSAT shot if he was competitive as is. All I've stated is that OP's application isn't an impossibility, if you're willing to consider the several stories by other TLS posters on the matter. Vanderbilt plays the numbers game well, no doubt, but that doesn't mean they don't admit a non-URM reverse splitter off the waitlist once in a blue moon.
Thanks for the info captain obvious. Me winning the lotto 20 times consecutively isn't an impossibility either but what the fuck does that prove?
You must be the most worthless poster I've ever seen. Since when is pointing out that something isn't an impossibility helpful in any sense?