sub 150s and 160s into T10

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
User avatar
bk1
Posts: 18402
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm

Re: sub 150s and 160s into T10

Postby bk1 » Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:30 pm

vstraight wrote:There is a reason why minorities score lower than non minorities on the LSAT.

I just don't know what the reason is.


True, but the real question is why they score consistently lower across the entire range of the SES.

vstraight
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 12:44 am

Re: sub 150s and 160s into T10

Postby vstraight » Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:35 pm

bk1 wrote:
vstraight wrote:There is a reason why minorities score lower than non minorities on the LSAT.

I just don't know what the reason is.


True, but the real question is why they score consistently lower across the entire range of the SES.


No, the real question is why white men can't jump.

User avatar
nphsbuckeye
Posts: 124
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 1:06 am

Re: sub 150s and 160s into T10

Postby nphsbuckeye » Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:36 pm

JPU wrote:<--- 156 LSAT Non-URM @ t10 with a 3.3 ugpa

How did that happen fellow Buckeye?

User avatar
nphsbuckeye
Posts: 124
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 1:06 am

Re: sub 150s and 160s into T10

Postby nphsbuckeye » Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:36 pm

vstraight wrote:
bk1 wrote:
vstraight wrote:There is a reason why minorities score lower than non minorities on the LSAT.

I just don't know what the reason is.


True, but the real question is why they score consistently lower across the entire range of the SES.


No, the real question is why white men can't jump.

We've broken 10 second in the 100! Albeit the dude is French.

vstraight
Posts: 37
Joined: Mon Sep 27, 2010 12:44 am

Re: sub 150s and 160s into T10

Postby vstraight » Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:37 pm

nphsbuckeye wrote:
JPU wrote:<--- 156 LSAT Non-URM @ t10 with a 3.3 ugpa

How did that happen fellow Buckeye?


Just shows not everyone that goes to an ivy level undergrad is destined for good grades and a high lsat score.

User avatar
bk1
Posts: 18402
Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm

Re: sub 150s and 160s into T10

Postby bk1 » Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:37 pm

nphsbuckeye wrote:
JPU wrote:<--- 156 LSAT Non-URM @ t10 with a 3.3 ugpa

How did that happen fellow Buckeye?


Transfer.

User avatar
nphsbuckeye
Posts: 124
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 1:06 am

Re: sub 150s and 160s into T10

Postby nphsbuckeye » Mon Sep 27, 2010 7:52 pm

bk1 wrote:
nphsbuckeye wrote:
JPU wrote:<--- 156 LSAT Non-URM @ t10 with a 3.3 ugpa

How did that happen fellow Buckeye?


Transfer.

Ah. I was going to ask how many orphanages he started.

User avatar
Lawl Shcool
Posts: 763
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 6:44 pm

Re: sub 150s and 160s into T10

Postby Lawl Shcool » Mon Sep 27, 2010 8:56 pm

nphsbuckeye wrote:
JPU wrote:<--- 156 LSAT Non-URM @ t10 with a 3.3 ugpa

How did that happen fellow Buckeye?


Transfer and a lot of luck. Also, I credit most of my success to the Our R' Inn, but that is neither here nor there.




Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: candidlatke and 2 guests