Something weird about TLS

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
User avatar
Nulli Secundus

Gold
Posts: 3175
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:19 am

Something weird about TLS

Postby Nulli Secundus » Thu Aug 12, 2010 9:59 am

X asks his / her chances, X has good GPA but lower than 172 LSAT.

Unanimous TLS opinion #1: YHS is out.
Unanimous TLS opinion #2: Unless it is Nobel prize caliber, softs do not matter.

Paradox: HLS accepts ~220 people with lower than 170/171 LSAT score (25% percentile). Nobel prize is awarded in 6 categories, and except for peace, a maximum of 3 people can receive the award in a category in a year. (6*3 = 18) Assuming there are no people receiving Nobels during undergraduate and everyone applying to law school do so within 12 years of completing undergraduate, there are exactly (18*12 = 216) Nobel prize winners.

Which one of the following resolves the apparent paradox above?

a - The 25th percentile of HLS consists of every Nobel prize winner of the last 12 years.
b - TLS is wrong. (Somebody is wrong on the internet)
c - HLS is a lie. (So is cake)
d - Screenshots or it didn't happen.
e - None of the above.

Thanks!

(BEFORE A STORM OF AD HOMINEM, I DID NOT TAKE THE LSAT YET, HENCE I AM NOT THE X IN QUESTION)

miamiman

Silver
Posts: 1486
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 8:55 pm

Re: Something weird about TLS

Postby miamiman » Thu Aug 12, 2010 10:03 am

You're distorting the advice TLS gives and for what -- lulz? Ridiculous thread.

User avatar
vanwinkle

Platinum
Posts: 8954
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am

Re: Something weird about TLS

Postby vanwinkle » Thu Aug 12, 2010 10:10 am

miamiman wrote:You're distorting the advice TLS gives and for what -- lulz? Ridiculous thread.

User avatar
Nulli Secundus

Gold
Posts: 3175
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:19 am

Re: Something weird about TLS

Postby Nulli Secundus » Thu Aug 12, 2010 10:14 am

Where exactly is the distortion? Indeed I made this thread for lulz, but the replies confused me a bit, you claim the two TLS opinions I referred to are not meant to be used together or what exactly?

User avatar
vanwinkle

Platinum
Posts: 8954
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am

Re: Something weird about TLS

Postby vanwinkle » Thu Aug 12, 2010 10:18 am

nullisecundus wrote:Where exactly is the distortion? Indeed I made this thread for lulz

I stopped caring enough to respond here.

User avatar
ShuckingNotJiving

Bronze
Posts: 266
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2010 11:24 am

Re: Something weird about TLS

Postby ShuckingNotJiving » Thu Aug 12, 2010 10:19 am

nullisecundus wrote:Where exactly is the distortion?


nullisecundus wrote:Unanimous TLS opinion #2: Unless it is Nobel prize caliber, softs do not matter.



I understand your grievances, but the above is a pretty obvious distortion.

oakroom

New
Posts: 14
Joined: Wed Dec 05, 2007 9:52 am

Re: Something weird about TLS

Postby oakroom » Thu Aug 12, 2010 10:19 am

As far as percentiles go, there is no difference between the case where the entire bottom 25% of the class has a 171 and the case where the bottom 24% has a 170 or lower but the next person has a 171. The truth is somewhere in between and unknowable (other than to HLS admissions staff), but that accounts for at least part of the discrepancy.

Also, URM.

User avatar
kittenmittons

Silver
Posts: 1453
Joined: Sun Nov 15, 2009 1:24 pm

Re: Something weird about TLS

Postby kittenmittons » Thu Aug 12, 2010 10:20 am

You aren't as smart or clever as you think you are.

hi cc

User avatar
SullaFelix

Bronze
Posts: 113
Joined: Wed Jul 21, 2010 8:18 pm

Re: Something weird about TLS

Postby SullaFelix » Thu Aug 12, 2010 10:21 am

nullisecundus wrote:Where exactly is the distortion? Indeed I made this thread for lulz, but the replies confused me a bit, you claim the two TLS opinions I referred to are not meant to be used together or what exactly?


People are going to base their advice on probability. Especially if someone isn't a URM, the chances of being part of that lower 25th percentile is slim.

At best, it's a total crapshoot — if Harvard wanted, they could fill another few classes with students above that 25th percentile, and they have an enormous number of applicants to choose from with approximately 25th percentile numbers to fill those extremely limited spots. So telling someone they have a good chance would be awful advice.

User avatar
kazu

Gold
Posts: 1600
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:35 pm

Re: Something weird about TLS

Postby kazu » Thu Aug 12, 2010 11:48 am

oakroom wrote:Also, URM.


Plus, where did the 220 people come from? I think Harvard selects around 550 people each year, not 880, so the lower-than-25% would be closer to 140 or something.

Also, define "good" GPA. Harvard's median is 3.89. I have not seen that many people on here with 170~172 LSAT and 3.89+ GPA.

User avatar
Nulli Secundus

Gold
Posts: 3175
Joined: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:19 am

Re: Something weird about TLS

Postby Nulli Secundus » Thu Aug 12, 2010 12:32 pm

880~ = Accepted
550~ = Enrolled

094320

Gold
Posts: 4086
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 5:27 pm

Re: Something weird about TLS

Postby 094320 » Thu Aug 12, 2010 1:29 pm

..

User avatar
jcd178

New
Posts: 39
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2009 10:24 pm

Re: Something weird about TLS

Postby jcd178 » Thu Aug 12, 2010 1:35 pm

nullisecundus wrote:X asks his / her chances, X has good GPA but lower than 172 LSAT.

Unanimous TLS opinion #1: YHS is out.
Unanimous TLS opinion #2: Unless it is Nobel prize caliber, softs do not matter.

Paradox: HLS accepts ~220 people with lower than 170/171 LSAT score (25% percentile). Nobel prize is awarded in 6 categories, and except for peace, a maximum of 3 people can receive the award in a category in a year. (6*3 = 18) Assuming there are no people receiving Nobels during undergraduate and everyone applying to law school do so within 12 years of completing undergraduate, there are exactly (18*12 = 216) Nobel prize winners.

Which one of the following resolves the apparent paradox above?

a - The 25th percentile of HLS consists of every Nobel prize winner of the last 12 years.
b - TLS is wrong. (Somebody is wrong on the internet)
c - HLS is a lie. (So is cake)
d - Screenshots or it didn't happen.
e - None of the above.

Thanks!

(BEFORE A STORM OF AD HOMINEM, I DID NOT TAKE THE LSAT YET, HENCE I AM NOT THE X IN QUESTION)


Not sure this is an entirely accurate view of the TLS opinion either. I'm a 4.0/170/mediocre softs and I was told YHS should be my reaches, not that they were out.

094320

Gold
Posts: 4086
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 5:27 pm

Re: Something weird about TLS

Postby 094320 » Thu Aug 12, 2010 1:36 pm

..

User avatar
BioEBear2010

Silver
Posts: 745
Joined: Wed Nov 19, 2008 7:05 pm

Re: Something weird about TLS

Postby BioEBear2010 » Thu Aug 12, 2010 1:40 pm

First off, yes, people on TLS don't know what they are talking about. One does not need Nobel Prize-level softs to get into HYS with those stats.

But nonetheless, your argument is critically flawed. You do some cute number crunching on Nobel prize data, but you explicitly state the following:
"
nullisecundus wrote:Unanimous TLS opinion #2: Unless it is Nobel prize caliber, softs do not matter.
.

"Nobel prize caliber" does not mean "only Nobel prize."

User avatar
98234872348

Gold
Posts: 1534
Joined: Mon Dec 22, 2008 3:25 pm

Re: Something weird about TLS

Postby 98234872348 » Thu Aug 12, 2010 1:42 pm

I believe the typical advice given by TLS posters for folks with a 3.85+/172 is that HYS are unlikely but certainly worth the application fee.

I sincerely doubt any rational human would contest that advice.

User avatar
DoubleChecks

Gold
Posts: 2328
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 4:35 pm

Re: Something weird about TLS

Postby DoubleChecks » Thu Aug 12, 2010 1:48 pm

yeah for the most part, TLS advice on YHS has been pretty decent/accurate

your examples and misrepresentations are so poorly done that...oh man, iunno what to say haha; everyone's already said it for me

User avatar
KibblesAndVick

Silver
Posts: 533
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 5:29 am

Re: Something weird about TLS

Postby KibblesAndVick » Thu Aug 12, 2010 1:52 pm


094320

Gold
Posts: 4086
Joined: Sat May 16, 2009 5:27 pm

Re: Something weird about TLS

Postby 094320 » Thu Aug 12, 2010 2:03 pm

..

User avatar
JollyGreenGiant

Silver
Posts: 995
Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2007 9:12 pm

Re: Something weird about TLS

Postby JollyGreenGiant » Thu Aug 12, 2010 11:02 pm

kazu wrote:Also, define "good" GPA. Harvard's median is 3.89. I have not seen that many people on here with 170~172 LSAT and 3.89+ GPA.

That would be me and I'm currently rotting on the Harvard WL. Oh well, that's life.. eh?

User avatar
calicocat

Silver
Posts: 1089
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2009 1:29 pm

Re: Something weird about TLS

Postby calicocat » Thu Aug 12, 2010 11:34 pm

kittenmittons wrote:You aren't as smart or clever as you think you are.

hi cc

hi km :oops:

User avatar
skoobily doobily

Bronze
Posts: 247
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:40 pm

Re: Something weird about TLS

Postby skoobily doobily » Thu Aug 12, 2010 11:50 pm

OP: learn much you must, before time it is for LSAT

User avatar
kazu

Gold
Posts: 1600
Joined: Sun Dec 06, 2009 9:35 pm

Re: Something weird about TLS

Postby kazu » Fri Aug 13, 2010 12:20 am

JollyGreenGiant wrote:
kazu wrote:Also, define "good" GPA. Harvard's median is 3.89. I have not seen that many people on here with 170~172 LSAT and 3.89+ GPA.

That would be me and I'm currently rotting on the Harvard WL. Oh well, that's life.. eh?

Aww I'm sorry :(

User avatar
20160810

Diamond
Posts: 18121
Joined: Fri May 02, 2008 1:18 pm

Re: Something weird about TLS

Postby 20160810 » Fri Aug 13, 2010 7:11 am

SOMETIMES GENERAL TRENDS HAVE EXCEPTIONS I DARESAY

User avatar
AngryAvocado

Silver
Posts: 774
Joined: Sun Jul 19, 2009 11:22 pm

Re: Something weird about TLS

Postby AngryAvocado » Fri Aug 13, 2010 7:41 am

SBL wrote:SOMETIMES GENERAL TRENDS HAVE EXCEPTIONS I DARESAY


Blasphemy!



Return to “Law School Admissions Forum?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests