WIN OVER THE ADMISSIONS COUNSELORS

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
User avatar
GIBilled
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 2:15 pm

Re: WIN OVER THE ADMISSIONS COUNSELORS

Postby GIBilled » Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:11 pm

Don't worry, next cycle will be the "most competitive cycle to date." These schools are making millions of dollars on applications alone. No wonder new institutions spring up like weeds.

User avatar
romothesavior
Posts: 14772
Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:29 pm

Re: WIN OVER THE ADMISSIONS COUNSELORS

Postby romothesavior » Thu Jun 03, 2010 4:14 pm

GIBilled wrote:
Daytukrjabs wrote:
GIBilled wrote:After my e-mail, it took two days for the letter to travel iver 4,000 miles. Guess they couldn't notify me fast enough that I would not be attending their school in the fall. LOL


LOL. I was wondering where you went. You are truly an asset to this forum.



yea I was banned from the boards for the week.


For what?

User avatar
YCrevolution
Posts: 4714
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 1:25 am

Re: WIN OVER THE ADMISSIONS COUNSELORS

Postby YCrevolution » Fri Jun 04, 2010 7:46 am

..

User avatar
GIBilled
Posts: 38
Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 2:15 pm

Re: WIN OVER THE ADMISSIONS COUNSELORS

Postby GIBilled » Fri Jun 04, 2010 11:30 am

For what?[/quote]
Continuing to launch ad hominem attacks in one of the BP oil threads in the Lounge. GIBilled is advised that the next ban will be longer and/or permanent.[/quote]

--ImageRemoved--

User avatar
clintonius
Posts: 1239
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:50 am

Re: WIN OVER THE ADMISSIONS COUNSELORS

Postby clintonius » Fri Jun 04, 2010 11:41 am

Tautology wrote:
shock259 wrote:Arizona State got back to me a few weeks ago. I've literally had my app in for over 5 months.


Am I allowed to hate you for using literally superfluously, even if it wasn't an incorrect usage like I often see?

It's literally not as big a deal. (Also, yay for somebody else spotting that. I do believe we're classmates next year, yes?)

CMDantes
Posts: 420
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 2:37 pm

Re: WIN OVER THE ADMISSIONS COUNSELORS

Postby CMDantes » Fri Jun 04, 2010 12:36 pm

ITT: GIBilled is continuously a douche.

d34d9823
Posts: 1915
Joined: Wed Apr 14, 2010 2:52 pm

Re: WIN OVER THE ADMISSIONS COUNSELORS

Postby d34d9823 » Fri Jun 04, 2010 12:39 pm

CMDantes wrote:[strike]ITT:[/strike] GIBilled is continuously a douche.

FTFY

User avatar
tru
Posts: 421
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:40 pm

Re: WIN OVER THE ADMISSIONS COUNSELORS

Postby tru » Fri Jun 04, 2010 2:24 pm

.
Last edited by tru on Fri May 20, 2016 3:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Tautology
Posts: 434
Joined: Thu Mar 18, 2010 12:40 pm

Re: WIN OVER THE ADMISSIONS COUNSELORS

Postby Tautology » Fri Jun 04, 2010 2:28 pm

clintonius wrote:
Tautology wrote:
shock259 wrote:Arizona State got back to me a few weeks ago. I've literally had my app in for over 5 months.


Am I allowed to hate you for using literally superfluously, even if it wasn't an incorrect usage like I often see?

It's literally not as big a deal. (Also, yay for somebody else spotting that. I do believe we're classmates next year, yes?)


Yes we are! We should be friends so we can complain about others' word usage all the time!

Okay, maybe not.

acdisagod
Posts: 431
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 12:46 pm

Re: WIN OVER THE ADMISSIONS COUNSELORS

Postby acdisagod » Fri Jun 04, 2010 2:31 pm

I'm gonna laugh if they foward this to other admissions officers and you get your offer revoked. It probably won't happen but I've seen it happen before for UG admissions. There's a right way to express frustration and a wrong way and you chose the latter.

CMDantes
Posts: 420
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 2:37 pm

Re: WIN OVER THE ADMISSIONS COUNSELORS

Postby CMDantes » Fri Jun 04, 2010 7:19 pm

Daytukrjabs wrote:[strike]
CMDantes wrote:ITT: GIBilled is continuously a douche.
[/strike]

You people have poor taste in humor.


How is this funny? What I see:

Person with little patience thinks he's so special that he deserves his file to be considered with expediency, regardless of the fact that the rest of the thousands of law school applicants have to wait the same amount of time and typically paid the same fee. Is the admissions process a bunch of bullshit? Sure it is, but that's the game. Play it or don't, but don't go proudly showing off the fact that you acted like an eight year old throwing a temper tantrum with your little hostile email. The admissions committee wasn't offended or hurt by it, it's dumb, unfunny, and the school did a good thing immediately denying you. One less self-entitled douche in law school, imo.

User avatar
tru
Posts: 421
Joined: Fri Apr 02, 2010 3:40 pm

Re: WIN OVER THE ADMISSIONS COUNSELORS

Postby tru » Fri Jun 04, 2010 10:22 pm

.
Last edited by tru on Fri May 20, 2016 3:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
A'nold
Posts: 3622
Joined: Sat Oct 04, 2008 9:07 pm

Re: WIN OVER THE ADMISSIONS COUNSELORS

Postby A'nold » Fri Jun 04, 2010 10:31 pm

CMDantes wrote:
Daytukrjabs wrote:[strike]
CMDantes wrote:ITT: GIBilled is continuously a douche.
[/strike]

You people have poor taste in humor.


How is this funny? What I see:

Person with little patience thinks he's so special that he deserves his file to be considered with expediency, regardless of the fact that the rest of the thousands of law school applicants have to wait the same amount of time and typically paid the same fee. Is the admissions process a bunch of bullshit? Sure it is, but that's the game. Play it or don't, but don't go proudly showing off the fact that you acted like an eight year old throwing a temper tantrum with your little hostile email. The admissions committee wasn't offended or hurt by it, it's dumb, unfunny, and the school did a good thing immediately denying you. One less self-entitled douche in law school, imo.


+1.




Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], iluvlawschool and 8 guests