Everyone's in at WUSTL?

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
User avatar
dudnaito
Posts: 201
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 11:16 pm

Everyone's in at WUSTL?

Postby dudnaito » Mon Mar 01, 2010 3:56 pm

According to lawschoolnumbers.com

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/finigol/jd

wow... 167 seems to be the golden number. As long as you have a 167, it looks like you're in. I have a 167, and a 3.4, does that mean i'm in? Doesn't even seem like anybody's been out yet albeit in a relatively limited sample size.

BTW, what's the diff. between triangles and circles (in lawschoolnumbers)?
Last edited by dudnaito on Mon Mar 01, 2010 4:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Thomas Jefferson
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 6:32 pm

Re: Everyone's in at WUSTL?

Postby Thomas Jefferson » Mon Mar 01, 2010 4:02 pm

dudnaito wrote:. I have a 167, and a 3.4, does that mean i'm in?


Yes.

User avatar
finigol
Posts: 21
Joined: Wed Oct 07, 2009 9:21 pm

Re: Everyone's in at WUSTL?

Postby finigol » Tue Mar 02, 2010 1:04 am

dudnaito wrote:According to lawschoolnumbers.com

http://lawschoolnumbers.com/finigol/jd

wow... 167 seems to be the golden number. As long as you have a 167, it looks like you're in. I have a 167, and a 3.4, does that mean i'm in? Doesn't even seem like anybody's been out yet albeit in a relatively limited sample size.

BTW, what's the diff. between triangles and circles (in lawschoolnumbers)?


I Am Law School (And So Can You!)

PoliticalJunkie
Posts: 228
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 2:32 pm

Re: Everyone's in at WUSTL?

Postby PoliticalJunkie » Tue Mar 02, 2010 1:09 am

They don't reject people until later in the cycle - or at least that's what I'm told. Priority is with acceptances

User avatar
JCougar
Posts: 3175
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:47 pm

Re: Everyone's in at WUSTL?

Postby JCougar » Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:40 am

God, I hope so.

User avatar
dudnaito
Posts: 201
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 11:16 pm

Re: Everyone's in at WUSTL?

Postby dudnaito » Tue Mar 02, 2010 3:14 pm

PoliticalJunkie wrote:They don't reject people until later in the cycle - or at least that's what I'm told. Priority is with acceptances


still doesn't explain an all-green. I mean.. shouldn't there be yellows at least?

User avatar
emciosn
Posts: 392
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 3:53 pm

Re: Everyone's in at WUSTL?

Postby emciosn » Tue Mar 02, 2010 3:19 pm

dudnaito wrote:
PoliticalJunkie wrote:They don't reject people until later in the cycle - or at least that's what I'm told. Priority is with acceptances


still doesn't explain an all-green. I mean.. shouldn't there be yellows at least?


I would say that this and the relatively small (self selected) sample size would explain an all green.

User avatar
dudnaito
Posts: 201
Joined: Mon May 08, 2006 11:16 pm

Re: Everyone's in at WUSTL?

Postby dudnaito » Tue Mar 02, 2010 5:37 pm

emciosn wrote:
dudnaito wrote:
PoliticalJunkie wrote:They don't reject people until later in the cycle - or at least that's what I'm told. Priority is with acceptances


still doesn't explain an all-green. I mean.. shouldn't there be yellows at least?


I would say that this and the relatively small (self selected) sample size would explain an all green.


i know, but damn.... not a single non-green to offend the eye.




Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], Bing [Bot], echonov, Pozzo and 6 guests