Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
User avatar
reasonabledoubt
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:24 pm

Re: Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

Postby reasonabledoubt » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:26 pm

Kobe_Teeth wrote:
reasonabledoubt wrote:What a insufferable hypocrite you are.... "you're such an idiot it makes me embarrased that I could go to a school with someone like you." That's what YOU said. Then, I defend myself and ensure you that you won't have to worry about that, and you claim i've undermined what I've been arguing about? Lol.


You have been arguing against prestige whores for the entirety of this thread and saying that prestige has nothing to do with quality.

I am arguing that I am excited about law school at wherever I go, except would be embarrassed to attend school with you, a moron.

You then put down a possible school I might attend and bragged about your higher-ranked more prestigious school.

I said "congratulations" but pointed out the connotation behind your IU-B comment undermined your original point in starting this thread.

You then tried to play it off as not bragging about prestige but merely pointing out we wouldn't be at the same institution.

Nothing hypocritical about it, you just can't read, or write.


Lol - you're simply incapable of realizing my revealing I got into IU doesn't carry along (at least from my perspective) any of the "connotation" you claim. It's YOU, in fact, that aren't able to drop that connotation you implied because, again, you're referring to ranking. I never said IU was a better school than DePaul. The only thing I implied was that I wouldn't be going to school with you. Capiche? This has to be very laughable to someone who is smart enough to realize the irony of your response and how well it supports EVERYTHING I have tried to do ITT. Thanks for the win.

User avatar
JustDude
Posts: 354
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:07 pm

Re: Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

Postby JustDude » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:27 pm

I call flame.

No one is that stupid.


Plus he used a GWBush visit to defend his schools quality. On TLS???? heh...

Kobe_Teeth
Posts: 964
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:40 am

Re: Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

Postby Kobe_Teeth » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:28 pm

reasonabledoubt wrote:Don't worry Kobe, you're going to DePaul, I got into IU.



Someone tell me that bragging about IU-B over DePaul was not the point of this.

User avatar
JusticeHarlan
Posts: 1434
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:56 pm

Re: Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

Postby JusticeHarlan » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:29 pm

reasonabledoubt wrote:Show me where I claimed that Valpo was comparable to Yale or any other T-14.

Gladly. You did it on the first page:
You think about this: There are (even friends of people on these threads) Berkeley 3L's and grads without a job offer in sight while TTTT 3L's and grads in less saturated markets (I have several friend examples) are all set with secure jobs and offers.

I think it's worth talking about.... T-14 does not = instajob nor does it necessarily mean (a) better education (b) better long-term income potential (c) better lawyer (d) better anything, really.

In a recession, people, firms, etc, are looking for bargains.... "undervalued assets," so to speak. Lower tier grads might be considered undervalued assets. They also might consider the fact that a lower tier grad might be more likely to stick around for the long term as opposed to the prestige-obsessed top-tier grad who might skip out on the firm as soon as the economy recovers and he/she can sneak into biglaw.


I don't know how "T-14 does not = . . . better anything" is not an attempt to equate lower tier schools to the T14.

User avatar
reasonabledoubt
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:24 pm

Re: Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

Postby reasonabledoubt » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:29 pm

Kobe_Teeth wrote:
JusticeHarlan wrote:ITT: Someone uses the T-14 education of a professor at Valpo to prove that Valpo is comparable to the T14. Good Lord, what excellent trolling. Never seen its like before. Good thing that professor didn't take your advice and turn down Yale for a T4, otherwise you couldn't make your argument that a T4 is just as good as Yale.



I know, it almost seems as if OP is a clever spinner of logical fallacy threads but really he's just an idiot.


I just don't think, and it's ok, that you're smart enough to pick up on some of the purposeful subversion ITT.....

User avatar
vanwinkle
Posts: 9740
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am

Re: Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

Postby vanwinkle » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:30 pm

reasonabledoubt wrote:
Kobe_Teeth wrote:
JusticeHarlan wrote:ITT: Someone uses the T-14 education of a professor at Valpo to prove that Valpo is comparable to the T14. Good Lord, what excellent trolling. Never seen its like before. Good thing that professor didn't take your advice and turn down Yale for a T4, otherwise you couldn't make your argument that a T4 is just as good as Yale.

I know, it almost seems as if OP is a clever spinner of logical fallacy threads but really he's just an idiot.

I just don't think, and it's ok, that you're smart enough to pick up on some of the purposeful subversion ITT.....

How are you not banned yet?

Kobe_Teeth
Posts: 964
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:40 am

Re: Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

Postby Kobe_Teeth » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:31 pm

Me and everybody else.

You're not subversive. You're stupid.

You are transparently stupid.

User avatar
TTTennis
Posts: 346
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 1:12 pm

Re: Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

Postby TTTennis » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:31 pm

reasonabledoubt wrote:
Lol - you're simply incapable of realizing my revealing I got into IU doesn't carry along (at least from my perspective) any of the "connotation" you claim. It's YOU, in fact, that aren't able to drop that connotation you implied because, again, you're referring to ranking. I never said IU was a better school than DePaul. The only thing I implied was that I wouldn't be going to school with you. Capiche? This has to be very laughable to someone who is smart enough to realize the irony of your response and how well it supports EVERYTHING I have tried to do ITT. Thanks for the win.


I wonder if IU-B would rescind their acceptance offer to reasonabledoubt if they read this thread?

User avatar
JusticeHarlan
Posts: 1434
Joined: Tue Dec 15, 2009 2:56 pm

Re: Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

Postby JusticeHarlan » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:32 pm

Kobe_Teeth wrote:Me and everybody else.

You're not subversive. You're stupid.

You are transparently stupid.

I'm still of the opinion he's a brilliant troll. Damn amusing one, too.

User avatar
Ragged
Posts: 1509
Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2009 12:39 pm

Re: Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

Postby Ragged » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:32 pm

Reasonable sounds like a guy trying to prove that geocentrism makes for a viable model because it is technically possible. Very amusing.

User avatar
reasonabledoubt
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:24 pm

Re: Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

Postby reasonabledoubt » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:32 pm

JustDude wrote:I call flame.

No one is that stupid.


Plus he used a GWBush visit to defend his schools quality. On TLS???? heh...


Valpo is not my school. It was used as an example of what this thread was originally created for. Duh. G-Dub and his speaking at Valpo was an ironic nod to the sycophants who I assumed would like that sort of thing. I certainly don't, but I wasn't trying to express my personal take on it.

User avatar
reasonabledoubt
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:24 pm

Re: Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

Postby reasonabledoubt » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:34 pm

Kobe_Teeth wrote:Me and everybody else.

You're not subversive. You're stupid.

You are transparently stupid.


Well I think you're reactive, emotional, lack sense of humor, not creative and somewhat of a prude. Honestly, this is all pretty funny!

User avatar
JustDude
Posts: 354
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:07 pm

Re: Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

Postby JustDude » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:36 pm

reasonabledoubt wrote:
Kobe_Teeth wrote:Me and everybody else.

You're not subversive. You're stupid.

You are transparently stupid.


Well I think you're reactive, emotional, lack sense of humor, not creative and somewhat of a prude. Honestly, this is all pretty funny!


And which one of those qualities does not apply to you???..

oneforship
Posts: 1004
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 5:17 pm

Re: Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

Postby oneforship » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:36 pm

vanwinkle wrote:
reasonabledoubt wrote:
Kobe_Teeth wrote:
JusticeHarlan wrote:ITT: Someone uses the T-14 education of a professor at Valpo to prove that Valpo is comparable to the T14. Good Lord, what excellent trolling. Never seen its like before. Good thing that professor didn't take your advice and turn down Yale for a T4, otherwise you couldn't make your argument that a T4 is just as good as Yale.

I know, it almost seems as if OP is a clever spinner of logical fallacy threads but really he's just an idiot.

I just don't think, and it's ok, that you're smart enough to pick up on some of the purposeful subversion ITT.....

How are you not banned yet?

User avatar
TTTennis
Posts: 346
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 1:12 pm

Re: Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

Postby TTTennis » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:37 pm

JustDude wrote:
reasonabledoubt wrote:
Kobe_Teeth wrote:Me and everybody else.

You're not subversive. You're stupid.

You are transparently stupid.


Well I think you're reactive, emotional, lack sense of humor, not creative and somewhat of a prude. Honestly, this is all pretty funny!


And which one of those qualities does not apply to you???..


LOL.

User avatar
YCrevolution
Posts: 4714
Joined: Sat Oct 25, 2008 1:25 am

Re: Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

Postby YCrevolution » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:39 pm

..

Kobe_Teeth
Posts: 964
Joined: Fri Dec 18, 2009 1:40 am

Re: Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

Postby Kobe_Teeth » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:40 pm

JustDude wrote:
reasonabledoubt wrote:
Kobe_Teeth wrote:Me and everybody else.

You're not subversive. You're stupid.

You are transparently stupid.


Well I think you're reactive, emotional, lack sense of humor, not creative and somewhat of a prude. Honestly, this is all pretty funny!


And which one of those qualities does not apply to you???..


Blatant projecting. (referring to OP)

User avatar
JustDude
Posts: 354
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:07 pm

Re: Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

Postby JustDude » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:41 pm

YCrevolution wrote:
reasonabledoubt wrote:
Kobe_Teeth wrote:Me and everybody else.

You're not subversive. You're stupid.

You are transparently stupid.


Well I think you're reactive, emotional, lack sense of humor, not creative and somewhat of a prude. Honestly, this is all pretty funny!

I think you're going to have a meeting with banhammer pretty soon unless you drastically shape up.



Not cool. I guess I see why TLS is gradually getting so boring

User avatar
vanwinkle
Posts: 9740
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am

Re: Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

Postby vanwinkle » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:41 pm

JustDude wrote:Not cool. I guess I see why TLS is gradually getting so boring

Who are you, again?

User avatar
TTTennis
Posts: 346
Joined: Sun Dec 13, 2009 1:12 pm

Re: Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

Postby TTTennis » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:42 pm

vanwinkle wrote:
JustDude wrote:Not cool. I guess I see why TLS is gradually getting so boring

Who are you, again?


Come on, that's JustDude.

User avatar
JustDude
Posts: 354
Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 10:07 pm

Re: Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

Postby JustDude » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:43 pm

vanwinkle wrote:
JustDude wrote:Not cool. I guess I see why TLS is gradually getting so boring

Who are you, again?


Just a dude. Whats up

User avatar
reasonabledoubt
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:24 pm

Re: Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

Postby reasonabledoubt » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:43 pm

Alright skanks... I have to go to a dinner gathering downtown. No more TLS nonsense for now. Have fun with this thread in my absense, but please do try to get it back on topic, if at all possible. To those who take all this a bit too seriously, maybe you should get out of the house for a while. Some of you sound like you desperately need to hit the town. I'd even buy you all a shot if I could, even Kobe.

User avatar
reasonabledoubt
Posts: 516
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 3:24 pm

Re: Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

Postby reasonabledoubt » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:45 pm

YCrevolution wrote:
reasonabledoubt wrote:
Kobe_Teeth wrote:Me and everybody else.

You're not subversive. You're stupid.

You are transparently stupid.


Well I think you're reactive, emotional, lack sense of humor, not creative and somewhat of a prude. Honestly, this is all pretty funny!

I think you're going to have a meeting with banhammer pretty soon unless you drastically shape up.


Ok, I gotcha. This got off topic when I started trying to defend the premise of this thread to several angry mobs but i'll tone it down. Apologies.

User avatar
Borhas
Posts: 4854
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 6:09 pm

Re: Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

Postby Borhas » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:48 pm

EITTSDIAF

User avatar
vanwinkle
Posts: 9740
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am

Re: Rarely talked about schools on TLS...

Postby vanwinkle » Sat Feb 13, 2010 7:49 pm

reasonabledoubt wrote:Alright skanks... I have to go to a dinner gathering downtown. No more TLS nonsense for now. Have fun with this thread in my absense, but please do try to get it back on topic, if at all possible. To those who take all this a bit too seriously, maybe you should get out of the house for a while. Some of you sound like you desperately need to hit the town. I'd even buy you all a shot if I could, even Kobe.

reasonabledoubt wrote:Ok, I gotcha. This got off topic when I started trying to defend the premise of this thread to several angry mobs but i'll tone it down. Apologies.

Nice, dude. Real nice.




Return to “Law School Admissions Forum”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Baidu [Spider], bulldog1776, mrtux45 and 6 guests