is it really all about #s?

(Applications Advice, Letters of Recommendation . . . )
gabewatch

Bronze
Posts: 116
Joined: Wed Dec 16, 2009 1:15 am

is it really all about #s?

Postby gabewatch » Sat Jan 30, 2010 9:42 am

at first i thought it was all about numbers but then i got accepted to W&L with 17,000/year, and waitlisted at cincinatti and put on hold at cardozo. so maybe they actually read the apps and decide if they like you or not?

User avatar
gwuorbust

Gold
Posts: 2086
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:37 pm

Re: is it really all about #s?

Postby gwuorbust » Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:57 pm

perhaps an error in your apps?

I think the general consensus is that, yes it is all about numbers.

so far my cycle is playing our to the tee in terms of numbers.

User avatar
UFMatt

Bronze
Posts: 404
Joined: Sun Jul 26, 2009 2:59 pm

Re: is it really all about #s?

Postby UFMatt » Sat Jan 30, 2010 2:59 pm

My cycle is going precisely according to numbers despite having a killer soft.

User avatar
bighead715

Bronze
Posts: 273
Joined: Wed Jun 03, 2009 1:02 am

Re: is it really all about #s?

Postby bighead715 » Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:10 pm

dude nothing is rock solid - generally schools i would imagine would stick to numbers to hit their medians and try to game the rankings. however, i can also see schools taking a certain amount of lower number candidates that they really like.

anything is possible, nothing is 100%, and it is absolutely worthless to speculate.

User avatar
PhantaManta

Bronze
Posts: 276
Joined: Sun Sep 21, 2008 4:45 pm

Re: is it really all about #s?

Postby PhantaManta » Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:18 pm

Well, is W&L a surprising acceptance or are the other ones surprising denials?

Because you can get shocking denials. You just have to like, fuck up something in your app bad enough or commit a felony.

acdisagod

Bronze
Posts: 431
Joined: Fri Oct 16, 2009 12:46 pm

Re: is it really all about #s?

Postby acdisagod » Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:20 pm

Im all #'s no softs (basically) so I'll let you know how my cycle goes

User avatar
Chromakey

New
Posts: 89
Joined: Sun Nov 30, 2008 10:29 pm

Re: is it really all about #s?

Postby Chromakey » Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:26 pm

PhantaManta wrote:Well, is W&L a surprising acceptance or are the other ones surprising denials?

Because you can get shocking denials. You just have to like, fuck up something in your app bad enough or commit a felony.


[strike]Without knowing your numbers its hard to speculate[/strike], but if you're on the high end for numbers at W&L, you could have been YP'd by the other schools. Also if you are a splitter, absolutely nothing is guaranteed. I think that's when WE and other softs come into play big time.

EDIT: My bad, looked at the wrong profile when looking for your numbers.
Last edited by Chromakey on Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
vanwinkle

Platinum
Posts: 8954
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am

Re: is it really all about #s?

Postby vanwinkle » Sat Jan 30, 2010 3:35 pm

gabewatch wrote:at first i thought it was all about numbers but then i got accepted to W&L with 17,000/year, and waitlisted at cincinatti and put on hold at cardozo. so maybe they actually read the apps and decide if they like you or not?



It is 90% about numbers at most schools, but different schools weigh the numbers differently. You're a splitter. I was a stronger splitter (3.0/170), got into a T14 school and got held-then-WL'd at Cardozo. I also got offered a full ride at WUSTL, offered $$ at BC, WL'd at BU and UCLA, and rejected outright at Texas.

Are all of these things inconsistent? No, they just reflect which school value GPA more or have a GPA floor, and which schools value a really high LSAT. I didn't apply to W&L, but I'd guess based on your results that they're in the latter category, too.



Return to “Law School Admissions Forum�

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot] and 8 guests