Conditions for Cancelling All or Part of Your Loan
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 10:00 pm
.
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=15&t=185401
The reason everyone says that they are not dischargeable is because it is nearly impossible to convince the court that not discharging them would cause an undue hardship. It is technically possible to discharge them, but it's not realistically going to happen.TIKITEMBO wrote:presidentk1 wrote:i thought student loans were not discharged in bankruptcy
That's what I thought to, but I promise you I directly copy and pasted this text right as I was filling out the request through the government's website. Here it is through the same website (just not the check list form I had to submit.) I definitely know the conventional wisdom on this website is that they can't be discharged in bankruptcy. Granted, here it says the court has to find it would be an undue hardship to pay. All I can think in regard to that point is well, duh.
http://studentaid.ed.gov/PORTALSWebApp/ ... =repaying/
Courts use different tests to evaluate whether a particular borrower has shown an undue hardship. A common test is the Brunner test which requires a showing that 1) the debtor cannot maintain, based on current income and expenses, a “minimal” standard of living for the debtor and the debtor’s dependents if forced to repay the student loans; 2) additional circumstances exist indicating that this state of affairs is likely to persist for a significant portion of the repayment period of the student loans; and 3) the debtor has made good faith efforts to repay the loans. (Brunner v. New York State Higher Educ. Servs. Corp., 831 F. 2d 395 (2d Cir. 1987). Not all courts use this test. Some courts will be more flexible, some less.
In ths specific case it did because the woman was 63 and almost completely unable to even answer basic questions from the judge - she had to also make the showing that she wouldn't get better, which her age helped with and, of course, she had no money at all or she wouldn't have been in bankruptcy.btowncane wrote:I saw this story linked to ATL the other day. I guess diagnosis with Asperger Syndrome is one circumstance that meets the "undue burden" standard.
http://www.law.com/jsp/nlj/PubArticleNL ... dents_debt