Monday wrote:Am I the only one who found that line about how gays have made outstanding contributions to society a bit bizarre? Social interest of protecting individuals against discrimination should not be linked to this sort of analysis of social benefit, even if it's some tangential concern, since it can be misconstrued later.
YES YES YES I was like, soooo only the elite deserve protections? It's a-ok to discriminate against average Joes (regardless of race/gender/sex/sexuality/etc.) because they're not a mover and shaker?