... Forum
Forum rules
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
Anonymous Posting
Anonymous posting is only appropriate when you are sharing sensitive information about bar exam prep. You may anonymously respond on topic to these threads. Unacceptable uses include: harassing another user, joking around, testing the feature, or other things that are more appropriate in the lounge.
Failure to follow these rules will get you outed, warned, or banned."
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 12:46 pm
-
- Posts: 4102
- Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am
Re: LSAT Class to improve RC
you're only missing 11 RC at the most and you arent getting 165? That doesnt sound right. Like, you're looking at 170-172 almost every test with -11. Even if you missed, say -11 RC, 4 LR, and 2 LG, you're still looking at above 165 in all likelihood.Blueblades wrote:Ok, here's the situation. AA Male, Practiced for the LSAT for about 2 and a half months--gotta 161. I did not take a class, practiced w/ power score books. I'm averaging a 16-18/ 27 on the RC (How horrible is that!!). Can I imprive my RC, or this just what I'm capable of?? My Logic games have now reached near perfect statud, and so has my analytical reasoning. So my RC is whats holding me back from a 165+--maybe even 170.
-
- Posts: 25
- Joined: Wed Jul 02, 2014 12:46 pm
-
- Posts: 4102
- Joined: Sat Jun 28, 2014 3:04 am
Re: LSAT Class to improve RC
Well, the other sections are very learnable, and until you're getting 0 or 1, I wouldnt really say you were near perfect on anything. Most of the people here study LG until they're 0 every single time without question. So, you can get 3 easy points from LG alone. LG is extremely learnable, and I'm confident you can actually achieve perfection in this category.Blueblades wrote:ilikebaseball wrote:you're only missing 11 RC at the most and you arent getting 165? That doesnt sound right. Like, you're looking at 170-172 almost every test with -11. Even if you missed, say -11 RC, 4 LR, and 2 LG, you're still looking at above 165 in all likelihood.Blueblades wrote:Ok, here's the situation. AA Male, Practiced for the LSAT for about 2 and a half months--gotta 161. I did not take a class, practiced w/ power score books. I'm averaging a 16-18/ 27 on the RC (How horrible is that!!). Can I imprive my RC, or this just what I'm capable of?? My Logic games have now reached near perfect statud, and so has my analytical reasoning. So my RC is whats holding me back from a 165+--maybe even 170.
No, by near perfect, I mean i missing about 3-4 on average for the logic games, and 6-7 on the analytical reasoning. So I guess near perfect is a misnomer
For RC, the most common study tip will be to just keep doing sections over and over and over and over. Everyone notates differently in RC. Some people read the passage in 4 minutes, some in 2. Figure out what works for you, and do it every single day. Then, go over the ones you missed and see if you misinterpreted the passage or if you just confused the question.
- Clearly
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm
Re: LSAT Class to improve RC
Logic games ARE analytical reasoning. You mean Logical Reasoning.
- Clearly
- Posts: 4189
- Joined: Sat Feb 11, 2012 4:09 pm
Re: LSAT Class to improve RC
Now comes my productive advice. The Reading Comp bible is terrible. Order the Manhattan LSAT Reading Comp Guide. Not just any guide, but that specific guide. It's short and sweet and the best book this instructor has seen on RC.