Top Law Schools

applelover wrote:

Mojosodope wrote:

applelover wrote:

Mojosodope wrote: pm me your stats

Dude you've seen them twice already!.

Clearly I do not remember seeing them once!

Welppp

twentypercentmore wrote:What questions are you struggling with specifically? A lot of in/out games seem a lot more difficult than they really are (birds in the forest and mauve dinosaurs, specifically) because you have to play the spaces rather than try and figure out what goes where for each and every question.

For example, if I have a "If Bill is at the game, then Jenny is also at the game" and a "If Donny is not at the game, then Larry and Kellen are at the game" and there's only four "in spaces" you might be tempted to try and fit Bill in first (because it's easy to add Jenny for an easy space), and worry about Donny later.

You should actually do the opposite. Worry about Donny first. Is he there? No? This question just got a lot easier. Yes? Then the Larry/Kellen play a huge role in this.

You'll see stuff like, "If Caleb is at the game, and Patrick and Donny are not at the game, which of the following must be true?"

a. Bill is not at the game
b. Larry is not at the game
c. Xavier is at the game
etc.

So this now becomes easy:

Donny's not at the game, so you immediately add Larry and Kellen. Plus Caleb, that's three people. So you're never going to have Bill, since he'd require Jenny.

Furthermore, on super detailed in/out games (specifically picwhoring friends. effing Raimundo.) use the contrapositive to your advantage throughout all the questions. If, whenever W is in the picture, T and R are both out, and the next rule is: if Y is out, then R is in, you can contrapositive the last rule to when R is out, Y is in. Thus, W -> R -> Y, or, more simply, W -> Y

Mojosodope wrote:

applelover wrote:

twentypercentmore wrote:What questions are you struggling with specifically? A lot of in/out games seem a lot more difficult than they really are (birds in the forest and mauve dinosaurs, specifically) because you have to play the spaces rather than try and figure out what goes where for each and every question.

For example, if I have a "If Bill is at the game, then Jenny is also at the game" and a "If Donny is not at the game, then Larry and Kellen are at the game" and there's only four "in spaces" you might be tempted to try and fit Bill in first (because it's easy to add Jenny for an easy space), and worry about Donny later.

You should actually do the opposite. Worry about Donny first. Is he there? No? This question just got a lot easier. Yes? Then the Larry/Kellen play a huge role in this.

You'll see stuff like, "If Caleb is at the game, and Patrick and Donny are not at the game, which of the following must be true?"

a. Bill is not at the game
b. Larry is not at the game
c. Xavier is at the game
etc.

So this now becomes easy:

Donny's not at the game, so you immediately add Larry and Kellen. Plus Caleb, that's three people. So you're never going to have Bill, since he'd require Jenny.

Furthermore, on super detailed in/out games (specifically picwhoring friends. effing Raimundo.) use the contrapositive to your advantage throughout all the questions. If, whenever W is in the picture, T and R are both out, and the next rule is: if Y is out, then R is in, you can contrapositive the last rule to when R is out, Y is in. Thus, W -> R -> Y, or, more simply, W -> Y

I remember practicing the Mauve game. I hated it!

Got dinos perfect on the first try, its all about that deduction

Mojosodope wrote: I guess I could just check my PMs. Don't make me look next time tho I'm lazy

Dr.Zer0 wrote:

Mojosodope wrote:What time is the PW supposed to begin?

I think we agreed on 7:30pst /10:30EST

applelover wrote:

Mojosodope wrote: I guess I could just check my PMs. Don't make me look next time tho I'm lazy

Can't be lazy in law school bro, so you mines well break that habit now!

MoMettaMonk wrote:That PW game was always my favorite. I always pictured them as the Rugrats.

twentypercentmore wrote:

MoMettaMonk wrote:That PW game was always my favorite. I always pictured them as the Rugrats.

I mean, seriously, they're (supposedly) friends. Why the hell can't they just all be in the same picture together?

mandyjay11 wrote:I go to dinner and I come back to lemons slandering Beyonce's trendiness lol. Don't do that, I love Bey. She has a work ethic that's out of this world.

Mojosodope wrote:

mandyjay11 wrote:I go to dinner and I come back to lemons slandering Beyonce's trendiness lol. Don't do that, I love Bey. She has a work ethic that's out of this world.

Why is Jay Z so damn ugly though

mandyjay11 wrote:

Mojosodope wrote:

mandyjay11 wrote:I go to dinner and I come back to lemons slandering Beyonce's trendiness lol. Don't do that, I love Bey. She has a work ethic that's out of this world.

Why is Jay Z so damn ugly though

It's unfortunate. But he has some good qualities that outshine his looks.

Mojosodope wrote:

mandyjay11 wrote:

Mojosodope wrote:

mandyjay11 wrote:I go to dinner and I come back to lemons slandering Beyonce's trendiness lol. Don't do that, I love Bey. She has a work ethic that's out of this world.

Why is Jay Z so damn ugly though

It's unfortunate. But he has some good qualities that outshine his looks.

Like what his money?

Or his membership in the illuminati!

Mojosodope wrote:

mandyjay11 wrote:

Mojosodope wrote:

mandyjay11 wrote:I go to dinner and I come back to lemons slandering Beyonce's trendiness lol. Don't do that, I love Bey. She has a work ethic that's out of this world.

Why is Jay Z so damn ugly though

It's unfortunate. But he has some good qualities that outshine his looks.

Like what his money?

Or his membership in the illuminati!

0913djp wrote:Applying in the next few weeks with a sub-160, 3.8 GPA. About to prove all the doubters wrong. Will report back in a few weeks. Good luck to those retaking.

mandyjay11 wrote:

Mojosodope wrote:

mandyjay11 wrote:

Mojosodope wrote:
Why is Jay Z so damn ugly though

It's unfortunate. But he has some good qualities that outshine his looks.

Like what his money?

Or his membership in the illuminati!

Don't tell me u believe in illuminati. And no I think his demeanor is really sexy he hustles, he tries a lot of different things, he loves his woman publicly, etc

Mojosodope wrote:

mandyjay11 wrote:
Don't tell me u believe in illuminati. And no I think his demeanor is really sexy he hustles, he tries a lot of different things, he loves his woman publicly, etc

I believe in a group of white men that control much of the economic system.

Illuminati though, I'm not so sure.

Mojosodope wrote:

0913djp wrote:Applying in the next few weeks with a sub-160, 3.8 GPA. About to prove all the doubters wrong. Will report back in a few weeks. Good luck to those retaking.

Please tell me your gonna retake...just for shits and giggs

MoMettaMonk wrote:

Mojosodope wrote:

mandyjay11 wrote:
Don't tell me u believe in illuminati. And no I think his demeanor is really sexy he hustles, he tries a lot of different things, he loves his woman publicly, etc

I believe in a group of white men that control much of the economic system.

Illuminati though, I'm not so sure.

I feel like that's less a belief and more an observation. Kinda like saying "I believe that kangaroos exist."

Mojosodope wrote:

MoMettaMonk wrote:

Mojosodope wrote:

mandyjay11 wrote:
Don't tell me u believe in illuminati. And no I think his demeanor is really sexy he hustles, he tries a lot of different things, he loves his woman publicly, etc

I believe in a group of white men that control much of the economic system.

Illuminati though, I'm not so sure.

I feel like that's less a belief and more an observation. Kinda like saying "I believe that kangaroos exist."

Na not just that.

But I will save my beliefs on this type for a drunken discussion at ASW. Deal?

0913djp wrote:

Mojosodope wrote:

0913djp wrote:Applying in the next few weeks with a sub-160, 3.8 GPA. About to prove all the doubters wrong. Will report back in a few weeks. Good luck to those retaking.

Please tell me your gonna retake...just for shits and giggs

I will retake in June if I'm on waitlist at one of the two T-14's I'm applying to come April or May. I have $70K in savings and no cost of living expenses through my girlfriend. Sure, I'd love to get money at a T-30 or a better shot at a T-14 so I am definitely open to retaking in June if the situation is right.

0913djp wrote:

Mojosodope wrote:

0913djp wrote:Applying in the next few weeks with a sub-160, 3.8 GPA. About to prove all the doubters wrong. Will report back in a few weeks. Good luck to those retaking.

Please tell me your gonna retake...just for shits and giggs

I will retake in June if I'm on waitlist at one of the two T-14's I'm applying to come April or May. I have $70K in savings and no cost of living expenses through my girlfriend. Sure, I'd love to get money at a T-30 or a better shot at a T-14 so I am definitely open to retaking in June if the situation is right.

MoMettaMonk wrote:

Mojosodope wrote:

MoMettaMonk wrote:

Mojosodope wrote:
I believe in a group of white men that control much of the economic system.[/b]

Illuminati though, I'm not so sure.

I feel like that's less a belief and more an observation. Kinda like saying "I believe that kangaroos exist."

Na not just that.

But I will save my beliefs on this type for a drunken discussion at ASW. Deal?

See you then.

Mojosodope wrote:
global conspiracy talk