Top-Law-Schools.comTLS
Home
Law School
Admissions
Law
Schools
Law
Students
TLS
Forums
 
Forum Index     Latest Posts     Forum Search     Mobile (on/off)     Forum Archives     See Also: Rankings/Profiles   Interviews   LSAT Prep   TLS Stats

TLS would like to remind its users that it is unlawful to share or distribute copies of copyrighted materials. Click here for copyright infringement notification information.


All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Is LGBT status considered an URM by most/some schools?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 4:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2012 3:51 am
Posts: 2
Hi everyone,

I've read on several schools' websites that sexual orientation and gender identity is taken into account in the creation of a diverse law class. I was just wondering, on a more practical level, if being an LGBT person gives one any advantage in the application process. One could definitely argue that openly LGBT people are historically under-represented in the legal profession because (a) they're historically under-represented everywhere and (b) really anyone who isn't a heterosexual white male has historically been excluded from the legal profession. Anyways, any thoughts/knowledge/comments/questions/concerns would be appreciated.

Thanks!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is LGBT status considered an URM by most/some schools?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 6:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 14, 2010 7:06 pm
Posts: 20022
Nope.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is LGBT status considered an URM by most/some schools?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:28 pm
Posts: 411
I'd go gay for Harvard.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is LGBT status considered an URM by most/some schools?
PostPosted: Fri Mar 16, 2012 7:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jan 04, 2012 9:35 pm
Posts: 185
DaftAndDirect wrote:
I'd go gay for Harvard.


For that TTT? Gunners only go gay for Stanford.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is LGBT status considered an URM by most/some schools?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 5:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 5:32 am
Posts: 133
evan214 wrote:
Hi everyone,

I've read on several schools' websites that sexual orientation and gender identity is taken into account in the creation of a diverse law class. I was just wondering, on a more practical level, if being an LGBT person gives one any advantage in the application process. One could definitely argue that openly LGBT people are historically under-represented in the legal profession because (a) they're historically under-represented everywhere and (b) really anyone who isn't a heterosexual white male has historically been excluded from the legal profession. Anyways, any thoughts/knowledge/comments/questions/concerns would be appreciated.

Thanks!


It depends, and things can shift over time. Sexual orientation is becoming more and more a statistic in firm diversity, so I imagine law schools will follow suit. The whole diversity initiative is totally inconsistent and not really fair. But it's the best solution we have right now to let minorities break into the good ol' boys club that is most law firms.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is LGBT status considered an URM by most/some schools?
PostPosted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 11:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 4:28 pm
Posts: 411
1800calturk wrote:
evan214 wrote:
Hi everyone,

I've read on several schools' websites that sexual orientation and gender identity is taken into account in the creation of a diverse law class. I was just wondering, on a more practical level, if being an LGBT person gives one any advantage in the application process. One could definitely argue that openly LGBT people are historically under-represented in the legal profession because (a) they're historically under-represented everywhere and (b) really anyone who isn't a heterosexual white male has historically been excluded from the legal profession. Anyways, any thoughts/knowledge/comments/questions/concerns would be appreciated.

Thanks!


It depends, and things can shift over time. Sexual orientation is becoming more and more a statistic in firm diversity, so I imagine law schools will follow suit. The whole diversity initiative is totally inconsistent and not really fair. But it's the best solution we have right now to let minorities break into the good ol' boys club that is most law firms.


If anything, it'll incentivize those darn bisexual wannabe lawyers to get off the fence.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is LGBT status considered an URM by most/some schools?
PostPosted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 4:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 09, 2011 2:02 pm
Posts: 377
DaftAndDirect wrote:
If anything, it'll incentivize those darn bisexual wannabe lawyers to get off the fence.


:lol:

It doesn't give you URM status but it definitely opens the gate for the school's OUTLaw to track you down during your 0L summer and/or fall orientation.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is LGBT status considered an URM by most/some schools?
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 4:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 5:32 am
Posts: 133
DaftAndDirect wrote:
1800calturk wrote:
evan214 wrote:
Hi everyone,

I've read on several schools' websites that sexual orientation and gender identity is taken into account in the creation of a diverse law class. I was just wondering, on a more practical level, if being an LGBT person gives one any advantage in the application process. One could definitely argue that openly LGBT people are historically under-represented in the legal profession because (a) they're historically under-represented everywhere and (b) really anyone who isn't a heterosexual white male has historically been excluded from the legal profession. Anyways, any thoughts/knowledge/comments/questions/concerns would be appreciated.

Thanks!


It depends, and things can shift over time. Sexual orientation is becoming more and more a statistic in firm diversity, so I imagine law schools will follow suit. The whole diversity initiative is totally inconsistent and not really fair. But it's the best solution we have right now to let minorities break into the good ol' boys club that is most law firms.


If anything, it'll incentivize those darn bisexual wannabe lawyers to get off the fence.


I lol'd.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is LGBT status considered an URM by most/some schools?
PostPosted: Mon Apr 16, 2012 7:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 19, 2012 1:53 pm
Posts: 219
W&L


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is LGBT status considered an URM by most/some schools?
PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2012 9:37 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon May 07, 2012 6:41 pm
Posts: 17
DaftAndDirect wrote:
1800calturk wrote:
evan214 wrote:
Hi everyone,

I've read on several schools' websites that sexual orientation and gender identity is taken into account in the creation of a diverse law class. I was just wondering, on a more practical level, if being an LGBT person gives one any advantage in the application process. One could definitely argue that openly LGBT people are historically under-represented in the legal profession because (a) they're historically under-represented everywhere and (b) really anyone who isn't a heterosexual white male has historically been excluded from the legal profession. Anyways, any thoughts/knowledge/comments/questions/concerns would be appreciated.

Thanks!


It depends, and things can shift over time. Sexual orientation is becoming more and more a statistic in firm diversity, so I imagine law schools will follow suit. The whole diversity initiative is totally inconsistent and not really fair. But it's the best solution we have right now to let minorities break into the good ol' boys club that is most law firms.


If anything, it'll incentivize those darn bisexual wannabe lawyers to get off the fence.


^Lol, true. You better believed I clicked bisexual on every app that it would let me! It probably didn't make a difference for admission, but Ohio State gave me a diversity scholarship--I frickin' kid you not. I felt like I had cheated someone else out of it (as a middle-class white girl). I mean, besides bi and a first-generation, there is nothing "diverse" about me! My "diversity" scholarship talked about the intersectionality of my UG major, but that's about it. I'm not going there, though, so I guess it did get freed up for someone more deserving.

Moral of the story: it might not get you an admission boost, but it very well might get you a $ boost!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is LGBT status considered an URM by most/some schools?
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 6:27 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2012 1:45 pm
Posts: 16676
I replied to one of those Regent Law spam e-mails once with an "I'm gay." I'll let you know what their reply is. Still waiting.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Is LGBT status considered an URM by most/some schools?
PostPosted: Fri Jun 22, 2012 7:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 4:44 pm
Posts: 53
I think it's helpful at the margins. But certainly not to the same degree as a racial URM status. If you can incorporate it into a well written PS, that will boost your application.

One way it does come in play is 1L diversity SA positions and diversity scholarships. You can get these as LGBT.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests



Princeton Review LSAT

Search for:
Jump to:  
Login     Contact     Copyright Notice

copyright 2003-2013 top-law-schools.com • all rights reserved • powered by phpBB