URM status? Forum

[Mr. Matlock]

For the record, that person is not Native.

Damn.... Honestly, that bums me out.

[TexasDemocrat]

I see a remarkable resemblance.

For the record, that person is not Native.

I realize he's an actor. I thought you were posting this photo because of my avatar.

[TheCheerfulPessimist]

OP, do you intend on contributing to the Native community while in law school or with your legal degree? Identifying as NA and then taking your education and giving back to the community is one thing, but identifying solely for the boost without a thought of the other NA students whose seat you might be taking is quite another.

[Mr. Matlock]

OP, do you intend on contributing to the Native community while in law school or with your legal degree? Identifying as NA and then taking your education and giving back to the community is one thing, but identifying solely for the boost without a thought of the other NA students whose seat you might be taking is quite another.

If it doesn't bother NR, it doesn't bother me. After Northwestern fucked him over with the no scholly offer, I don't think NA URM boost works for shit anyways.

[TheCheerfulPessimist]

OP, do you intend on contributing to the Native community while in law school or with your legal degree? Identifying as NA and then taking your education and giving back to the community is one thing, but identifying solely for the boost without a thought of the other NA students whose seat you might be taking is quite another.

If it doesn't bother NR, it doesn't bother me. After Northwestern fucked him over with the no scholly offer, I don't think NA URM boost works for shit anyways.

I dunno, it's just the principle of the thing that gets to me a little.

[TexasDemocrat]

OP, do you intend on contributing to the Native community while in law school or with your legal degree? Identifying as NA and then taking your education and giving back to the community is one thing, but identifying solely for the boost without a thought of the other NA students whose seat you might be taking is quite another.

If it doesn't bother NR, it doesn't bother me. After Northwestern fucked him over with the no scholly offer, I don't think NA URM boost works for shit anyways.

I dunno, it's just the principle of the thing that gets to me a little.

Principle of things?

So it's fair that Blacks and Native Americans can get into better schools with lower GPAs and LSAT scores then a white kid would need to qualify? I disagree. I only want to check the NA box because they could give my spot to someone else who does check it (with lower numbers than me). The diversity statement is taking it a little far, because really I don't have much to say and I'm not going to make shit up, obviously. The point being, merit is merit no matter what your bloodlines are.

[Mr. Matlock]

So it's fair that Blacks and Native Americans can get into better schools with lower GPAs and LSAT scores then a white kid would need to qualify? I disagree. I only want to check the NA box because they could give my spot to someone else who does check it (with lower numbers than me). The diversity statement is taking it a little far, because really I don't have much to say and I'm not going to make shit up, obviously. The point being, merit is merit no matter what your bloodlines are.

FIGHT THE POWER GIRL!!!!!!

You rock!!

[20121109]

Principle of things?

So it's fair that Blacks and Native Americans can get into better schools with lower GPAs and LSAT scores then a white kid would need to qualify? I disagree. I only want to check the NA box because they could give my spot to someone else who does check it (with lower numbers than me). The diversity statement is taking it a little far, because really I don't have much to say and I'm not going to make shit up, obviously. The point being, merit is merit no matter what your bloodlines are.

Anyone else think its funny that OP intends to benefit from the same initiative she disparages?

[hiromoto45]

Principle of things?

So it's fair that Blacks and Native Americans can get into better schools with lower GPAs and LSAT scores then a white kid would need to qualify? I disagree. I only want to check the NA box because they could give my spot to someone else who does check it (with lower numbers than me). The diversity statement is taking it a little far, because really I don't have much to say and I'm not going to make shit up, obviously. The point being, merit is merit no matter what your bloodlines are.

So is this how Texan Democrats think

[TexasDemocrat]

Principle of things?

So it's fair that Blacks and Native Americans can get into better schools with lower GPAs and LSAT scores then a white kid would need to qualify? I disagree. I only want to check the NA box because they could give my spot to someone else who does check it (with lower numbers than me). The diversity statement is taking it a little far, because really I don't have much to say and I'm not going to make shit up, obviously. The point being, merit is merit no matter what your bloodlines are.

Anyone else think its funny that OP intends to benefit from the same initiative she disparages?

I just said why I intend to. They'll let someone else in with lower numbers than me who does check it, if I don't. Do I think it's fair? No. I shouldn't have to worry about checking a box on my application to get into my school of choice.

[TexasDemocrat]

Principle of things?

So it's fair that Blacks and Native Americans can get into better schools with lower GPAs and LSAT scores then a white kid would need to qualify? I disagree. I only want to check the NA box because they could give my spot to someone else who does check it (with lower numbers than me). The diversity statement is taking it a little far, because really I don't have much to say and I'm not going to make shit up, obviously. The point being, merit is merit no matter what your bloodlines are.

So is this how Texan Democrats think

What does being democrat have to do with this? I don't have to be liberal on every issue. College admissions should be based on academics, not color.

[Mr. Matlock]

Principle of things?

So it's fair that Blacks and Native Americans can get into better schools with lower GPAs and LSAT scores then a white kid would need to qualify? I disagree. I only want to check the NA box because they could give my spot to someone else who does check it (with lower numbers than me). The diversity statement is taking it a little far, because really I don't have much to say and I'm not going to make shit up, obviously. The point being, merit is merit no matter what your bloodlines are.

So is this how Texan Democrats think

Well, considering how whacked out their Republicans are, that really doesn't surprise me.

[TexasDemocrat]

Principle of things?

So it's fair that Blacks and Native Americans can get into better schools with lower GPAs and LSAT scores then a white kid would need to qualify? I disagree. I only want to check the NA box because they could give my spot to someone else who does check it (with lower numbers than me). The diversity statement is taking it a little far, because really I don't have much to say and I'm not going to make shit up, obviously. The point being, merit is merit no matter what your bloodlines are.

So is this how Texan Democrats think

Whatever. You're taking what I'm saying out of context. I never said it was a minorities fault. I'm just saying that the bar shouldn't be set higher for someone because they're white and lower for someone who is black. You either have the numbers, or you don't.

[Mrs. Jack Donaghy]

OP, do you intend on contributing to the Native community while in law school or with your legal degree? Identifying as NA and then taking your education and giving back to the community is one thing, but identifying solely for the boost without a thought of the other NA students whose seat you might be taking is quite another.

If it doesn't bother NR, it doesn't bother me. After Northwestern fucked him over with the no scholly offer, I don't think NA URM boost works for shit anyways.

I dunno, it's just the principle of the thing that gets to me a little.

Principle of things?

So it's fair that Blacks and Native Americans can get into better schools with lower GPAs and LSAT scores then a white kid would need to qualify? I disagree. I only want to check the NA box because they could give my spot to someone else who does check it (with lower numbers than me). The diversity statement is taking it a little far, because really I don't have much to say and I'm not going to make shit up, obviously. The point being, merit is merit no matter what your bloodlines are.

Yup... and after law school when you face close to zero obstacles towards reaching all of your law-related goals and having so much handed to you simply because you're a pretty blonde and that NA who had lower numbers than you, but clearly looks NA, whose spot you took faces said obstacles, I hope you feel good about this.

[TexasDemocrat]

Yup... and after law school when you face close to zero obstacles towards reaching all of your law-related goals and having so much handed to you simply because you're a pretty blonde and that NA who had lower numbers than you, but clearly looks NA, whose spot you took faces said obstacles, I hope you feel good about this.

WTF?

Yes, I get everything handed to me for being blonde.

[20121109]

I just said why I intend to. They'll let someone else in with lower numbers than me who does check it, if I don't. Do I think it's fair? No. I shouldn't have to worry about checking a box on my application to get into my school of choice.

If you feel so strongly about it, you could always up your LSAT and GPA as much as you can and then choose not to identify as a URM. There are people who do this...I just think you're being a hypocrite right now. You're basically saying, " I hate this system because people don't get in on their own merit, but if I don't partake in it I won't get into my top choice school." You don't see the issue with that? Seriously?

...And you completely missed the point of Ms. Donaghy's post.

[hiromoto45]

Yup... and after law school when you face close to zero obstacles towards reaching all of your law-related goals and having so much handed to you simply because you're a pretty blonde and that NA who had lower numbers than you, but clearly looks NA, whose spot you took faces said obstacles, I hope you feel good about this.

WTF?

Yes, I get everything handed to me for being blonde.

That's a stretch.

[merichard87]

Although I have my misgivings about the URM boost I think OP is missing the point of it. Its not just to get a couple kids who will bring Lil Wayne cds to the 1L house party. There are documented socio economic disadvantages in this country that come with being URM and so adcomms give applicants the benefit of the doubt that had they been given the same opportunities as your blonde self they would have equivalent numbers. I'm not saying the system isn't flawed (because it very much is) but your reasons for checking the URM box are in a word: silly.

[xyzzzzzzzz]

so what schools does the OP want to go to?

[Anastasia Dee Dualla]

OP, do you intend on contributing to the Native community while in law school or with your legal degree? Identifying as NA and then taking your education and giving back to the community is one thing, but identifying solely for the boost without a thought of the other NA students whose seat you might be taking is quite another.

If it doesn't bother NR, it doesn't bother me. After Northwestern fucked him over with the no scholly offer, I don't think NA URM boost works for shit anyways.

I dunno, it's just the principle of the thing that gets to me a little.

Principle of things?

So it's fair that Blacks and Native Americans can get into better schools with lower GPAs and LSAT scores then a white kid would need to qualify? I disagree. I only want to check the NA box because they could give my spot to someone else who does check it (with lower numbers than me). The diversity statement is taking it a little far, because really I don't have much to say and I'm not going to make shit up, obviously. The point being, merit is merit no matter what your bloodlines are.

Listen...umm (sorry had to scroll up) Texas Democrat.

You have the right to check whatever you would like and write whatever false/true/stretch of a diversity statement you want. Really, its your choice. Your family clearly has some "tangible or verifable" tie to the Native American community. But don't turn this conversation into a "well someone else will just check the box and take my seat" conversation. Realistically, adcomms select people who they believe will succeed in law school. If you weren't that person without the check, you certainly won't be just because you attached Native American to your application. Just ask the minorities who don't get in ANYWHERE.

So, check Native American be prepared with your fathers ID thing and tribal affiliation. Have fun and hope that I answered your question.

[d34d9823]

I just said why I intend to. They'll let someone else in with lower numbers than me who does check it, if I don't. Do I think it's fair? No. I shouldn't have to worry about checking a box on my application to get into my school of choice.

If you feel so strongly about it, you could always up your LSAT and GPA as much as you can and then choose not identify as a URM. There are people who do this...I just think you're being a hypocrite right now. You're basically saying, " I hate this system because people don't get in on their own merit, but if I don't partake in it I won't get into my top choice school." You don't see the issue with that? Seriously?

...And you completely missed the point of Ms. Donaghy's post.

I think the point is she doesn't agree with the system, so she's going to neutralize it as best she can.

And, OP, as I've said in other threads, if you can document your NA heritage, you absolutely have the right to use it. Bleeding heart types will try to guilt trip you into thinking that it's unethical. IMO it's a waste not to use a qualification as long as you meet the requirements for it.

[20121109]

I just said why I intend to. They'll let someone else in with lower numbers than me who does check it, if I don't. Do I think it's fair? No. I shouldn't have to worry about checking a box on my application to get into my school of choice.

If you feel so strongly about it, you could always up your LSAT and GPA as much as you can and then choose not identify as a URM. There are people who do this...I just think you're being a hypocrite right now. You're basically saying, " I hate this system because people don't get in on their own merit, but if I don't partake in it I won't get into my top choice school." You don't see the issue with that? Seriously?

...And you completely missed the point of Ms. Donaghy's post.

I think the point is she doesn't agree with the system, so she's going to neutralize it as best she can.

Really doesn't take away from the hypocrisy, honey. But w/e...she can do what she wants.

<3

[d34d9823]

I think the point is she doesn't agree with the system, so she's going to neutralize it as best she can.

Really doesn't take away from the hypocrisy, honey. But w/e...she can do what she wants.

<3

Is civil disobedience hypocrisy?

I know this isn't civil disobedience, but it seems similar to me on an abstract level: ignoring the rules because you believe in something different.

And I don't think what she's doing is hypocritical. If other people are profiting from an unfair system, is it "hypocritical" to profit also? Do you have to stand impotently on the sidelines whining about the unfair system or do you step in and neutralize the inequity?

[20121109]

I think the point is she doesn't agree with the system, so she's going to neutralize it as best she can.

Really doesn't take away from the hypocrisy, honey. But w/e...she can do what she wants.

<3

Is civil disobedience hypocrisy?

I know this isn't civil disobedience, but it seems similar to me on an abstract level: ignoring the rules because you believe in something different.

And I don't think what she's doing is hypocritical. If other people are profiting from an unfair system, is it "hypocritical" to profit also? Do you have to stand impotently on the sidelines whining about the unfair system or do you step in and neutralize the inequity?

Oh wow, you're really serious about this aren't you? lol...shame I'm not.

<3

[merichard87]

Its not neutralization if you are simply taking advantage of an awkward situation. And anyway I was under the impression that to get the NA boost you must show a connection to that background. Oh well, its a mad, mad world.