F'ing hypocrite. I took the high road in another thread and stopped arguing because you were being an asshole and you insinuated something akin to me being a jackoff.
That's the problem. You call it the "high road" because it was ultimately a massive dick-stroking attempt to prove you're right and above everything. I opted not to argue here because I have a presentation to write, there's basically no way I can win an argument in this thread, and there's no point in trying even if I did have a chance to win. It's not so much the high road as it is the "i cant be fucked" road.
But when everyone around you is telling you that you are wrong,
I'm sorry, but how exactly are people telling me that I'm wrong? Yes, a few questioned my source. I agreed it's shaky because, hey, it's anecdotal. My response was: If you believe me, great. If you don't, fuck you, do what you want. The only thing I asked kohinoor to do (even if somewhat douchebaggingly) was not to dismiss my claim merely because I don't have an asston of statistics to post here. vanwinkle got pissed because i didnt suck his dick when i made the request.
Am I wrong about transfers not being a good case -study? I never really insisted that I'm right. I just made a suggestion. When people disputed it, I sought clarification. Kohinoor's points were essentially moot since a) my 2L classmates are still gunning hardcore and b) people are experienced exam takers after the first semester of law school. A better argument against my suggestion would have been, "transfers might take uncurved seminar courses, so that might skew the results," but I digress.
The other argument I simply don't understand, so I sought clarification.
god damn this is so retarded haha (providing a thread recap because people cant seem to read it)