Pearalegal wrote:jerry jason wrote:What does "should" have to do with what actually happens?
You're so sad. If you're for real, its more likely that your less than appealling attitude towards women completely turns off:
1- Any attractive women with half a brain who are off having more fun with guys that aren't bitter whiners.
2- Any attractive women without half a brain who are off having more fun with guys that aren't bitter whiners.
3- Any woman period with a sense of self-worth.
So yes, I guess you're left with slim pickings. I know plenty of women at Georgetown, as you cited earlier who are hot, were in sororities (because apparently that means something) and didn't spend all their time in the library. Many are in relationships, many are not. None are desperate enough to pay attention with someone with such a pathetic look on the world.
As long as you don't directly state your view on women in these terms, the sad thing is that many women can and do date guys like this. They feel like they have something to prove, and they do it. In fact, there are a lot of women who are ironically turned on by the chauvinist attitude.
While I agree, in principle, about what you say regarding quality women dating guys who carry themselves as total tools, many girls' tool detectors are not quite as sharp as they probably should be.