Top-Law-Schools.com


Law School Articles
2010 Law School Rankings
Personal Statements
Sample Statements
Success in Law School
Master the LSAT
more articles »
Law School Profiles
Michigan Law School
Berkeley (Boalt Hall)
Yale Law School
Stanford Law School
Northwestern Law
more profiles »
Law School Forums
Law School Admissions
Latest Forum Posts
LSAT Preparation
Personal Statements
TLS Blogs
more forums »
More »
Pre-Law Advice
Dean Interviews
Other LSAT Tips
TLS Stats
TLS Programs
more of more »

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: BC vs. BU - Is there really a difference?
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:02 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 09, 2009 1:45 am
Posts: 108
superflush wrote:
Yep. What I have been saying all along


I wasn't debating you, I was backing you up. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BC vs. BU - Is there really a difference?
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:45 am
Posts: 1970
academiccricket wrote:
superflush wrote:
Yep. What I have been saying all along


I wasn't debating you, I was backing you up. :D


Ha, yea I know. :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BC vs. BU - Is there really a difference?
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:01 am
Posts: 144
Getting back to the original debate and away from the city debate, wouldn't it just make sense for most people to either apply to both and see what happens or visit both and see which one they favor? Everyone will probably lean one way or the other about which school is theoretically better but we aren't all going to law school for the same reasons (meaning, I don't think all of us want to practice the same type of law).

So would it not just be smarter for each person to make their own decision about which school they LIKE better (since they are about as close to equal as two schools in the same major legal market can be) and then each of us say that the school we chose is clearly better once we go there? Sounds like a plan to me.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BC vs. BU - Is there really a difference?
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:37 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:45 am
Posts: 1970
Unadilla Kayaker wrote:
Getting back to the original debate and away from the city debate, wouldn't it just make sense for most people to either apply to both and see what happens or visit both and see which one they favor?


Yes, this would make a lot of sense.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BC vs. BU - Is there really a difference?
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 9:01 am
Posts: 144
superflush wrote:
Unadilla Kayaker wrote:
Getting back to the original debate and away from the city debate, wouldn't it just make sense for most people to either apply to both and see what happens or visit both and see which one they favor?


Yes, this would make a lot of sense.


Thanks. And I agreed with your take on the city thing and love the avatar/screen-name combo.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BC vs. BU - Is there really a difference?
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:40 pm
Posts: 652
I think Alumni Stadium and Conti Forum are both in Brighton but the vast majority of the main campus is in Newton. And BC is more than 15 minutes west of BU by T: the B line is slow as hell, has service at irregular intervals, and breaks down all the time.

BC has a much nicer campus. BU's law tower is an affront to the senses.

BU, as a university, gets much more international recognition (it's ranked about the same place in US rankings as it is in international rankings, even with dozens of foreign schools placed in front of it). BC's probably better for Boston, but I'm not sure if that applies to national firms with offices in Boston, or just local gov't/firms.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BC vs. BU - Is there really a difference?
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:14 am
Posts: 42
I was persuaded by this thread and just submitted a BU app in addition to the BC app I had been planning to submit today.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BC vs. BU - Is there really a difference?
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 2:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Aug 18, 2009 12:42 pm
Posts: 38
As someone who lives 5 minutes by foot from BU law I can definitely tell you that BU and BC Law campus are certainly not 15 minutes apart. Traveling between the two could easily take 40-45 minutes (or more on a bad day). Driving a CAR between the two could easily take 15 minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BC vs. BU - Is there really a difference?
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 3:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 02, 2009 11:14 am
Posts: 42
The whole thread really made me think about this. I was thinking I would only apply to BC. But I live in the Back Bay. For me, I consider BU right down the road. I pass it if going to Brighton, etc. I think it would be very easy to walk from BU to the Back Bay area or live somewhere in between the two locations. I mean, at BU, you're basically by Fenway Park and all sorts of city activities.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BC vs. BU - Is there really a difference?
PostPosted: Fri Nov 06, 2009 8:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2008 1:23 am
Posts: 9
redsox wrote:
I think Alumni Stadium and Conti Forum are both in Brighton but the vast majority of the main campus is in Newton. And BC is more than 15 minutes west of BU by T: the B line is slow as hell, has service at irregular intervals, and breaks down all the time.


This is the answer. The Boston college main campus is right on the line of Newton and Brighton. The main academic campus is in Newton, but much of the "lower main campus" is in Brighton including both Conte Forum and Alumni. The Plex or the student gym is also in Brighton. However all of this is rather immaterial since the law school is in Newton and about 10 minutes away from the main BC campus and the Newton/Brighton line.

The B line is inconsistent but its not unheard of to be at BU within 20 minutes.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BC vs. BU - Is there really a difference?
PostPosted: Sat Nov 07, 2009 12:28 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 1:25 pm
Posts: 104
BC Law is really my dream school!!! I haven't visited it yet, but I guess I'll madly love it! My numbers give me a pretty good shot there and I applied EA. Hope they'll give me some money.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BC vs. BU - Is there really a difference?
PostPosted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 7:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2009 3:13 pm
Posts: 94
BC is more national, but BU competes well against BC for jobs. BC has the better name, but BU is gaining recognition. Visit the campuses and see which is better for you. Do you like the Oxford gothic building type atmosphere or the urban NYU type campus? This will be the main difference. If you want to work outside of Boston, BC's name will obviously carry more nationally.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BC vs. BU - Is there really a difference?
PostPosted: Mon Nov 09, 2009 7:20 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:45 am
Posts: 1970
Small Law wrote:
If you want to work outside of Boston, BC's name will obviously carry more nationally.


I think you have this wrong


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BC vs. BU - Is there really a difference?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 12:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jul 02, 2009 1:20 am
Posts: 12
I'm actually quite surprised by the anti-BC vibe on this thread. Both schools have their pros and their cons, but they are both very similar. BC has more of a college/campus feel in that it is a little removed from Brighton. It does NOT require a car...I knew many people who attended BC who did not have a car. You take the B line to the end and BC has shuttles running constantly from the Chestnut Hill Campus. Please don't let e car dissaude you from either...that's absurd.

BU has the higher rank, the renowned professors and the urban location. It is all a matter of what you're looking for. With comparable schools...it is a matter of your likes/dislikes and what you will make of the law schools.

Honestly, BC has a little more name recognition, but BU seems to do better in NYC/DC. Please just see both...although theyre like 2 miles away from each other...theyre worlds apart. Both are excellent schools. Lastly, LOOK AT COST. If One is substantially cheaper...take it, no matter what...despite rankings/who says what here/so forth.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BC vs. BU - Is there really a difference?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 1:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sun Oct 26, 2008 3:45 am
Posts: 1970
Aristone wrote:
You take the B line to the end and BC has shuttles running constantly from the Chestnut Hill Campus.


Yea. That is doable, but not ideal.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BC vs. BU - Is there really a difference?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 1:53 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:00 am
Posts: 838
BU is without a doubt the better known and more well respected school when you leave New England...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BC vs. BU - Is there really a difference?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 1:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 4:00 am
Posts: 838
Oh - and the idea that BU isn't in Boston... or even that BC is in the same vicinity as it... is absurd.

That's all.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BC vs. BU - Is there really a difference?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 9:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Mar 26, 2009 11:13 am
Posts: 915
Aristone wrote:
I'm actually quite surprised by the anti-BC vibe on this thread. Both schools have their pros and their cons, but they are both very similar. BC has more of a college/campus feel in that it is a little removed from Brighton. It does NOT require a car...I knew many people who attended BC who did not have a car. You take the B line to the end and BC has shuttles running constantly from the Chestnut Hill Campus. Please don't let e car dissaude you from either...that's absurd.

BU has the higher rank, the renowned professors and the urban location. It is all a matter of what you're looking for. With comparable schools...it is a matter of your likes/dislikes and what you will make of the law schools.

Honestly, BC has a little more name recognition, but BU seems to do better in NYC/DC. Please just see both...although theyre like 2 miles away from each other...theyre worlds apart. Both are excellent schools. Lastly, LOOK AT COST. If One is substantially cheaper...take it, no matter what...despite rankings/who says what here/so forth.


Don't get defensive. No one is being anti-BC. In fact, I think everyone conceded that they both have their strengths and weaknesses. I agree that cost should be the #1 factor.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: BC vs. BU - Is there really a difference?
PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 11:22 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jul 15, 2009 3:21 pm
Posts: 214
MidwestJosh wrote:
BU is without a doubt the better known and more well respected school when you leave New England...



There has been much debate on this. Can you provide some sort of source?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Derrex, gtbubblehead, Kohinoor, whoknows12 and 12 guests



Princeton Review LSAT

Search for:
Jump to:  
Login

copyright 2003-2009 top-law-schools.com • all rights reserved • powered by phpBB