A Big TLS Welcome to Belmont College of Law, 2011

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
User avatar
Matthies

Silver
Posts: 1250
Joined: Fri Aug 14, 2009 6:18 pm

Re: A Big TLS Welcome to Belmont College of Law, 2011

Postby Matthies » Mon May 17, 2010 6:20 pm

observationalist wrote:Thanks Matthies... I think that's actually a great point to raise, especially seeing as there will be a lot of employers attending who aren't necessarily biglaw hiring partners and who would likely validate discussion about non-OCI paths to work in and around Nashville. I think OCI plans (and non-OCI) would be a good question to ask the new Dean about. I've definitely been telling 1Ls this year how important it is to get a job in the city they're targeting for 1L summer, even if its unpaid, and then take advantage of being on location to network all summer. If they can get some interviews out of the way and potentially an offer from an employer they like before the summer ends, they'll be much happier if and when OCI doesn't bounce back this year. And as you've pointed out many times most schools don't place primarily through OCI anyways, which probably will be the case for a new school before it's even provisionally accredited.

And if LST makes any progress in this initiative, maybe we can reconvene in a few years and see whether greater information has any impact on where prospectives decide to go to school (or whether they find ways to cut down on their debt loads, either by working for awhile before getting their JD or by accepting scholarships instead of paying full tuition. If you're right that prospective demand for law degrees won't change enough to make a difference and that the only viable solution is to restrict access to student loans, then I will hop on a plane to Colorado and buy you a beer.

[edit: encouraging the school to be forthcoming about the need for students to do their own work also has the benefit of appealing to the school's self-interest... if more of their students learn the game early on and secure employment, it will help the school's employment percentages and boost the school's USNews ranking (or at least boost reputation for a new school that has all eyes on its success or failure).



Just to be clear, I'm not seriously proposing limiting access to student loans, but I do agree with you that limiting debt needs to be discussed (and I would add going part-time the methods you mentioned). I also think I need to make it very clear that I am not, in any way, other than the market (i.e. an individuals ability to land legal employment and perform well enough on their own to keep it) for limiting the access to, the number of, or the requirements for being a lawyer, especially if the primary reason for that is so that some lawyers can make more money by keeping others out of profession or limiting who can get in the profession. Just want to make that crystal clear.

User avatar
observationalist

Bronze
Posts: 466
Joined: Mon Mar 26, 2007 12:55 pm

Re: A Big TLS Welcome to Belmont College of Law, 2011

Postby observationalist » Mon May 17, 2010 7:05 pm

Matthies wrote:
observationalist wrote:Thanks Matthies... I think that's actually a great point to raise, especially seeing as there will be a lot of employers attending who aren't necessarily biglaw hiring partners and who would likely validate discussion about non-OCI paths to work in and around Nashville. I think OCI plans (and non-OCI) would be a good question to ask the new Dean about. I've definitely been telling 1Ls this year how important it is to get a job in the city they're targeting for 1L summer, even if its unpaid, and then take advantage of being on location to network all summer. If they can get some interviews out of the way and potentially an offer from an employer they like before the summer ends, they'll be much happier if and when OCI doesn't bounce back this year. And as you've pointed out many times most schools don't place primarily through OCI anyways, which probably will be the case for a new school before it's even provisionally accredited.

And if LST makes any progress in this initiative, maybe we can reconvene in a few years and see whether greater information has any impact on where prospectives decide to go to school (or whether they find ways to cut down on their debt loads, either by working for awhile before getting their JD or by accepting scholarships instead of paying full tuition. If you're right that prospective demand for law degrees won't change enough to make a difference and that the only viable solution is to restrict access to student loans, then I will hop on a plane to Colorado and buy you a beer.

[edit: encouraging the school to be forthcoming about the need for students to do their own work also has the benefit of appealing to the school's self-interest... if more of their students learn the game early on and secure employment, it will help the school's employment percentages and boost the school's USNews ranking (or at least boost reputation for a new school that has all eyes on its success or failure).



Just to be clear, I'm not seriously proposing limiting access to student loans, but I do agree with you that limiting debt needs to be discussed (and I would add going part-time the methods you mentioned). I also think I need to make it very clear that I am not, in any way, other than the market (i.e. an individuals ability to land legal employment and perform well enough on their own to keep it) for limiting the access to, the number of, or the requirements for being a lawyer, especially if the primary reason for that is so that some lawyers can make more money by keeping others out of profession or limiting who can get in the profession. Just want to make that crystal clear.


Got it... I apologize for misappropriating some of the other TLS ideas to you. I am curious as to the reasons why the bench and the bar would be opposed to a new law school, other than protectionary measures like keeping competitors out of the profession. But I want to reserve judgment until after the conference, since other than a few brief discussions with practicing attorneys in Nashville I don't know what the general opinion is. It could just be that the skepticism is based on how prepared they think this school was, and that once Belmont describes their plan in greater detail people may be more receptive.

User avatar
Dr. Strangelove

Silver
Posts: 557
Joined: Sun Mar 28, 2010 5:59 pm

Re: A Big TLS Welcome to Belmont College of Law, 2011

Postby Dr. Strangelove » Tue May 18, 2010 12:24 am

In all seriousness, I hope Belmont succeeds.

User avatar
jenesaislaw

Silver
Posts: 1007
Joined: Mon May 19, 2008 6:35 pm

Re: A Big TLS Welcome to Belmont College of Law, 2011

Postby jenesaislaw » Sat May 22, 2010 3:04 am

What does succeeds mean?

User avatar
Mr. Matlock

Silver
Posts: 1356
Joined: Thu Nov 27, 2008 6:36 pm

Re: A Big TLS Welcome to Belmont College of Law, 2011

Postby Mr. Matlock » Sat May 22, 2010 6:49 pm

jenesaislaw wrote:What does succeeds mean?

I'm not sure, so don't quote me on this, but I think he wants Belmont to form its own nation.



Return to “Choosing a Law School?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 12 guests