Money or rank? Forum
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:50 pm
Money or rank?
Hello-
I am currently choosing between Mitchell Hamline, University of St. Thomas and the University of Minnesota.
Mitchell Hamline & University of St. Thomas both offered 100% tuition
University of Minnesota offered 18k, current tuition is about 40k
I want to live and work in Minnesota, ideally clerk for a federal judge and then work at a large law firm. My dream in life is to become a judge.
My LSAT was a 161, and my UGPA was a 3.8. I took the LSAT once.
Do I take the money, or go to the school with the higher rank? I want to make sure I am successful in school, unsure how different the atmosphere is in a T1 school vs. T3/T4 but I thrive when I can make great and true connections with professors.
I am currently choosing between Mitchell Hamline, University of St. Thomas and the University of Minnesota.
Mitchell Hamline & University of St. Thomas both offered 100% tuition
University of Minnesota offered 18k, current tuition is about 40k
I want to live and work in Minnesota, ideally clerk for a federal judge and then work at a large law firm. My dream in life is to become a judge.
My LSAT was a 161, and my UGPA was a 3.8. I took the LSAT once.
Do I take the money, or go to the school with the higher rank? I want to make sure I am successful in school, unsure how different the atmosphere is in a T1 school vs. T3/T4 but I thrive when I can make great and true connections with professors.
-
- Posts: 3843
- Joined: Thu May 08, 2014 11:33 am
Re: Money or rank?
money or rank? why not both? you have great choices! (assuming you don't care about employment prospects)
GOOD LUCK FOLLOW YOUR DREAMS
GOOD LUCK FOLLOW YOUR DREAMS
-
- Posts: 3311
- Joined: Thu Sep 02, 2010 2:04 pm
Re: Money or rank?
UMN grad here - the U is a better bet for your goals. You will still need to be top 25% to have a good shot at a federal clerkship/biglaw job.
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:50 pm
Re: Money or rank?
I definitely care about employment prospects!! I think that's probably one of my biggest worries, but so is like 100k in debt.Hand wrote:money or rank? why not both? you have great choices! (assuming you don't care about employment prospects)
GOOD LUCK FOLLOW YOUR DREAMS
-
- Posts: 11413
- Joined: Wed Mar 24, 2010 4:54 pm
Re: Money or rank?
Consider retaking the LSAT for better options with significant scholarship money.
However, if your dream is to become a local judge (as opposed to federal), then often low ranked law schools can be adequate for securing state court clerkships followed by at least 5 years of small firm practice followed by running for judicial office. But, since you want to clerk for a federal judge & work in the federal system, then Minnesota is the better choice, but you should still retake the LSAT for more money & better school options.
However, if your dream is to become a local judge (as opposed to federal), then often low ranked law schools can be adequate for securing state court clerkships followed by at least 5 years of small firm practice followed by running for judicial office. But, since you want to clerk for a federal judge & work in the federal system, then Minnesota is the better choice, but you should still retake the LSAT for more money & better school options.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 20
- Joined: Wed Jan 17, 2018 5:23 pm
Re: Money or rank?
Retake. DUH! I got a 161 first time around and then incread to 166. Also have 3.8. got 20k at one T6 (need based bc post-WL late in cycle), and 20k off at 2 T14 (merit based bc early in cycle).
I studied for LSAT for 4 years lol, and it paid off, since I outperformed my #s with scholly $.
I studied for LSAT for 4 years lol, and it paid off, since I outperformed my #s with scholly $.
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 4:08 pm
Re: Money or rank?
Are we supposed to be impressedGreenlanpern wrote:Retake. DUH! I got a 161 first time around and then incread to 166. Also have 3.8. got 20k at one T6 (need based bc post-WL late in cycle), and 20k off at 2 T14 (merit based bc early in cycle).
I studied for LSAT for 4 years lol, and it paid off, since I outperformed my #s with scholly $.
I got a 146 the first time and a 180 the second and I'm going to Yale for free
-
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 3:48 pm
Re: Money or rank?
No, you want money and good rank. A few of my friends got full rides at top schools and were really happy about it. People who paid full tuition at lower ranked schools were not at happy. However, nobody really regrets ever going to law school because following your dreams is what's most important.
- KissMyAxe
- Posts: 365
- Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 10:01 pm
Re: Money or rank?
Stop flaming on the on-topic boards. You literally cannot go to Yale for free.Barney Fritz wrote:Are we supposed to be impressedGreenlanpern wrote:Retake. DUH! I got a 161 first time around and then incread to 166. Also have 3.8. got 20k at one T6 (need based bc post-WL late in cycle), and 20k off at 2 T14 (merit based bc early in cycle).
I studied for LSAT for 4 years lol, and it paid off, since I outperformed my #s with scholly $.
I got a 146 the first time and a 180 the second and I'm going to Yale for free
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 12:50 pm
Re: Money or rank?
Thanks for that, I appreciate it. I think I will go for something in the middle. I am more interested in following my dreams and being a good person than being the person with the best credentials. Maybe that's not the right mindset, but being a good and likable person matters to me.admin lawyer wrote:No, you want money and good rank. A few of my friends got full rides at top schools and were really happy about it. People who paid full tuition at lower ranked schools were not at happy. However, nobody really regrets ever going to law school because following your dreams is what's most important.
-
- Posts: 49
- Joined: Tue Jan 11, 2011 9:56 pm
Re: Money or rank?
I would not recommend the schools profiled above by Law School Transparency. It's pretty obvious why. Good Luck!
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2018 4:08 pm
Re: Money or rank?
Aren't you some ginger living in your parents' basement in South Carolina pretending to be a mistaken genius?KissMyAxe wrote:Stop flaming on the on-topic boards. You literally cannot go to Yale for free.Barney Fritz wrote:Are we supposed to be impressedGreenlanpern wrote:Retake. DUH! I got a 161 first time around and then incread to 166. Also have 3.8. got 20k at one T6 (need based bc post-WL late in cycle), and 20k off at 2 T14 (merit based bc early in cycle).
I studied for LSAT for 4 years lol, and it paid off, since I outperformed my #s with scholly $.
I got a 146 the first time and a 180 the second and I'm going to Yale for free
- ilovesf
- Posts: 12837
- Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2010 5:20 pm
Re: Money or rank?
I read on another thread that hamline is only good for food law. Is that what you want to study?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- cdotson2
- Posts: 853
- Joined: Thu Jun 18, 2015 11:06 am
Re: Money or rank?
on-topics don't exist anymore, didn't you get the news?KissMyAxe wrote:Stop flaming on the on-topic boards. You literally cannot go to Yale for free.Barney Fritz wrote:Are we supposed to be impressedGreenlanpern wrote:Retake. DUH! I got a 161 first time around and then incread to 166. Also have 3.8. got 20k at one T6 (need based bc post-WL late in cycle), and 20k off at 2 T14 (merit based bc early in cycle).
I studied for LSAT for 4 years lol, and it paid off, since I outperformed my #s with scholly $.
I got a 146 the first time and a 180 the second and I'm going to Yale for free
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Money or rank?
This board went to shit like 10 days ago. All the halfway decent poasters have moved to top-law-schools.comcdotson2 wrote:on-topics don't exist anymore, didn't you get the news?KissMyAxe wrote:Stop flaming on the on-topic boards. You literally cannot go to Yale for free.Barney Fritz wrote:Are we supposed to be impressedGreenlanpern wrote:Retake. DUH! I got a 161 first time around and then incread to 166. Also have 3.8. got 20k at one T6 (need based bc post-WL late in cycle), and 20k off at 2 T14 (merit based bc early in cycle).
I studied for LSAT for 4 years lol, and it paid off, since I outperformed my #s with scholly $.
I got a 146 the first time and a 180 the second and I'm going to Yale for free
- Sinatra
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2013 11:40 pm
Re: Money or rank?
You should never consider money. Always go to highest ranked school because they have better libraries and clinics.
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 12:09 pm
Re: Money or rank?
Minnesota is a great, nationally regarded law school. You should always go to the best law school that you can. If you go here, you will have options to potentially work all over the country--in prestigious employers--when you get out and the other will limit you. Employers assume that most attorneys go to the best law schools they got into. Money is a short-term consideration--the better law school you go to the more money you will generally make and the less the loans you take out will eventually matter.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2015 11:30 am
Re: Money or rank?
jbagelboy wrote:cdotson2 wrote:on-topics don't exist anymore, didn't you get the news?KissMyAxe wrote:Stop flaming on the on-topic boards. You literally cannot go to Yale for free.Barney Fritz wrote:Are we supposed to be impressedGreenlanpern wrote:Retake. DUH! I got a 161 first time around and then incread to 166. Also have 3.8. got 20k at one T6 (need based bc post-WL late in cycle), and 20k off at 2 T14 (merit based bc early in cycle).
I studied for LSAT for 4 years lol, and it paid off, since I outperformed my #s with scholly $.
I got a 146 the first time and a 180 the second and I'm going to Yale for free
-
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Fri Dec 23, 2011 4:44 pm
Re: Money or rank?
[quote="HarrisonBarnes"]Minnesota is a great, nationally regarded law school. You should always go to the best law school that you can. If you go here, you will have options to potentially work all over the country--in prestigious employers--when you get out and the other will limit you. Employers assume that most attorneys go to the best law schools they got into. Money is a short-term consideration--the better law school you go to the more money you will generally make and the less the loans you take out will eventually matter.
I'm sorry, but this is objectively terrible advice which, unfortunately (for whatever reason), seems to have become the norm around here.
The total non-discounted cost of attendance at U of M is roughly $230k. Even with your $18k scholarship (which I'm assuming is per year and has no GPA stipulations attached), you're still looking at nearly $200k in debt before accounting for interest, which will significantly increase the total amount you'll pay over the lifetime of the loan.
That kind of debt load, combined with the career and earnings prospects for the average student graduating from Minnesota, is in no way a "short-term consideration." Instead, you'd be looking at a potentially crippling amount of debt that will follow you for a huge portion of your remaining life.
One more note: a U of M degree isn't at all portable beyond Minneapolis/Minnesota and to suggest otherwise is laughable.
I'm sorry, but this is objectively terrible advice which, unfortunately (for whatever reason), seems to have become the norm around here.
The total non-discounted cost of attendance at U of M is roughly $230k. Even with your $18k scholarship (which I'm assuming is per year and has no GPA stipulations attached), you're still looking at nearly $200k in debt before accounting for interest, which will significantly increase the total amount you'll pay over the lifetime of the loan.
That kind of debt load, combined with the career and earnings prospects for the average student graduating from Minnesota, is in no way a "short-term consideration." Instead, you'd be looking at a potentially crippling amount of debt that will follow you for a huge portion of your remaining life.
One more note: a U of M degree isn't at all portable beyond Minneapolis/Minnesota and to suggest otherwise is laughable.
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: Money or rank?
LSthrowawy2014 wrote:jbagelboy wrote:cdotson2 wrote:on-topics don't exist anymore, didn't you get the news?KissMyAxe wrote:Stop flaming on the on-topic boards. You literally cannot go to Yale for free.Barney Fritz wrote:Are we supposed to be impressedGreenlanpern wrote:Retake. DUH! I got a 161 first time around and then incread to 166. Also have 3.8. got 20k at one T6 (need based bc post-WL late in cycle), and 20k off at 2 T14 (merit based bc early in cycle).
I studied for LSAT for 4 years lol, and it paid off, since I outperformed my #s with scholly $.
I got a 146 the first time and a 180 the second and I'm going to Yale for free
- Pomeranian
- Posts: 306
- Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 10:23 pm
Re: Money or rank?
jbagelboy wrote:LSthrowawy2014 wrote:jbagelboy wrote:cdotson2 wrote:on-topics don't exist anymore, didn't you get the news?KissMyAxe wrote:Stop flaming on the on-topic boards. You literally cannot go to Yale for free.Barney Fritz wrote:Are we supposed to be impressedGreenlanpern wrote:Retake. DUH! I got a 161 first time around and then incread to 166. Also have 3.8. got 20k at one T6 (need based bc post-WL late in cycle), and 20k off at 2 T14 (merit based bc early in cycle).
I studied for LSAT for 4 years lol, and it paid off, since I outperformed my #s with scholly $.
I got a 146 the first time and a 180 the second and I'm going to Yale for free
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Mr. Archer
- Posts: 270
- Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2014 7:08 pm
Re: Money or rank?
So much no. Minnesota is not even nationally known to have a law school. Cost is always a consideration for the long-term. Go home, you're drunk.HarrisonBarnes wrote:Minnesota is a great, nationally regarded law school. You should always go to the best law school that you can. If you go here, you will have options to potentially work all over the country--in prestigious employers--when you get out and the other will limit you. Employers assume that most attorneys go to the best law schools they got into. Money is a short-term consideration--the better law school you go to the more money you will generally make and the less the loans you take out will eventually matter.
- Sinatra
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Tue Jun 04, 2013 11:40 pm
Re: Money or rank?
Quit flaming the on topics. Our lord and Savior would not provide false information.Mr. Archer wrote:So much no. Minnesota is not even nationally known to have a law school. Cost is always a consideration for the long-term. Go home, you're drunk.HarrisonBarnes wrote:Minnesota is a great, nationally regarded law school. You should always go to the best law school that you can. If you go here, you will have options to potentially work all over the country--in prestigious employers--when you get out and the other will limit you. Employers assume that most attorneys go to the best law schools they got into. Money is a short-term consideration--the better law school you go to the more money you will generally make and the less the loans you take out will eventually matter.
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: Sat Feb 03, 2018 6:42 pm
Re: Money or rank?
Mr. Archer wrote:So muchHarrisonBarnes wrote:Minnesota is a great, nationally regarded law school. You should always go to the best law school that you can. If you go here, you will have options to potentially work all over the country--in prestigious employers--when you get out and the other will limit you. Employers assume that most attorneys go to the best law schools they got into. Money is a short-term consideration--the better law school you go to the more money you will generally make and the less the loans you take out will eventually matter.no.yes!
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login