Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
User avatar
amta

Platinum
Posts: 9459
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 1:40 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby amta » Thu Apr 13, 2017 4:38 pm

dietcoke1 wrote:I've also heard this. Haven't they gotten in trouble by taking too many OOS students so they can shell out more tuition? Being stingy with scholly offers and raising class sizes seems like the best way to bring yourself down in the rankings


yeah. the UC system is fucked and poorly run.

eta: grats on 1000 posts.

Monday

Silver
Posts: 784
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 9:36 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby Monday » Thu Apr 13, 2017 4:44 pm

.
Last edited by Monday on Thu May 11, 2017 12:48 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
btruj777

Bronze
Posts: 332
Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2016 9:31 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby btruj777 » Thu Apr 13, 2017 4:50 pm

I think NU's link is taking it to the 2015 report, or at least it was.

User avatar
dietcoke1

Silver
Posts: 1326
Joined: Tue Mar 08, 2016 8:18 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby dietcoke1 » Thu Apr 13, 2017 4:51 pm

amta wrote:
dietcoke1 wrote:I've also heard this. Haven't they gotten in trouble by taking too many OOS students so they can shell out more tuition? Being stingy with scholly offers and raising class sizes seems like the best way to bring yourself down in the rankings


yeah. the UC system is fucked and poorly run.

eta: grats on 1000 posts.


thanks! looking forward to that flair when I decide on a school

Monday

Silver
Posts: 784
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 9:36 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby Monday » Thu Apr 13, 2017 4:53 pm

.
Last edited by Monday on Thu May 11, 2017 12:48 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
SkinnyFat

New
Posts: 17
Joined: Mon May 16, 2016 4:48 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby SkinnyFat » Thu Apr 13, 2017 4:56 pm

Dunno if this has been posted yet, but;

UNC: 44+12=56/229= 24.45%
Last year: 51+12=63/232= 27.16
∆= -2.71

thatblondegirl

Bronze
Posts: 203
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2017 12:47 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby thatblondegirl » Thu Apr 13, 2017 5:01 pm

amta wrote:
dietcoke1 wrote:I've also heard this. Haven't they gotten in trouble by taking too many OOS students so they can shell out more tuition? Being stingy with scholly offers and raising class sizes seems like the best way to bring yourself down in the rankings


yeah. the UC system is fucked and poorly run.

This is too true. I still remember the campus outrage when they raised tuition 30% in one year.

User avatar
Pomeranian

Bronze
Posts: 264
Joined: Thu May 05, 2016 10:23 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby Pomeranian » Thu Apr 13, 2017 5:01 pm


BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby BigZuck » Thu Apr 13, 2017 5:38 pm

guybourdin wrote:
TLS_Dreamer wrote:Why is everyone shitting on UT for not releasing scores but not NYU?


I think mostly b.c of Zuck

I think if brut (RIP) were here we'd all be singing a different tune

cannibal ox

Gold
Posts: 4075
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 11:49 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby cannibal ox » Thu Apr 13, 2017 5:45 pm

SkinnyFat wrote:Dunno if this has been posted yet, but;

UNC: 44+12=56/229= 24.45%
Last year: 51+12=63/232= 27.16
∆= -2.71


Link

Nebby wrote:

Pure Applesauce

Bronze
Posts: 208
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 5:30 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby Pure Applesauce » Thu Apr 13, 2017 6:04 pm

BigZuck wrote:
guybourdin wrote:
TLS_Dreamer wrote:Why is everyone shitting on UT for not releasing scores but not NYU?


I think mostly b.c of Zuck

I think if brut (RIP) were here we'd all be singing a different tune


i wish we could hear burt's take

are we waiting only on NYU, USC, and UT?

cannibal ox

Gold
Posts: 4075
Joined: Wed Jun 12, 2013 11:49 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby cannibal ox » Thu Apr 13, 2017 6:21 pm

I believe USC has their ASW this weekend, so that's probably why they haven't released their stats yet.

UTTTTTTTT has no excuse.

Lawcat11

Bronze
Posts: 398
Joined: Fri Jul 04, 2014 9:38 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby Lawcat11 » Thu Apr 13, 2017 6:23 pm


BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby BigZuck » Thu Apr 13, 2017 6:33 pm

Looks like UT is up. Somebody else post it, I'm too scared.

goldenbear2020

Silver
Posts: 631
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2016 11:47 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby goldenbear2020 » Thu Apr 13, 2017 6:36 pm

BigZuck wrote:Looks like UT is up. Somebody else post it, I'm too scared.

163 / 362 = 45.0%

curry1

Silver
Posts: 879
Joined: Fri May 15, 2015 11:41 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby curry1 » Thu Apr 13, 2017 6:36 pm

BigZuck wrote:Looks like UT is up. Somebody else post it, I'm too scared.


https://law.utexas.edu/wp-content/uploa ... of2016.pdf

45.0%, oddly high # of fed clerks, although overall TTT20 numbers fitting for UTTT

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby BigZuck » Thu Apr 13, 2017 6:38 pm

BigZuck wrote:(resigns self to 42% big law+federal clerk, afraid won't be able to show his face on TLS again like so many Nebbys)

BUMP

grades??

Silver
Posts: 985
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:55 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby grades?? » Thu Apr 13, 2017 6:38 pm

goldenbear2020 wrote:
BigZuck wrote:Looks like UT is up. Somebody else post it, I'm too scared.

163 / 362 = 45.0%


Jesus not even 50%? Even GT has the balls to be over 50%. UTTTTTT for life. It is now confirmed t11, then Berkeley Michigan, then Georgetown and UTTTT I guess can hang out outside the cool kids group.

User avatar
amta

Platinum
Posts: 9459
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 1:40 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby amta » Thu Apr 13, 2017 6:39 pm

goldenbear2020 wrote:
BigZuck wrote:Looks like UT is up. Somebody else post it, I'm too scared.

163 / 362 = 45.0%


up from .424

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby BigZuck » Thu Apr 13, 2017 6:39 pm

curry1 wrote:
BigZuck wrote:Looks like UT is up. Somebody else post it, I'm too scared.


https://law.utexas.edu/wp-content/uploa ... of2016.pdf

45.0%, oddly high # of fed clerks, although overall TTT20 numbers fitting for UTTT

Isn't 9% pretty in line with what it has been lately?

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby BigZuck » Thu Apr 13, 2017 6:40 pm

amta wrote:
goldenbear2020 wrote:
BigZuck wrote:Looks like UT is up. Somebody else post it, I'm too scared.

163 / 362 = 45.0%


up from .424

Sad!

User avatar
amta

Platinum
Posts: 9459
Joined: Thu Oct 22, 2015 1:40 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby amta » Thu Apr 13, 2017 6:40 pm

grades?? wrote:
goldenbear2020 wrote:
BigZuck wrote:Looks like UT is up. Somebody else post it, I'm too scared.

163 / 362 = 45.0%


Jesus not even 50%? Even GT has the balls to be over 50%. UTTTTTT for life. It is now confirmed t11, then Berkeley Michigan, then Georgetown and UTTTT I guess can hang out outside the cool kids group.


please provide excuses, bigzuck.

Pure Applesauce

Bronze
Posts: 208
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 5:30 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby Pure Applesauce » Thu Apr 13, 2017 6:42 pm

grades?? wrote:
goldenbear2020 wrote:
BigZuck wrote:Looks like UT is up. Somebody else post it, I'm too scared.

163 / 362 = 45.0%


Jesus not even 50%? Even GT has the balls to be over 50%. UTTTTTT for life. It is now confirmed t11, then Berkeley Michigan, then Georgetown and UTTTT I guess can hang out outside the cool kids group.


Vandy trolling is egregious

BigZuck

Diamond
Posts: 11730
Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby BigZuck » Thu Apr 13, 2017 6:43 pm

amta wrote:
grades?? wrote:
goldenbear2020 wrote:
BigZuck wrote:Looks like UT is up. Somebody else post it, I'm too scared.

163 / 362 = 45.0%


Jesus not even 50%? Even GT has the balls to be over 50%. UTTTTTT for life. It is now confirmed t11, then Berkeley Michigan, then Georgetown and UTTTT I guess can hang out outside the cool kids group.


please provide excuses, bigzuck.

I don't actually have any, I was just trying to reverse jinx.

Lol Nebby and Michigan though am I right guys?

grades??

Silver
Posts: 985
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:55 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby grades?? » Thu Apr 13, 2017 6:43 pm

Pure Applesauce wrote:
grades?? wrote:
goldenbear2020 wrote:
BigZuck wrote:Looks like UT is up. Somebody else post it, I'm too scared.

163 / 362 = 45.0%


Jesus not even 50%? Even GT has the balls to be over 50%. UTTTTTT for life. It is now confirmed t11, then Berkeley Michigan, then Georgetown and UTTTT I guess can hang out outside the cool kids group.


Vandy trolling is egregious


Sure Vandy can join the t20 group of gt, UT and WUSTL. A group of regional law schools, cool.



Return to “Choosing a Law School?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: BrainsyK and 15 guests