Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
User avatar
CR7
Posts: 71
Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2017 10:09 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby CR7 » Thu Apr 06, 2017 6:43 pm

Anyone have data for Michigan, NYU, and Georgetown

User avatar
dm1683
Posts: 611
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2016 9:57 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby dm1683 » Thu Apr 06, 2017 7:20 pm

waiting for my tt UG school's stats to come out so I can convince a friend of mine not to go.

User avatar
runinthefront
Posts: 1797
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 2:18 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby runinthefront » Thu Apr 06, 2017 7:34 pm

Stanford

https://www-cdn.law.stanford.edu/wp-con ... tats-1.pdf

Total grads: 183
Biglaw: 92 = 50.2%
Fed Clerkships: 45 = 24.5%

74.7% in BL/FC

(side note: Stanford does a great job detailing where its "JD Advantage"/PI graduates go. Kudos to them.)

kingpin101
Posts: 319
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 5:24 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby kingpin101 » Thu Apr 06, 2017 10:53 pm

runinthefront wrote:Stanford

https://www-cdn.law.stanford.edu/wp-con ... tats-1.pdf

Total grads: 183
Biglaw: 92 = 50.2%
Fed Clerkships: 45 = 24.5%

74.7% in BL/FC

(side note: Stanford does a great job detailing where its "JD Advantage"/PI graduates go. Kudos to them.)

Yeah it's definite proof that at top schools (but who knows how top) business/industry jobs are actually legit.

User avatar
UVA2B
Posts: 2690
Joined: Sun May 22, 2016 10:48 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby UVA2B » Thu Apr 06, 2017 10:56 pm

runinthefront wrote:Stanford

https://www-cdn.law.stanford.edu/wp-con ... tats-1.pdf

Total grads: 183
Biglaw: 92 = 50.2%
Fed Clerkships: 45 = 24.5%

74.7% in BL/FC

(side note: Stanford does a great job detailing where its "JD Advantage"/PI graduates go. Kudos to them.)


Agreed, the greater transparency on opaque outcomes is welcomed. I think you might see (to a lesser degree) this holding true at most of the T13. It's probably not as rosy as you go down the list, but it's nice to see the quantifiable difference in non BL+Art. III outcomes at this tier with some possibility of extrapolation.

grades??
Posts: 984
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:55 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby grades?? » Thu Apr 06, 2017 10:57 pm

YDS confirmed.

User avatar
OneHandedEconomist
Posts: 263
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 12:29 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby OneHandedEconomist » Thu Apr 06, 2017 10:58 pm

grades?? wrote:YDS confirmed.


*DPV

grades??
Posts: 984
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:55 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby grades?? » Thu Apr 06, 2017 11:01 pm

OneHandedEconomist wrote:
grades?? wrote:YDS confirmed.


*DPV


Thats fine with me. Given that Yale usually has a lower BL+FC rate (because unicorn jobs), it is now at least likely if not almost guaranteed that Duke will have the highest combined number (if we assume UVA's data posted earlier is correct).

kingpin101
Posts: 319
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 5:24 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby kingpin101 » Thu Apr 06, 2017 11:04 pm

grades?? wrote:
OneHandedEconomist wrote:
grades?? wrote:YDS confirmed.


*DPV


Thats fine with me. Given that Yale usually has a lower BL+FC rate (because unicorn jobs), it is now at least likely if not almost guaranteed that Duke will have the highest combined number (if we assume UVA's data posted earlier is correct).

Uh no CLS and Chicago will very likely be higher.

User avatar
proteinshake
Posts: 4553
Joined: Tue Dec 08, 2015 12:20 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby proteinshake » Thu Apr 06, 2017 11:05 pm

grades?? wrote:
OneHandedEconomist wrote:
grades?? wrote:YDS confirmed.


*DPV


Thats fine with me. Given that Yale usually has a lower BL+FC rate (because unicorn jobs), it is now at least likely if not almost guaranteed that Duke will have the highest combined number (if we assume UVA's data posted earlier is correct).

I feel like Chicago will (they had 83% last year). but I agree with DPV.

User avatar
OneHandedEconomist
Posts: 263
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 12:29 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby OneHandedEconomist » Thu Apr 06, 2017 11:06 pm

kingpin101 wrote:
grades?? wrote:
OneHandedEconomist wrote:
grades?? wrote:YDS confirmed.


*DPV


Thats fine with me. Given that Yale usually has a lower BL+FC rate (because unicorn jobs), it is now at least likely if not almost guaranteed that Duke will have the highest combined number (if we assume UVA's data posted earlier is correct).

Uh no CLS and Chicago will very likely be higher.


Guessing CC goes to 80+ with N in the low 70s.

grades??
Posts: 984
Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2016 6:55 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby grades?? » Thu Apr 06, 2017 11:06 pm

proteinshake wrote:
grades?? wrote:
OneHandedEconomist wrote:
grades?? wrote:YDS confirmed.


*DPV


Thats fine with me. Given that Yale usually has a lower BL+FC rate (because unicorn jobs), it is now at least likely if not almost guaranteed that Duke will have the highest combined number (if we assume UVA's data posted earlier is correct).

I feel like Chicago will (they had 83% last year). but I agree with DPV.


Okay okay

CCDYHSPV is fine with me too

RedPurpleBlue
Posts: 432
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 9:41 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby RedPurpleBlue » Thu Apr 06, 2017 11:41 pm

OneHandedEconomist wrote:
kingpin101 wrote:
grades?? wrote:
OneHandedEconomist wrote:
grades?? wrote:YDS confirmed.


*DPV


Thats fine with me. Given that Yale usually has a lower BL+FC rate (because unicorn jobs), it is now at least likely if not almost guaranteed that Duke will have the highest combined number (if we assume UVA's data posted earlier is correct).

Uh no CLS and Chicago will very likely be higher.


Guessing CC goes to 80+ with N in the low 70s.


Can't see N getting much higher than mid low/mid 70s with ~10% of each class being JD-MBA.

User avatar
OneHandedEconomist
Posts: 263
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 12:29 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby OneHandedEconomist » Thu Apr 06, 2017 11:43 pm

RedPurpleBlue wrote:
OneHandedEconomist wrote:
kingpin101 wrote:
grades?? wrote:
OneHandedEconomist wrote:
grades?? wrote:YDS confirmed.


*DPV


Thats fine with me. Given that Yale usually has a lower BL+FC rate (because unicorn jobs), it is now at least likely if not almost guaranteed that Duke will have the highest combined number (if we assume UVA's data posted earlier is correct).

Uh no CLS and Chicago will very likely be higher.


Guessing CC goes to 80+ with N in the low 70s.


Can't see N getting much higher than mid low/mid 70s with ~10% of each class being JD-MBA.


Lol, also having a fucking class of 500.

ABA should cap enrollment at 300 for all schools.

kingpin101
Posts: 319
Joined: Tue Dec 20, 2011 5:24 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby kingpin101 » Thu Apr 06, 2017 11:44 pm

RedPurpleBlue wrote:
OneHandedEconomist wrote:
kingpin101 wrote:
grades?? wrote:
OneHandedEconomist wrote:
grades?? wrote:YDS confirmed.


*DPV


Thats fine with me. Given that Yale usually has a lower BL+FC rate (because unicorn jobs), it is now at least likely if not almost guaranteed that Duke will have the highest combined number (if we assume UVA's data posted earlier is correct).

Uh no CLS and Chicago will very likely be higher.


Guessing CC goes to 80+ with N in the low 70s.


Can't see N getting much higher than mid low/mid 70s with ~10% of each class being JD-MBA.

I see a confusion of N's going on here.

RedPurpleBlue
Posts: 432
Joined: Wed Dec 14, 2016 9:41 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby RedPurpleBlue » Fri Apr 07, 2017 12:45 am

kingpin101 wrote:
RedPurpleBlue wrote:
OneHandedEconomist wrote:
kingpin101 wrote:
grades?? wrote:
OneHandedEconomist wrote:
grades?? wrote:YDS confirmed.


*DPV


Thats fine with me. Given that Yale usually has a lower BL+FC rate (because unicorn jobs), it is now at least likely if not almost guaranteed that Duke will have the highest combined number (if we assume UVA's data posted earlier is correct).

Uh no CLS and Chicago will very likely be higher.


Guessing CC goes to 80+ with N in the low 70s.


Can't see N getting much higher than mid low/mid 70s with ~10% of each class being JD-MBA.

I see a confusion of N's going on here.


100%. I just had an "Oh" moment after reading the comment about a class of 500.

User avatar
jbagelboy
Posts: 10175
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby jbagelboy » Fri Apr 07, 2017 1:14 am

Whoa. Very strong showing so far for c/o 2016. UVA at 77%!

Npret
Posts: 1163
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2017 11:42 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby Npret » Fri Apr 07, 2017 1:51 am

Congrats everyone. This is getting to pre ITE levels. It's not primarily the schools it's the market. Schools can place when there are jobs. Looks like jobs are back. My old firm is over 100 SAs in NYC which is basically the old days level.

Great news considering govt public hiring may be way down again outside certain areas. That's just politics.

Edit: 0Ls don't get cocky though. You still have to get the job. School cant hand it to you. But it's so much better than the past.

User avatar
Dr. Nefario
Posts: 2680
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2014 3:07 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby Dr. Nefario » Fri Apr 07, 2017 7:26 am

BU's not *live* but messing around with the link got me the tentative info as of March 15.

https://www.bu.edu/law/careers/employme ... 6-testing/

2015 2016 Difference
Big Law. 70. 78. +8
Fed Clerk. 2. 2. --
Total Grads 208. 222. +14
Percentage. 34.6%. 36%. +1.5%

10% increase since Class of 2013.

ETA: went through and tried this for the rest of the t14 and several others, but didn't work.

thereelfeels
Posts: 52
Joined: Wed Mar 27, 2013 3:56 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby thereelfeels » Fri Apr 07, 2017 9:11 am

Dickinson - 3/34 - 8.8% (+5.3%)

User avatar
Rigo
Posts: 15803
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 3:19 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby Rigo » Fri Apr 07, 2017 9:16 am

thereelfeels wrote:Dickinson - 3/34 - 8.8% (+5.3%)

Are you doing this right? I get Dickinson has small class sizes but 34 seems abnormally small. You should divide by the total grads, not just the employed grads.

User avatar
tuesdayninja
Posts: 368
Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2016 9:37 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby tuesdayninja » Fri Apr 07, 2017 10:25 am

Dr. Nefario wrote:BU's not *live* but messing around with the link got me the tentative info as of March 15.

https://www.bu.edu/law/careers/employme ... 6-testing/

2015 2016 Difference
Big Law. 70. 78. +8
Fed Clerk. 2. 2. --
Total Grads 208. 222. +14
Percentage. 34.6%. 36%. +1.5%

10% increase since Class of 2013.

ETA: went through and tried this for the rest of the t14 and several others, but didn't work.


That link doesn't work, requires a login?

User avatar
OneHandedEconomist
Posts: 263
Joined: Tue Mar 28, 2017 12:29 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby OneHandedEconomist » Fri Apr 07, 2017 10:40 am

How should current 0L's interpret this data? Since there's about a year and a half until we go through OCI?

User avatar
Nebby
amateur huffpo
Posts: 29549
Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 12:23 pm

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby Nebby » Fri Apr 07, 2017 10:48 am

OneHandedEconomist wrote:How should current 0L's interpret this data? Since there's about a year and a half until we go through OCI?

You should use this data in deciding what schools provide the best shot at biglaw or clerkships. The only outlier of the general placement trend is CLS, which has a subpar clerkship office, but anyone with good grades and hustle can still land clerkships.

A single year's data isn't as important as trends. Once the data is out and I have free time I will post a chart that shows 3 year trends. That trend data is more important than a single year data point.

User avatar
runinthefront
Posts: 1797
Joined: Wed Jan 15, 2014 2:18 am

Re: Class of 2016 Employment Statistics by School

Postby runinthefront » Fri Apr 07, 2017 10:51 am

Nebby wrote:
OneHandedEconomist wrote:How should current 0L's interpret this data? Since there's about a year and a half until we go through OCI?

You should use this data in deciding what schools provide the best shot at biglaw or clerkships. The only outlier of the general placement trend is CLS, which has a subpar clerkship office, but anyone with good grades and hustle can still land clerkships.

A single year's data isn't as important as trends. Once the data is out and I have free time I will post a chart that shows 3 year trends. That trend data is more important than a single year data point.

lol Nebby

What makes you think the offices at Cornell/UPenn/NU aren't similarly "bad" and deflating the clerkship numbers? (or that Chicago's/Harvard's clerkship offices are operating/placing students at their full potential?) Weird, unfounded comment to make.




Return to “Choosing a Law School”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests