Dishydiana wrote:sfoglia wrote:
Ha, I love your name.
Was cost a question for you? $75k may not be a lot of money in the scheme of things, but it does cover my tuition for an entire year.
Thanks
I like it too
Cost was a big concern for me, and the offer from NYU was a bit higher ($120,000). Given my interests (PI/Gov/Fancy Clerking/Academics), my mechanism of loan repayment will be LIPP/LRAP regardless of whether I take out a debt of $120,000 or twice that much. The advantage of NYU, then, would be a smaller debt to claw my way out of should I end up hating (or crapping out with) PI/Gov/Fancy Clerking/Academics. I don't believe, though, that the debt at NYU would be small enough to offer me a quick and easy passage of escape from a career in the Law.
The choice, then, is Harvard or No Law School at All. And, for the time being, I've chosen Harvard. (I have all summer to second-guess and doubt my decision
It was tough to cross out NYC, though. I love that place so, so much. One day, I'll move back...
If you're going into a field where your expected salary would be above the cap of Harvard's LIPP, it may make sense to go to NYU, given your preferences. You also might want to think about how your salary will grow in the ten years beyond law school, as well as the salary of a spouse (should marrying a yuppie or baron be ur thing). Taking that $75,000 scholly would cut a few hundred off the top of your monthly repayment.
And if any TLS interlopers have a different take on my situation,
please chime in! I'm interested in a career in environmental regulation and policy. My NYU scholarship expires tonight.
For any other lurkers like me reading this thread, I'll just chime in to say that I have similar career goals and given a slighter lower but comparable NYU scholarship, I will be enrolling at NYU over Harvard. I think my environmental interests (with a particular interest in city-level planning, so NYU obviously has great strength here) will be well-served, that there's no edge that meaningful edge that Harvard would provide in terms of my preferred career interests (non-academic, non-federal, non-impact lit), and that personally I will be happier studying at NYU and living in the city.
Also, for the little it's worth and at risk of diverting the conversation, I would like to chime in to note the frequency with which I have already heard (as a 0L) stories of spousal assets rendering students/alums ineligible for LIPP/LRAP, and how this came as a very unwelcome surprise. Even if you're dead poor, if you marry someone living in a high COL area, it doesn't take a yuppie or baron (haha, to quote the previous poster
) to have purchased a home and have 200K in combined equity (edit: though mortgage liability is also usually included as debt), savings, investments, and retirement by the time they reach their early thirties. It takes a relatively lucrative but not insane salary, or an unexpected death of a grandparent leading to a partial house downpayment, etcetc, and smart financial planning. So say you're a KJD who gets married at 30 to such an individual, you would say have a minimum of 5 years of LIPP/LRAP left, and potentially be on the hook for 150K of still outstanding student loan debt. Obviously, if you're an older student, it becomes more and more likely that you could find a partner with LIPP-complicating assets before you finish the program. Now, you don't have to get married, but I don't like the way that the program can heavily disincentivize that life choice, and I think very few admits understand how possible this complication can be.
I have a partner who will likely render me LIPP/LRAP-ineligible if we get married, so obviously the scholarship (a 60-70K gap over a projection of Harvard's grant aid) became much more important when I realize that these and other loan repayment options could be problematic for my particular situation.