Retake/reapply or nah?

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )

Retake/reapply?

UCLA
9
69%
Retake/reapply
4
31%
 
Total votes: 13

User avatar
fishbulb
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 2:29 pm

Retake/reapply or nah?

Postby fishbulb » Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:46 pm

.
Last edited by fishbulb on Wed Jun 17, 2015 11:25 pm, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Hikikomorist
Posts: 3135
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:05 pm

Re: Retake/reapply or nah?

Postby Hikikomorist » Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:52 pm

Was UCLA's offer an anomaly, or did you outperform your numbers across the board?

User avatar
fishbulb
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 2:29 pm

Re: Retake/reapply or nah?

Postby fishbulb » Sat Jun 13, 2015 11:59 pm

.
Last edited by fishbulb on Thu Jun 25, 2015 6:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

PoopNpants
Posts: 856
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2014 9:40 pm

Re: Retake/reapply or nah?

Postby PoopNpants » Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:06 am

I think thats a great outcome with your numbers and considering your goals I'd take it. congrats

User avatar
Mack.Hambleton
Posts: 5417
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am

Re: Retake/reapply or nah?

Postby Mack.Hambleton » Sun Jun 14, 2015 4:51 am

How is your debt that low? 25k plus COL should be like 130k+ at repayment

User avatar
fishbulb
Posts: 63
Joined: Tue Aug 24, 2010 2:29 pm

Re: Retake/reapply or nah?

Postby fishbulb » Sun Jun 14, 2015 10:22 am

.
Last edited by fishbulb on Thu Jun 25, 2015 6:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Hikikomorist
Posts: 3135
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2014 12:05 pm

Re: Retake/reapply or nah?

Postby Hikikomorist » Sun Jun 14, 2015 10:28 am

Mack.Hambleton wrote:How is your debt that low? 25k plus COL should be like 130k+ at repayment

You know that was the total tuition for all three years, right?

User avatar
BasilHallward
Posts: 424
Joined: Fri Jan 23, 2015 1:19 pm

Re: Retake/reapply or nah?

Postby BasilHallward » Sun Jun 14, 2015 11:37 am

Is there any reason for us to think that you won't 'lazily prep' for you third attempt?? If you want to take the LSAT seriously, then yes, retake. If not, then 166 is fine.
Last edited by BasilHallward on Mon Jun 15, 2015 4:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
chuckbass
Posts: 9957
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2011 9:29 pm

Re: Retake/reapply or nah?

Postby chuckbass » Sun Jun 14, 2015 11:43 am

Definitely not a bad option, but I would retake for the better shot at biglaw personally since you don't sound like you'd actually be happy doing PI.

User avatar
A. Nony Mouse
Posts: 22870
Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am

Re: Retake/reapply or nah?

Postby A. Nony Mouse » Sun Jun 14, 2015 12:18 pm

BasilHallward wrote:
fishbulb wrote:Don't quote please.

Is there any reason for us to think that you won't 'lazily prep' for you third attempt?? If you want to take the LSAT seriously, then yes, retake. If not, then 166 is fine.

The OP did ask you not to quote...

User avatar
Mack.Hambleton
Posts: 5417
Joined: Mon Jan 13, 2014 2:09 am

Re: Retake/reapply or nah?

Postby Mack.Hambleton » Sun Jun 14, 2015 5:03 pm

Hikkomorist wrote:
Mack.Hambleton wrote:How is your debt that low? 25k plus COL should be like 130k+ at repayment

You know that was the total tuition for all three years, right?


Oh ok




Return to “Choosing a Law School”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 3 guests