If she wants to work in Indiana, Indiana is better.Nova wrote:Id like to hear some reasoning from whoever picked Indiana in the poll
If she doesn't know where she wants to work, Indiana is also better.
If she wants to work in Indiana, Indiana is better.Nova wrote:Id like to hear some reasoning from whoever picked Indiana in the poll
I don't think that's true. There are plenty of people who didn't decide where they were going to work until 3L year or even after graduation who have ended up just fine.rad lulz wrote:If she doesn't know where she wants to work, she needs to pick a place
there are also people who went to Cooley who have ended up just finesuperflush wrote:I don't think that's true. There are plenty of people who didn't decide where they were going to work until 3L year or even after graduation who have ended up just fine.rad lulz wrote:If she doesn't know where she wants to work, she needs to pick a place
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
IU has 22.1% under-employment on LST, Tenn has 20%. I'd say they are fairly similar. I'm fine with including people who have full-time industry jobs.cron1834 wrote:IUB has a 53% employment score from LST. That is genuinely bad. Any "bonus" for "portability" needs to be heavily discounted.
I'm saying that they are in the same league, and the difference is quite small. IU has higher salaries and much wider alumni network, etc. as well.cron1834 wrote:You're missing the point. IUB is worse on both measures, and is "not good" on any employment measure. Yet, you seem sanguine about it ITT.
We can agree on this. I'm not going to address the rest - you just seem to be spouting a lot of boomerism ITT.superflush wrote: I'm saying that they are in the same league, and the difference is quite small.
Yep.cron1834 wrote:We can agree on this. I'm not going to address the rest - you just seem to be spouting a lot of boomerism ITT.superflush wrote: I'm saying that they are in the same league, and the difference is quite small.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Agree with this. I considered UTK. Good school. I appreciated their honesty. They charge the vast majority of their students the same tuition, which also happens to be a fair price. Also met a lot of fine people down there.deadpanic wrote:IU is more like a Minnesota or Alabama that plays the rankings game to get a meaningless 20-something ranking, so they throw out a ton of cash to either high GPA or high LSAT candidates. UT is like a lot of other state schools and doesn't dish out a ton of $$, especially to people already in-state.kyle010723 wrote:What I am really baffled with about this thread is why is IUB giving you 20,000/yr while TN is not going you a dime, that does not make sense to me. If you got into IUB with $$, presumably your credential is above median if not near the top for TN. I don't know anything about TN, just curious is all.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
That's certainly positive news. Congrats. Do you have any desire to practice in Tennessee over Indiana, or vice versa?kellohitty wrote:Update: I just found out that I will also be receiving a 5k/yr scholarship from UT along with instate tuition, making tuition+fees come out to 14k a yr and 45k cheaper than IUB. My decision may have gotten even easier to make.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login