I'm no lawyer or student yet, but that seems like that's a pretty good situation to be in!tjsmms061906 wrote:W&L with full tuition (GI Bill) and $25K/yr no stips
ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad Forum
- Attax
- Posts: 3589
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am
Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad
- Dr. Review
- Posts: 1800
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:51 am
Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad
Full tuition with possible recode sounds worth it, but I'd make sure I have VA/NC ties (more VA than NC). Wouldn't go for less than 80% scholarship.tjsmms061906 wrote:W&L with full tuition (GI Bill) and $25K/yr no stips (I will try to recode so I can apply it to cost of living)
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad
Probably would go for about $75k-$100k debt, somewhere in thereJohn Everyman wrote:BU or BC
Edit: Also curious about ND
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad
Wouldn't do itlawpanther wrote:Does it have to be our top choice or just a school we're considering?
My vote would be for UC Irvine.
thanks!
I don't know when they're gonna exhaust their goodwill but it's too much of an unknown
- catsinboxes
- Posts: 19
- Joined: Fri Jan 10, 2014 4:03 pm
Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad
George Mason, part time w/ $8,000 a year (will try to negotiate more). I work full time (no cost of living loans) as a paralegal in DC in a niche area, have ties to both government and private companies. Employer may pay some tuition, and I can pay part part of it each semester. Yay?Nay?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- worldtraveler
- Posts: 8676
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:47 am
Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad
Checking in as practicing attorney.
- Dr. Review
- Posts: 1800
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:51 am
Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad
Probably only if you are staying at your current firm as an attorney after graduation. There's a long list of DC area/VA schools, and George Mason is not near the top of it in hiring.catsinboxes wrote:George Mason, part time w/ $8,000 a year (will try to negotiate more). I work full time (no cost of living loans) as a paralegal in DC in a niche area, have ties to both government and private companies. Employer may pay some tuition, and I can pay part part of it each semester. Yay?Nay?
- Dr. Review
- Posts: 1800
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:51 am
Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad
I'd do SMU @ 50% with proper ties. 90k is within reasonAustinbound wrote:SMU @ 90k
- worldtraveler
- Posts: 8676
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2007 4:47 am
Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad
Wouldn't do it.catsinboxes wrote:George Mason, part time w/ $8,000 a year (will try to negotiate more). I work full time (no cost of living loans) as a paralegal in DC in a niche area, have ties to both government and private companies. Employer may pay some tuition, and I can pay part part of it each semester. Yay?Nay?
- Dr. Review
- Posts: 1800
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:51 am
Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad
Other practitioners:
Thoughts on ND? I am on the fence between "only for free" and "greater than half is OK".
Thoughts on ND? I am on the fence between "only for free" and "greater than half is OK".
- bound
- Posts: 1083
- Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:49 pm
Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad
Bedsole wrote:I'd do SMU @ 50% with proper ties. 90k is within reasonAustinbound wrote:SMU @ 90k
Cool thanks. Tuition would come out to ~54K for the three years so I didn't know if people would argue that that was too high.
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad
km
Last edited by rad lulz on Thu Sep 08, 2016 11:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 2777
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:19 pm
Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad
Greater than half is ok, but it really depends on what your goals are.Bedsole wrote:Other practitioners:
Thoughts on ND? I am on the fence between "only for free" and "greater than half is OK".
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Dr. Review
- Posts: 1800
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:51 am
Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad
I'm leaning towards "not for any cost"rad lulz wrote:Sameworldtraveler wrote:Wouldn't do it.catsinboxes wrote:George Mason, part time w/ $8,000 a year (will try to negotiate more). I work full time (no cost of living loans) as a paralegal in DC in a niche area, have ties to both government and private companies. Employer may pay some tuition, and I can pay part part of it each semester. Yay?Nay?
Job outlook sucks
Agree/disagree?
-
- Posts: 2777
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:19 pm
Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad
It's really vital to post what you want to do and if you have ties. NYLS for free to work NYC biglaw isn't worth it. NYLS for free to work at Dad's Law Firm (and Dad's rich enough to give you enough to party it up in MFH while you're in law school) is probably not a bad deal, since literally all you need is a piece of paper to sit for the bar.
-
- Posts: 2777
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:19 pm
Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad
This seems like a good deal.tjsmms061906 wrote:W&L with full tuition (GI Bill) and $25K/yr no stips (I will try to recode so I can apply it to cost of living)
- Dr. Review
- Posts: 1800
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:51 am
Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad
OP updated to request info about ties/scholarship/goals.timbs4339 wrote:It's really vital to post what you want to do and if you have ties. NYLS for free to work NYC biglaw isn't worth it. NYLS for free to work at Dad's Law Firm (and Dad's rich enough to give you enough to party it up in MFH while you're in law school) is probably not a bad deal, since literally all you need is a piece of paper to sit for the bar.
Edit: practitioners, listing your alma mater and what scholly level you'd attend might help.
Pitt: I had a good outcome, but if I had it to re-do, I'd only go for free/close to free.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- Attax
- Posts: 3589
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am
Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad
Updating for info:
Goals: Biglawl
Ties: Texas at some big firms, only two big firms connections with hiring individuals
UG Location: Texas
Desire to practice: Don't care, but Texas seems like the place to be given connections.
Texas with tuition exemption (no stip)
Washington & Lee with 35k/year (no stip)
WUStL with no schollie info yet
Baylor with full ride + stipend (2.7 stip)
Goals: Biglawl
Ties: Texas at some big firms, only two big firms connections with hiring individuals
UG Location: Texas
Desire to practice: Don't care, but Texas seems like the place to be given connections.
Texas with tuition exemption (no stip)
Washington & Lee with 35k/year (no stip)
WUStL with no schollie info yet
Baylor with full ride + stipend (2.7 stip)
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad
Texas isn't a bad idea but biglaw is unlikelyAttax wrote:Updating for info:
Goals: Biglawl
Ties: Texas at some big firms, only two big firms connections with hiring individuals
UG Location: Texas
Desire to practice: Don't care, but Texas seems like the place to be given connections.
Texas with tuition exemption (no stip)
Washington & Lee with 35k/year (no stip)
WUStL with no schollie info yet
Baylor with full ride + stipend (2.7 stip)
- Dr. Review
- Posts: 1800
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:51 am
Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad
W&L seems like a rando on that list with ties to TX. Wouldn't do W&L for that price.rad lulz wrote:Texas isn't a bad idea but biglaw is unlikelyAttax wrote:Updating for info:
Goals: Biglawl
Ties: Texas at some big firms, only two big firms connections with hiring individuals
UG Location: Texas
Desire to practice: Don't care, but Texas seems like the place to be given connections.
Texas with tuition exemption (no stip)
Washington & Lee with 35k/year (no stip)
WUStL with no schollie info yet
Baylor with full ride + stipend (2.7 stip)
- yossarian
- Posts: 1303
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad
1) Thanks everyone. Really appreciate the advice from the practitioners.Bedsole wrote:OP updated to request info about ties/scholarship/goals.timbs4339 wrote:It's really vital to post what you want to do and if you have ties. NYLS for free to work NYC biglaw isn't worth it. NYLS for free to work at Dad's Law Firm (and Dad's rich enough to give you enough to party it up in MFH while you're in law school) is probably not a bad deal, since literally all you need is a piece of paper to sit for the bar.
Edit: practitioners, listing your alma mater and what scholly level you'd attend might help.
Pitt: I had a good outcome, but if I had it to re-do, I'd only go for free/close to free.
2) I understand that to some degree, no advice can be given without goals, but if the purpose of this thread is the list in the OP, doesn't a more generalized goal need to be assumed. Just, gainful employment to pay off debt (at whatever level the school gets classified into)? Again, perhaps if this is assumed, the list has no value anyway, but it is, after all, a generalized list of tiered classification.
3) Curious as to the thoughts between listing BU/BC firmly in the 50% category but ND closer to 75%. Both are saturated markets (East Coast Metros and CHI), and both seem to function similarly in their regions (from what I can tell). Thoughts on this?
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Attax
- Posts: 3589
- Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am
Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad
Yeah, they are mostly in it for scholarship negotiations, but as of now is the best official offer I have from a school.Bedsole wrote:W&L seems like a rando on that list with ties to TX. Wouldn't do W&L for that price.rad lulz wrote:Texas isn't a bad idea but biglaw is unlikelyAttax wrote:Updating for info:
Goals: Biglawl
Ties: Texas at some big firms, only two big firms connections with hiring individuals
UG Location: Texas
Desire to practice: Don't care, but Texas seems like the place to be given connections.
Texas with tuition exemption (no stip)
Washington & Lee with 35k/year (no stip)
WUStL with no schollie info yet
Baylor with full ride + stipend (2.7 stip)
- Dr. Review
- Posts: 1800
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:51 am
Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad
personally, I think BU/BC might best fall into the "for free" zone, but rad expressed his opinion of ~50% as being OK. These kinds of lists are good starting points, not bibles to follow for all purposes.yossarian71 wrote:3) Curious as to the thoughts between listing BU/BC firmly in the 50% category but ND closer to 75%. Both are saturated markets (East Coast Metros and CHI), and both seem to function similarly in their regions (from what I can tell). Thoughts on this?
That said, I wouldn't attend either for less than half, and I'd prefer closer to 2/3 or 3/4 scholly for both.
- yossarian
- Posts: 1303
- Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 2:45 pm
Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad
UPDATED POST WITH GOALS
Goal: Biglaw
Region: Indianapolis
Connections: Lifer, no strong ties to law firms, but loose relationships with a few partners (an email or coffee once/twice per year kinda thing)
Schools:
ND w/ $ (no word yet on amount, let's assume 50%)
WUSTL (no scholly info yet, let's assume 50%)
IU-B (in state plus 50%)
Goal: Biglaw
Region: Indianapolis
Connections: Lifer, no strong ties to law firms, but loose relationships with a few partners (an email or coffee once/twice per year kinda thing)
Schools:
ND w/ $ (no word yet on amount, let's assume 50%)
WUSTL (no scholly info yet, let's assume 50%)
IU-B (in state plus 50%)
- Dr. Review
- Posts: 1800
- Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:51 am
Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad
OP list is to keep people from rehashing the same schools. Individual responses cover the goals listed in the request.yossarian71 wrote: 2) I understand that to some degree, no advice can be given without goals, but if the purpose of this thread is the list in the OP, doesn't a more generalized goal need to be assumed. Just, gainful employment to pay off debt (at whatever level the school gets classified into)? Again, perhaps if this is assumed, the list has no value anyway, but it is, after all, a generalized list of tiered classification.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login