ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
User avatar
Dr. Review
Posts: 1797
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:51 am

ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

Postby Dr. Review » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:02 pm

UPDATE: Please post your goals for attending law school (i.e. PI/biglaw) and any potential scholarships/ties

Preferred format:
Goal(s): Biglaw, PI, etc.
Regional Ties: Any ties that are substantial enough to sell in an interview, especially if they show up on your resume
School(s): Name of school and total cost to attend (NOT the total scholarship award) after scholarships and cost of living
Other pertinent information: Undergrad loans, GI bill, spouse who covers COA, etc.


I thought we might be able to condense some of the chatter about why you shouldn't attend most schools outside the T14 without a substantial scholarship, especially if it isn't a state flagship that places well in a market that is not oversaturated.

I know that a number of practicing attorneys, such as reasonable man, rad lulz, me, etc. are raring for chances to break down why your top choice is bad, backed with loads of stats as well as anecdotal data. So tell us any school that you are seriously considering outside the T14, and we'll tell you why it's bad. I'll try to keep a running tally of bad schools, and if this takes off, I'll include links to the start of a discussion about why that school is a profit mongering degree mill.

Just to keep the advice as practical as possible, please limit advice posts to post-grads (although jobless 3Ls may have some input).


Practicing attorneys ready to pounce:
Dr. Review
timbs4339
rad lulz
worldtraveler
bikeflip
prezidentv8
reasonable_man
beach_terror
presh
romothesavior

Do not go under any circumstances
UMaine
Cincinnati
UC Irvine (employment numbers are good, but there are too many unknowns, and the bottom could fall out at any time)
St. Johns
Cardozo
NYLS
Brooklyn
Quinnipiac
DePaul
American
Catholic
Hastings
Santa Clara

Might be worth it for free/near free (assuming you have ties or the region doesn't require ties)
Fordham
W&M
Chicago-Kent (borderline with don't go; market is really saturated, Kent is low on the totem pole)
W&L
Pitt
George Mason
IU-B
Emory (COL alone is enough to incur $75k debt, less than 70% tuition isn't worth it)
UCLA
USC

Reasonable alternative for half or better scholarship
Vandy
BC/BU ($75k-$100k total cost; >50% scholly)
UNC(in-state or half)/Wake
SMU
ND (50% is borderline, maybe more like 75% scholly)
WUSTL

Might be worth it at sticker (lol)


Jury still out (discussion ongoing):



Bikeflip wrote:Also, if we're adding useful stuff to the OP, add this: A loan repayment calculator

Maybe this, too: Zillow's real estate market In other words, what does a mortgage payment look like when compared to a student loan payment?


Paul Campos wrote:I've made this suggestion a couple of times before and will make it again, as it seems especially germane to this excellent conversation:

Discussions of this type need to take into account as explicitly as possible the likely opportunity cost which will be incurred by the prospective law student. I get emails on a regular basis from people who are making $60K or more in stable jobs featuring good benefits, who are thinking about going to law school. Such people are in a radically different position than people with non-marketable undergrad degrees, working ten dollar an hour retail jobs with no benefits and zero job security.

This is an obvious point, but it's not one of the pieces of information people are asked to provide by the message stickied at the top of the forum.
Last edited by Dr. Review on Tue Dec 02, 2014 2:58 pm, edited 51 times in total.

lawpanther
Posts: 17
Joined: Sat Oct 19, 2013 1:42 pm

Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

Postby lawpanther » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:04 pm

Does it have to be our top choice or just a school we're considering?

My vote would be for UC Irvine.

thanks!

User avatar
Dr. Review
Posts: 1797
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:51 am

Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

Postby Dr. Review » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:07 pm

lawpanther wrote:Does it have to be our top choice or just a school we're considering?

My vote would be for UC Irvine.

thanks!


OP edited to allow schools that aren't top choices. Will let this post go to someone else for now, don't want to hog the thread.

timbs4339
Posts: 2733
Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:19 pm

Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

Postby timbs4339 » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:07 pm

Checking in as a practicing attorney, ready to pounce.

User avatar
TheSpanishMain
Posts: 4114
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:26 pm

Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

Postby TheSpanishMain » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:08 pm

William and Mary.

UNC.

User avatar
yossarian
Posts: 1303
Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 2:45 pm

Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

Postby yossarian » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:12 pm

ND

WUSTL

IUB (for Indy only)

Giddy-Up
Posts: 103
Joined: Sun Apr 20, 2008 8:36 am

Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

Postby Giddy-Up » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:13 pm

Chicago-Kent, full scholarship, part time.

User avatar
John Everyman
Posts: 517
Joined: Wed Dec 11, 2013 2:20 pm

Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

Postby John Everyman » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:14 pm

BU or BC

Edit: Also curious about ND

User avatar
bound
Posts: 1083
Joined: Wed Oct 23, 2013 4:49 pm

Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

Postby bound » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:22 pm

SMU @ 90k

rad lulz
Posts: 9844
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

Postby rad lulz » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:23 pm

timbs4339 wrote:Checking in as a practicing attorney, ready to pounce.

User avatar
Synch
Posts: 166
Joined: Tue Jan 21, 2014 11:33 pm

Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

Postby Synch » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:25 pm

Fordham, half scholly

rad lulz
Posts: 9844
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

Postby rad lulz » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:25 pm

m
Last edited by rad lulz on Thu Sep 08, 2016 11:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

rad lulz
Posts: 9844
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

Postby rad lulz » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:26 pm

m
Last edited by rad lulz on Thu Sep 08, 2016 11:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
jk148706
Posts: 2499
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 11:14 am

Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

Postby jk148706 » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:28 pm

Vandy

User avatar
Dr. Review
Posts: 1797
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:51 am

Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

Postby Dr. Review » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:28 pm

Going forward, let's try to categorize schools under one the following categories:

-Do not go under any circumstances
-Might be worth it for free (assuming you have ties or the region doesn't require ties)
-Reasonable alternative for half or better scholarship
-Might be worth it at sticker (lol)

Feel free to amend categories if they don't make sense.

rad lulz
Posts: 9844
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

Postby rad lulz » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:30 pm

m
Last edited by rad lulz on Thu Sep 08, 2016 11:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
jk148706
Posts: 2499
Joined: Fri May 10, 2013 11:14 am

Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

Postby jk148706 » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:30 pm

Cincinnati 1/3 scholarship

rad lulz
Posts: 9844
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

Postby rad lulz » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:31 pm

jk148706 wrote:Vandy

If you're a vanilla applicant (K-JD, no significant contact in legal industry, etc.) don't take out more than about 100k in loans

rad lulz
Posts: 9844
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

Postby rad lulz » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:32 pm

m
Last edited by rad lulz on Thu Sep 08, 2016 11:31 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Attax
Posts: 3589
Joined: Fri Oct 04, 2013 10:59 am

Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

Postby Attax » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:33 pm

Texas with tuition exemption
Washington & Lee with 35k/year
WUStL with no schollie info yet
Baylor with full ride + stipend

User avatar
Dr. Review
Posts: 1797
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:51 am

Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

Postby Dr. Review » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:34 pm

TheSpanishMain wrote:UNC.


I'd take UNC at in-state or half scholarship (same for Wake w/o in-state)
I doubt I would attend either without strong ties to NC
Last edited by Dr. Review on Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:38 pm, edited 1 time in total.

rad lulz
Posts: 9844
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

Postby rad lulz » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:35 pm

I'd take out maybe about $75k in loans for most state flagships including wake/unc

User avatar
TheSpanishMain
Posts: 4114
Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:26 pm

Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

Postby TheSpanishMain » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:39 pm

Bedsole wrote:
TheSpanishMain wrote:UNC.


I'd take UNC at in-state or half scholarship (same for Wake w/o in-state)
I doubt I would attend either without strong ties to NC


What about W&M? (Either would be free/nearly free due to Post 9/11 GI bill)

User avatar
Dr. Review
Posts: 1797
Joined: Sat Jan 30, 2010 1:51 am

Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

Postby Dr. Review » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:41 pm

TheSpanishMain wrote:
Bedsole wrote:
TheSpanishMain wrote:UNC.


I'd take UNC at in-state or half scholarship (same for Wake w/o in-state)
I doubt I would attend either without strong ties to NC


What about W&M? (Either would be free/nearly free due to Post 9/11 GI bill)


I'd do W&M for near free with ties to VA. UNC for near free with strong ties to NC is a go also. Both markets are tough to crack for outsiders, and both are saturated.
All things being equal between the two though, UNC is the better choice. Most common law degree in NC midlaw/biglaw by far.

User avatar
tjsmms061906
Posts: 70
Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 8:28 pm

Re: ITT: Practicing attorneys tell you your top choice is bad

Postby tjsmms061906 » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:51 pm

W&L with full tuition (GI Bill) and $25K/yr no stips (I will try to recode so I can apply it to cost of living)
Last edited by tjsmms061906 on Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:52 pm, edited 1 time in total.




Return to “Choosing a Law School”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 4 guests