nebula666 wrote:Not Harvard, Yale, or Stanford. Albany.john1990 wrote:john1990 wrote:What is the incentive for students to care about grades then. Why don't they just aim for 20th percentile and spend all there time at work and networking. Sounds like the 80th percentile for networking does well and that sounds easier than the 80th percentile for gradesstillwater wrote:^ lolwut?
Grades are very important for employment prospects, however, networking is important too. This is the same at higher law schools
You cannot believe that there is a law school or college of any kind where grades are not important. I would call you a troll but its fuckobvious
Albany v. St.johns Forum
- john1990
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:49 pm
Re: Albany v. St.johns
-
- Posts: 778
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 12:19 pm
Re: Albany v. St.johns
[/quote]john1990 wrote:Not Harvard, Yale, or Stanford. Albany.
How is TJSL?
- john1990
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:49 pm
Re: Albany v. St.johns
How is TJSL?[/quote]nebula666 wrote:john1990 wrote:Not Harvard, Yale, or Stanford. Albany.
Good. Grades are very important. Top third does well and there is little competition and no debt
-
- Posts: 239
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 6:41 pm
Re: Albany v. St.johns
Good. Grades are very important. Top third does well and there is little competition and no debt[/quote]john1990 wrote:How is TJSL?nebula666 wrote:john1990 wrote:Not Harvard, Yale, or Stanford. Albany.
Glad to hear TJSL is going well. How about your simultaneous apps to BU, GW, and Fordham?
- john1990
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:49 pm
Re: Albany v. St.johns
Glad to hear TJSL is going well. How about your simultaneous apps to BU, GW, and Fordham?[/quote]Jay2716 wrote:Good. Grades are very important. Top third does well and there is little competition and no debtjohn1990 wrote:How is TJSL?nebula666 wrote:john1990 wrote:Not Harvard, Yale, or Stanford. Albany.
Suck my dick for editing my post?
Last edited by john1990 on Sun Dec 29, 2013 6:22 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- rickgrimes69
- Posts: 1105
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 8:56 am
Re: Albany v. St.johns
All of my leljohn1990 wrote:No response. However, the employment statistics are hardly better at these schoolsJay2716 wrote: Glad to hear TJSL is going well. How about your simultaneous apps to BU, GW, and Fordham?
You just became my new favorite poaster
- john1990
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:49 pm
Re: Albany v. St.johns
You look like youd burn funny.rickgrimes69 wrote:All of my leljohn1990 wrote:No response. However, the employment statistics are hardly better at these schoolsJay2716 wrote: Glad to hear TJSL is going well. How about your simultaneous apps to BU, GW, and Fordham?
You just became my new favorite poaster
Whats 35% employment to 65% when the lsat jumps from 40th to 90th.
- Nova
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Re: Albany v. St.johns
Stop.john1990 wrote:
You look like youd burn funny.
Whats 35% employment to 65% when the lsat jumps from 40th to 90th.
- john1990
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:49 pm
Re: Albany v. St.johns
Sassy fontNova wrote:Stop.john1990 wrote:
You look like youd burn funny.
Whats 35% employment to 65% when the lsat jumps from 40th to 90th.
- stillwater
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm
Re: Albany v. St.johns
john1990 cracks me up. either epic flame or densest dood on the interwebz
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Albany v. St.johns
Sure [well, depending on your definition of "does well" and "top third" and "little competition," but putting that aside for now], but if you're not in the top 1/3, does it really matter whether you're ranked in the top half or the top 3/4? Someone ranked in the top 50% is not going to have a better shot at jobs based on grades than someone ranked in the top 75% - any advantage they have in getting a job will be based on networking, connections, experience. So it's not that grades are unimportant for all students at the school, it's that when you get outside that tiny sliver of people at the top, it doesn't really matter whether you're in the top 40% or top 60% - law firms won't hire a top 40% person over a top 60% person, they just won't hire either of them. (And no, there isn't a lot of incentive for those students to care about grades, and if they do, they're probably putting their energy toward the wrong things.)john1990 wrote:Good. Grades are very important. Top third does well and there is little competition and no debt
-
- Posts: 778
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 12:19 pm
Re: Albany v. St.johns
I tend to think he's actually delusional and not a troll but you never know. Entertaining either way I suppose.stillwater wrote:john1990 cracks me up. either epic flame or densest dood on the interwebz
- john1990
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:49 pm
Re: Albany v. St.johns
Top quartile is doing very well for employment and employers commonly say you must have a given GPA to apply. Median has a chance but that is when networking comes into play. Most employers aren't interested if you didn't break median. However there is very little competitionA. Nony Mouse wrote:Sure [well, depending on your definition of "does well" and "top third" and "little competition," but putting that aside for now], but if you're not in the top 1/3, does it really matter whether you're ranked in the top half or the top 3/4? Someone ranked in the top 50% is not going to have a better shot at jobs based on grades than someone ranked in the top 75% - any advantage they have in getting a job will be based on networking, connections, experience. So it's not that grades are unimportant for all students at the school, it's that when you get outside that tiny sliver of people at the top, it doesn't really matter whether you're in the top 40% or top 60% - law firms won't hire a top 40% person over a top 60% person, they just won't hire either of them. (And no, there isn't a lot of incentive for those students to care about grades, and if they do, they're probably putting their energy toward the wrong things.)john1990 wrote:Good. Grades are very important. Top third does well and there is little competition and no debt
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- john1990
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:49 pm
Re: Albany v. St.johns
I tend to think your all just flaming and like to piss people offnebula666 wrote:I tend to think he's actually delusional and not a troll but you never know. Entertaining either way I suppose.stillwater wrote:john1990 cracks me up. either epic flame or densest dood on the interwebz
- A. Nony Mouse
- Posts: 29293
- Joined: Tue Sep 25, 2012 11:51 am
Re: Albany v. St.johns
What do you mean, there's very little competition? There's always competition for legal jobs. There are more law grads than jobs, and there are a ton of law schools in New York (both NYC and the state).john1990 wrote:Top quartile is doing very well for employment and employers commonly say you must have a given GPA to apply. Median has a chance but that is when networking comes into play. Most employers aren't interested if you didn't break median. However there is very little competitionA. Nony Mouse wrote:Sure [well, depending on your definition of "does well" and "top third" and "little competition," but putting that aside for now], but if you're not in the top 1/3, does it really matter whether you're ranked in the top half or the top 3/4? Someone ranked in the top 50% is not going to have a better shot at jobs based on grades than someone ranked in the top 75% - any advantage they have in getting a job will be based on networking, connections, experience. So it's not that grades are unimportant for all students at the school, it's that when you get outside that tiny sliver of people at the top, it doesn't really matter whether you're in the top 40% or top 60% - law firms won't hire a top 40% person over a top 60% person, they just won't hire either of them. (And no, there isn't a lot of incentive for those students to care about grades, and if they do, they're probably putting their energy toward the wrong things.)john1990 wrote:Good. Grades are very important. Top third does well and there is little competition and no debt
-
- Posts: 778
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 12:19 pm
Re: Albany v. St.johns
Purposeful poor grammar. Leaning towards troll.john1990 wrote:I tend to think your all just flaming and like to piss people offnebula666 wrote:I tend to think he's actually delusional and not a troll but you never know. Entertaining either way I suppose.stillwater wrote:john1990 cracks me up. either epic flame or densest dood on the interwebz
- john1990
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:49 pm
Re: Albany v. St.johns
There are few gunners and a lot of the class is of a lesser caliber. It is easy to do well in class as a result.A. Nony Mouse wrote:What do you mean, there's very little competition? There's always competition for legal jobs. There are more law grads than jobs, and there are a ton of law schools in New York (both NYC and the state).john1990 wrote:Top quartile is doing very well for employment and employers commonly say you must have a given GPA to apply. Median has a chance but that is when networking comes into play. Most employers aren't interested if you didn't break median. However there is very little competitionA. Nony Mouse wrote:Sure [well, depending on your definition of "does well" and "top third" and "little competition," but putting that aside for now], but if you're not in the top 1/3, does it really matter whether you're ranked in the top half or the top 3/4? Someone ranked in the top 50% is not going to have a better shot at jobs based on grades than someone ranked in the top 75% - any advantage they have in getting a job will be based on networking, connections, experience. So it's not that grades are unimportant for all students at the school, it's that when you get outside that tiny sliver of people at the top, it doesn't really matter whether you're in the top 40% or top 60% - law firms won't hire a top 40% person over a top 60% person, they just won't hire either of them. (And no, there isn't a lot of incentive for those students to care about grades, and if they do, they're probably putting their energy toward the wrong things.)john1990 wrote:Good. Grades are very important. Top third does well and there is little competition and no debt
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- john1990
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:49 pm
Re: Albany v. St.johns
Make a thread to really figure this one out. It deserves its own threadnebula666 wrote:Purposeful poor grammar. Leaning towards troll.john1990 wrote:I tend to think your all just flaming and like to piss people offnebula666 wrote:I tend to think he's actually delusional and not a troll but you never know. Entertaining either way I suppose.stillwater wrote:john1990 cracks me up. either epic flame or densest dood on the interwebz
- stillwater
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm
Re: Albany v. St.johns
...except you are one of the doodz that is "of a lesser caliber" because you are there in the first place.john1990 wrote:
There are few gunners and a lot of the class is of a lesser caliber. It is easy to do well in class as a result.
- john1990
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:49 pm
Re: Albany v. St.johns
No it was a safety for mestillwater wrote:...except you are one of the doodz that is "of a lesser caliber" because you are there in the first place.john1990 wrote:
There are few gunners and a lot of the class is of a lesser caliber. It is easy to do well in class as a result.
- stillwater
- Posts: 3804
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 2:59 pm
Re: Albany v. St.johns
believe me, if you went to TJSL, the glove fitsjohn1990 wrote:No it was a safety for mestillwater wrote:...except you are one of the doodz that is "of a lesser caliber" because you are there in the first place.john1990 wrote:
There are few gunners and a lot of the class is of a lesser caliber. It is easy to do well in class as a result.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- john1990
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:49 pm
Re: Albany v. BU
I also went to Emory and I have numbers to go to BU. But I'm worried about doing poorly in classstillwater wrote:believe me, if you went to TJSL, the glove fitsjohn1990 wrote:No it was a safety for mestillwater wrote:...except you are one of the doodz that is "of a lesser caliber" because you are there in the first place.john1990 wrote:
There are few gunners and a lot of the class is of a lesser caliber. It is easy to do well in class as a result.
- john1990
- Posts: 1216
- Joined: Sun Jun 05, 2011 5:49 pm
Re: Albany v. St.johns
stillwater wrote:the glove fits.
No your reasoning is flawed. I am judging the percentiles. Do not believe that the 99% and the 50% are alike
-
- Posts: 9180
- Joined: Wed Dec 21, 2011 3:14 am
Re: Albany v. St.johns
Just so I can understand the situation better: you had the numbers for BU and chose TJLS instead? Or you believe you'll have the numbers to transfer to BU?
And are you saying part of your rationale for going to TJLS was having less competition?
Just trying to get a picture, as I haven't been following your posts.
And are you saying part of your rationale for going to TJLS was having less competition?
Just trying to get a picture, as I haven't been following your posts.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login