Do the HUSL.Strongfaithgirl wrote:Hey guys Loyola is ranked higher but not attractive for big law whereas I hear that Howard is. Which school would you choose? why? Better big law opportunities in Chicago or dc?
Howard law v. Loyola University Chicago Forum
- redcrosse
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2013 11:59 pm
Re: Howard law v. Loyola University Chicago
-
- Posts: 3070
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 12:17 am
Re: Howard law v. Loyola University Chicago
.
Last edited by 20141023 on Sun Feb 15, 2015 9:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 4:29 pm
Re: Howard law v. Loyola University Chicago
Medium level firmTheSpanishMain wrote:True, but you implied you wanted Big Law. Getting Big Law is VASTLY more difficult outside of the T14, particularly that far outside of it. If we were talking about a Vanderbilt or a Texas or an Emory, that might be okay at the right price. Loyola or Howard? No.Strongfaithgirl wrote:T14 is NOT the end all be all
You either need to A) accept that you won't get Big Law from either of these schools, and revise your goals. or B) Retake the LSAT.
Last edited by Strongfaithgirl on Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Thu Dec 12, 2013 4:29 pm
- TheSpanishMain
- Posts: 4744
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:26 pm
Re: Howard law v. Loyola University Chicago
I don't think the URM thing works the way you think it does, but you seem like you've got it worked out, so...good luck.Strongfaithgirl wrote:As a double minority the statistics that you all have referenced does not applyTheSpanishMain wrote:True, but you implied you wanted Big Law. Getting Big Law is VASTLY more difficult outside of the T14, particularly that far outside of it. If we were talking about a Vanderbilt or a Texas or an Emory, that might be okay at the right price. Loyola or Howard? No.Strongfaithgirl wrote:T14 is NOT the end all be all
You either need to A) accept that you won't get Big Law from either of these schools, and revise your goals. or B) Retake the LSAT.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- BullShitWithBravado
- Posts: 249
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2012 8:29 pm
Re: Howard law v. Loyola University Chicago
While being a URM may give you a slight bump when it comes to legal employment, it won't come close to guaranteeing you a job coming out of law school. I personally know URMs, including AA URMs, graduating from higher ranked schools who are jobless right now.Strongfaithgirl wrote:As a double minority the statistics that you all have referenced does not applyTheSpanishMain wrote:True, but you implied you wanted Big Law. Getting Big Law is VASTLY more difficult outside of the T14, particularly that far outside of it. If we were talking about a Vanderbilt or a Texas or an Emory, that might be okay at the right price. Loyola or Howard? No.Strongfaithgirl wrote:T14 is NOT the end all be all
You either need to A) accept that you won't get Big Law from either of these schools, and revise your goals. or B) Retake the LSAT.
URMs get the biggest bump when getting into law school. If you're a double-URM, that's even more of a reason to retake because there's a good chance that you won't have to improve your numbers by that much to get into a better school. Try not to get offended when people tell you to retake and aim for the T-14…the advice is meant to be encouraging, not mocking.
-
- Posts: 1899
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:41 pm
Re: Howard law v. Loyola University Chicago
Actually, the T14 is the end all. And I go to a school that is Top 40. Retake.
- Typhoon24
- Posts: 649
- Joined: Tue Oct 30, 2012 2:09 pm
Re: Howard law v. Loyola University Chicago
nothingtosee wrote:Howard, if you're looking at the academic hip-hop jurisprudence route.
Also great avatar, she and her wide-chinned predecessor haunted my LSAT dreams.
- Nova
- Posts: 9102
- Joined: Sun Apr 15, 2012 8:55 pm
Re: Howard law v. Loyola University Chicago
Strongfaithgirl wrote:
As a double minority the statistics that you all have referenced does not apply
-
- Posts: 778
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 12:19 pm
Re: Howard law v. Loyola University Chicago
don't go to law school this uninformed
- jingosaur
- Posts: 3188
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 10:33 am
Re: Howard law v. Loyola University Chicago
I thought this:Strongfaithgirl wrote: As a double minority the statistics that you all have referenced does not apply
Kind of similar to special snowflake.
- Aberzombie1892
- Posts: 1908
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 10:56 am
Re: Howard law v. Loyola University Chicago
Neither for free. That applies to everyone, including green transsexual female Martians from an impoverished country on planet Saturn that are first time college graduates that experienced extraordinary discrimination during their lifetime (no offense to any of these groups - I'm just being sure that I cover everything). Don't go to those two places.
- PepperJack
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 1:23 pm
Re: Howard law v. Loyola University Chicago
I met an attorney at Skadden who was also an AA woman from Howard. She was very beautiful and personable, however, and my guess is she graded onto law review even though that never came up. My understanding is that Howard is only valuable if one is an AA hire, because you interview with firms specifically coming there over much higher ranked schools just to consider AA hires. There is definitely a major boost in hiring for AA's, but you need to consider that for the vast majority of AA's at sub-tier 1 law schools, law school does not produce a net positive outcome. The boost only happens if you're valuable to them for more than just being black. The AA is just a bonus, not going to make a median TTT grad employed.KatyMarie wrote:No clue. I know two practicing attorneys who went to Howard, but they're both AA women.Gooner91 wrote:I wonder how placement is for students at Howard who are not AA. Does anybody have any statistics on this?KatyMarie wrote:Hmmm, I don't really know anything about either of those schools....Howard is on this list if it makes you feel any better.
http://abovethelaw.com/2011/03/law-scho ... the-cheap/
Did you get scholarships to either? Since job prospects are going to be pretty tough at either, it's a good idea to improve enough so that you graduate with no, or very little debt.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- PepperJack
- Posts: 643
- Joined: Sun Sep 29, 2013 1:23 pm
Re: Howard law v. Loyola University Chicago
Once in a t-14 that's not necessarily true, but that's another topic. If OP went to a t-14, she'd likely be set if she's not as insufferable as she comes across ITT. AA's consistently get hired from the bottom of the class at most t-14's. However, yes, once outside a certain range of schools they are as f'd as their white peers.BullShitWithBravado wrote:While being a URM may give you a slight bump when it comes to legal employment, it won't come close to guaranteeing you a job coming out of law school. I personally know URMs, including AA URMs, graduating from higher ranked schools who are jobless right now.Strongfaithgirl wrote:As a double minority the statistics that you all have referenced does not applyTheSpanishMain wrote:True, but you implied you wanted Big Law. Getting Big Law is VASTLY more difficult outside of the T14, particularly that far outside of it. If we were talking about a Vanderbilt or a Texas or an Emory, that might be okay at the right price. Loyola or Howard? No.Strongfaithgirl wrote:T14 is NOT the end all be all
You either need to A) accept that you won't get Big Law from either of these schools, and revise your goals. or B) Retake the LSAT.
URMs get the biggest bump when getting into law school. If you're a double-URM, that's even more of a reason to retake because there's a good chance that you won't have to improve your numbers by that much to get into a better school. Try not to get offended when people tell you to retake and aim for the T-14…the advice is meant to be encouraging, not mocking.
- PDaddy
- Posts: 2063
- Joined: Sat Jan 16, 2010 4:40 am
Re: Howard law v. Loyola University Chicago
TITCR by a mile! Lol.nothingtosee wrote:Howard, if you're looking at the academic hip-hop jurisprudence route.
The retake advice is also credited, because it's still an uphill climb regardless.
Seriously, if you absolutely have to pick one, pick Howard. Howard's tuition is much cheaper (what...$24K?). Do you have cheap housing prospects in D.C.?.
But I wouldn't go to any school outside of the T14 right now, and I wouldn't even go to GULC.
-
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Thu Apr 11, 2013 10:29 pm
Re: Howard law v. Loyola University Chicago
.
Last edited by jrd93 on Sat Feb 22, 2014 2:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 109
- Joined: Fri Dec 13, 2013 8:31 pm
Re: Howard law v. Loyola University Chicago
I currently go to Howard for Undergrad and actually, a large number of our law and graduate students are not AA. Before we start making hip hop jokes or assumptions on employment statistics
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
-
- Posts: 1899
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:41 pm
Re: Howard law v. Loyola University Chicago
Good luck with your "wide range of career goals," as there isn't a "wide range of legal job openings."sublime wrote:sparty99 wrote:Actually, the T14 is the end all. And I go to a school that is Top 40. Retake.
This is just silly though. There are a wide range of career goals, personal circumstances, and COA's that can (and often will) make attending outside of the T14 at a discount a good decision.
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- TheSpanishMain
- Posts: 4744
- Joined: Tue Apr 02, 2013 2:26 pm
Re: Howard law v. Loyola University Chicago
C'mon with the hyperbole. So going to Vanderbilt, Texas, Emory, WUSTL, or UCLA for free is a horrible idea?sparty99 wrote:Good luck with your "wide range of career goals," as there isn't a "wide range of legal job openings."sublime wrote:sparty99 wrote:Actually, the T14 is the end all. And I go to a school that is Top 40. Retake.
This is just silly though. There are a wide range of career goals, personal circumstances, and COA's that can (and often will) make attending outside of the T14 at a discount a good decision.
-
- Posts: 1899
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:41 pm
Re: Howard law v. Loyola University Chicago
I never said going to a top 25 school for FREE is a bad decision. In fact, if you read my posts in other forms, I have consistently said that law school is only worth it if its a Top 14 or a full or near scholarship at a Top 50. However, I still contend that the T14 is kind of the be all...The doors that Harvard/Stanford open are just not the same as Texas or UCLA. Whether its inside or outside of law.
- sublime
- Posts: 17385
- Joined: Sun Mar 10, 2013 12:21 pm
-
- Posts: 1899
- Joined: Sat Dec 11, 2010 8:41 pm
Re: Howard law v. Loyola University Chicago
This really isn't important. What is important is that the OP should not attend Howard or Loyola. Additionally, she should not ignore the fact that a legal degree at a T14 is actually really critical if she wants to have a decent shot at getting big law, which is what she wants. Howard and Loyola have quasi-shitty legal opportunities and so you should not go.sublime wrote:sparty99 wrote:I never said going to a top 25 school for FREE is a bad decision. In fact, if you read my posts in other forms, I have consistently said that law school is only worth it if its a Top 14 or a full or near scholarship at a Top 50. However, I still contend that the T14 is kind of the be all...The doors that Harvard/Stanford open are just not the same as Texas or UCLA. Whether its inside or outside of law.
.... that isn't what "end all, be all" means....
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login