http://www.vermontlaw.edu/News_and_Even ... e_Year.htmNova wrote:I really thought you were joking.ericsmith249 wrote:I stand by Vermont's Environmental Law Program.
5th year in a row. The environmental law firms hire in droves.
http://www.vermontlaw.edu/News_and_Even ... e_Year.htmNova wrote:I really thought you were joking.ericsmith249 wrote:I stand by Vermont's Environmental Law Program.
That's just flat out false. *ZERO* firms of 100+ attorneys hired a Vermont Law grad last year, and they regularly place well under 50% of their class into full-time lawyer jobs. Given that the overwhelming bulk of environmental law work is done in big firms (and 100 attorneys is a really low cut-off point for what is considered a "big firm"), I'd say your position holds no water at all. jbagel hit it on the head: being ranked #1 in a specialty ranking doesn't reflect hiring. Their environmental law clinics and classes may be outstanding, but they have putrid employment scores.ericsmith249 wrote:http://www.vermontlaw.edu/News_and_Even ... e_Year.htmNova wrote:I really thought you were joking.ericsmith249 wrote:I stand by Vermont's Environmental Law Program.
5th year in a row. The environmental law firms hire in droves.
Yeah. I think they mainly exist to give every school something to brag about instead of just complaining about the USNWR rankings. For example my undergrad's TTT law school touts their USNWR legal writing ranking instead of bitching about how the rankings are inaccurate.jbagelboy wrote:This - they are more USNWR's way of exploring and recognizing different programs and clinics law schools are trying to stand out, or maybe a professor at the LS who wrote an impressive article read by 120 ppl that year. Unfortunately, they do not reflect actual hiring in that field. Look at the metrics. I wish we could measure hiring specific to something like IP, environmental or international law, but I would go ahead and guess that the hiring lists would resemble the T14 in some variant anyway.romothesavior wrote:Specialty rankings do NOT matter.
I suspect that the school "pulls above its weight" because of region. It's the only law school in the entire state, and one of a tiny handful of schools in the northern New England region. So if you want a state govt job in Vermont or New Hampshire or maybe Maine (to the extent that these jobs exist) it's probably an ok choice. But if you think you'll be battling BP's biglaw attorneys or whatever, No.A. Nony Mouse wrote:To be honest, I do think Vermont pulls above its weight in government/PI environmental hiring. It still doesn't at ALL make specialty rankings a thing, or worth choosing your school based on, and it doesn't make going to Vermont for environmental law a good bet, in part because everyone goes to Vermont wanting to do environmental law, and it's still a tiny percentage of graduates who are going to have good outcomes. But I think it's fair to say that of the people who come out of Vermont getting jobs, a lot do end up doing environmental law in the public sector - it's just still a small number/percentage overall, and small enough not to bank on.
(I don't know anything about the environmental law firm hiring claim.)
Want to continue reading?
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
Well, that's probably true. I was more thinking of specifically environmental fedgov/non-profit jobs, in that I've seen VT grads in these jobs. But like I said, it still doesn't make VT a good option.Void wrote:I suspect that the school "pulls above its weight" because of region. It's the only law school in the entire state, and one of a tiny handful of schools in the northern New England region. So if you want a state govt job in Vermont or New Hampshire or maybe Maine (to the extent that these jobs exist) it's probably an ok choice. But if you think you'll be battling BP's biglaw attorneys or whatever, No.A. Nony Mouse wrote:To be honest, I do think Vermont pulls above its weight in government/PI environmental hiring. It still doesn't at ALL make specialty rankings a thing, or worth choosing your school based on, and it doesn't make going to Vermont for environmental law a good bet, in part because everyone goes to Vermont wanting to do environmental law, and it's still a tiny percentage of graduates who are going to have good outcomes. But I think it's fair to say that of the people who come out of Vermont getting jobs, a lot do end up doing environmental law in the public sector - it's just still a small number/percentage overall, and small enough not to bank on.
(I don't know anything about the environmental law firm hiring claim.)
I see. I admittedly know nothing about these sorts of jerbs.A. Nony Mouse wrote:Well, that's probably true. I was more thinking of specifically environmental fedgov/non-profit jobs, in that I've seen VT grads in these jobs. But like I said, it still doesn't make VT a good option.Void wrote:I suspect that the school "pulls above its weight" because of region. It's the only law school in the entire state, and one of a tiny handful of schools in the northern New England region. So if you want a state govt job in Vermont or New Hampshire or maybe Maine (to the extent that these jobs exist) it's probably an ok choice. But if you think you'll be battling BP's biglaw attorneys or whatever, No.A. Nony Mouse wrote:To be honest, I do think Vermont pulls above its weight in government/PI environmental hiring. It still doesn't at ALL make specialty rankings a thing, or worth choosing your school based on, and it doesn't make going to Vermont for environmental law a good bet, in part because everyone goes to Vermont wanting to do environmental law, and it's still a tiny percentage of graduates who are going to have good outcomes. But I think it's fair to say that of the people who come out of Vermont getting jobs, a lot do end up doing environmental law in the public sector - it's just still a small number/percentage overall, and small enough not to bank on.
(I don't know anything about the environmental law firm hiring claim.)
Yes, I agree. Going to Vermont isn't going to give you an edge up in environmental law over people going to excellent schools (or an edge up in anything). I just find it interesting that of the people who get jobs out of Vermont, a lot actually do get them in environmental law - it's the only school where I've seen any remote correlation between the "specialty" and employment patterns. But to be clear, yes, any of the T14 (or however you want to divide the top schools) will provide you just as many if not more opportunities in environmental law than Vermont does (and many many more other opportunities that Vermont never could).timbs4339 wrote:Anyone thinking that VTs environmental law ranking means more than just how the school markets itself in the law porn sent to other deans and what professors care about has never been to law school.
I went to a T10. Because we were a rich school (like all T10s are), we had an environmental law clinic, access to environmental law internships, several environmental law professors who gave environmental law classes and seminars and an environmental law journal and center. I suspect most other elite law schools are the same. I can't think of anything any specialty program would have that is much different. In fact, elite schools are more likely to be able to provide funding that will allow a student to work at an organization for long enough to get hired. I know several friends who have done this.
That's more than enough exposure to environmental law for any organization (firm or government) to be sure that a candidate is into environmental law. At that point, typical hiring practices kick in, and the T10 resume is going to get the call every single time.
If you're talking about biglaw, where most of the entry-level jobs are going to be, then the same applies.
I worked with one of the top environmental legal orgs in the Northeast. The vast majority of "vermont grads" in our org and the other good orgs were LLM grads who usually had a top-20 JD. There were very, very few Vermont JDs in the top orgs. In fact, one of the other interns was a recent Vermont grad (with honors) who was having a very difficult time getting a job.A. Nony Mouse wrote:Well, that's probably true. I was more thinking of specifically environmental fedgov/non-profit jobs, in that I've seen VT grads in these jobs. But like I said, it still doesn't make VT a good option.Void wrote:I suspect that the school "pulls above its weight" because of region. It's the only law school in the entire state, and one of a tiny handful of schools in the northern New England region. So if you want a state govt job in Vermont or New Hampshire or maybe Maine (to the extent that these jobs exist) it's probably an ok choice. But if you think you'll be battling BP's biglaw attorneys or whatever, No.A. Nony Mouse wrote:To be honest, I do think Vermont pulls above its weight in government/PI environmental hiring. It still doesn't at ALL make specialty rankings a thing, or worth choosing your school based on, and it doesn't make going to Vermont for environmental law a good bet, in part because everyone goes to Vermont wanting to do environmental law, and it's still a tiny percentage of graduates who are going to have good outcomes. But I think it's fair to say that of the people who come out of Vermont getting jobs, a lot do end up doing environmental law in the public sector - it's just still a small number/percentage overall, and small enough not to bank on.
(I don't know anything about the environmental law firm hiring claim.)
I believe you. That also doesn't contradict what I said.AllTheLawz wrote:I worked with one of the top environmental legal orgs in the Northeast. The vast majority of "vermont grads" in our org and the other good orgs were LLM grads who usually had a top-20 JD. There were very, very few Vermont JDs in the top orgs. In fact, one of the other interns was a recent Vermont grad (with honors) who was having a very difficult time getting a job.
Sorry, not meant to contradict. Adding a personal anecdote.A. Nony Mouse wrote:I believe you. That's also not contradicting what I said.AllTheLawz wrote:I worked with one of the top environmental legal orgs in the Northeast. The vast majority of "vermont grads" in our org and the other good orgs were LLM grads who usually had a top-20 JD. There were very, very few Vermont JDs in the top orgs. In fact, one of the other interns was a recent Vermont grad (with honors) who was having a very difficult time getting a job.
Oooooh so maybe the correlation between VT grads and actual environmental jobs is actually a correlation between VT LLM grads and actual environmental jobs?AllTheLawz wrote:
I worked with one of the top environmental legal orgs in the Northeast. The vast majority of "vermont grads" in our org and the other good orgs were LLM grads who usually had a top-20 JD. There were very, very few Vermont JDs in the top orgs. In fact, one of the other interns was a recent Vermont grad (with honors) who was having a very difficult time getting a job.
Register now!
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
Oh, I get you! Sorry if I sounded snooty.AllTheLawz wrote:Sorry, not meant to contradict. Adding a personal anecdote.A. Nony Mouse wrote:I believe you. That's also not contradicting what I said.AllTheLawz wrote:I worked with one of the top environmental legal orgs in the Northeast. The vast majority of "vermont grads" in our org and the other good orgs were LLM grads who usually had a top-20 JD. There were very, very few Vermont JDs in the top orgs. In fact, one of the other interns was a recent Vermont grad (with honors) who was having a very difficult time getting a job.
I actually wouldn't say this is completely correct. The type of work that "big firms" do is actually environmental defense work for major companies. Because of conflicts, big firms will pretty much never do environmental work for the "good side." Biglaw work is not the type of work most people truly interested in environmental law will do. Most of the work will be in gov't agencies, NGOs/PI, and a few smaller "private public interest" firms. Unfortunately, getting a spot in the top NGOs/PI or gov't agencies is generally much, much easier with some time in the litigation practice of a major or well-regarded law firm.romothesavior wrote: That's just flat out false. *ZERO* firms of 100+ attorneys hired a Vermont Law grad last year, and they regularly place well under 50% of their class into full-time lawyer jobs. Given that the overwhelming bulk of environmental law work is done in big firms (and 100 attorneys is a really low cut-off point for what is considered a "big firm"), I'd say your position holds no water at all. jbagel hit it on the head: being ranked #1 in a specialty ranking doesn't reflect hiring. Their environmental law clinics and classes may be outstanding, but they have putrid employment scores.
It might be helpful to have some big firm experience in order to get a job on the good side, though. Very few people in other major class action or impact areas (securities, mass tort, employment, consumer fraud, antitrust) start out in the boutique firms that tend to do that kind of work. That's not to say they wouldn't hire someone from the EPA, but fedgov work tends to correlate with a school's overall biglaw placement.AllTheLawz wrote:I actually wouldn't say this is completely correct. The type of work that "big firms" do is actually environmental defense work for major companies. Because of conflicts, big firms will pretty much never do environmental work for the "good side." Biglaw work is not the type of work most people truly interested in environmental law will do. Most of the work will be in gov't agencies, NGOs/PI, and a few smaller "private public interest" firms. Unfortunately, getting a spot in the top NGOs/PI or gov't agencies is generally much, much easier with some time in the litigation practice of a major or well-regarded law firm.romothesavior wrote: That's just flat out false. *ZERO* firms of 100+ attorneys hired a Vermont Law grad last year, and they regularly place well under 50% of their class into full-time lawyer jobs. Given that the overwhelming bulk of environmental law work is done in big firms (and 100 attorneys is a really low cut-off point for what is considered a "big firm"), I'd say your position holds no water at all. jbagel hit it on the head: being ranked #1 in a specialty ranking doesn't reflect hiring. Their environmental law clinics and classes may be outstanding, but they have putrid employment scores.
True, I should have been more clear: the overwhelming bulk of environmental law work is done in big firms or by big firm veterans who have gone into boutiques or public interest or government work. State and federal EPAs, boutiques and well-regarded private firms, energy and utility companies, and even the PI orgs and NGOs are full of big firm vets. It's not a prerequisite, but there is going to be a very strong correlation between a school's big firm placement and decent environmental law placement. If VT is placing 0% into big firms and less than 50% into FT/LT JD-required jobs, its pretty fair to assume that not many of their grads will end up doing the "sexy" environmental stuff that most folks have in mind when they think of environmental law.AllTheLawz wrote:I actually wouldn't say this is completely correct. The type of work that "big firms" do is actually environmental defense work for major companies. Because of conflicts, big firms will pretty much never do environmental work for the "good side." Biglaw work is not the type of work most people truly interested in environmental law will do. Most of the work will be in gov't agencies, NGOs/PI, and a few smaller "private public interest" firms. Unfortunately, getting a spot in the top NGOs/PI or gov't agencies is generally much, much easier with some time in the litigation practice of a major or well-regarded law firm.romothesavior wrote: That's just flat out false. *ZERO* firms of 100+ attorneys hired a Vermont Law grad last year, and they regularly place well under 50% of their class into full-time lawyer jobs. Given that the overwhelming bulk of environmental law work is done in big firms (and 100 attorneys is a really low cut-off point for what is considered a "big firm"), I'd say your position holds no water at all. jbagel hit it on the head: being ranked #1 in a specialty ranking doesn't reflect hiring. Their environmental law clinics and classes may be outstanding, but they have putrid employment scores.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
It barely pulls its weight in the region. The largest firm in Vermont is about thirty people and there are barely larger firms in New Hampshire. Pierce Atwood, which is the big dog in Maine, wants nothing to do with Vermont Law. Boston is owned by the T14 and BC/BU. UCONN and the few people from the T14 returning to the region own Connecticut (less than 10 Yale graduates take the bar in CT every year) and no few Vermont Law people make it a firm down there. State government jobs in that area are tricky to find with hiring freezes and generally people have to wait for retirements before jobs open in Vermont and New Hampshire.Void wrote:I suspect that the school "pulls above its weight" because of region. It's the only law school in the entire state, and one of a tiny handful of schools in the northern New England region. So if you want a state govt job in Vermont or New Hampshire or maybe Maine (to the extent that these jobs exist) it's probably an ok choice. But if you think you'll be battling BP's biglaw attorneys or whatever, No.A. Nony Mouse wrote:To be honest, I do think Vermont pulls above its weight in government/PI environmental hiring. It still doesn't at ALL make specialty rankings a thing, or worth choosing your school based on, and it doesn't make going to Vermont for environmental law a good bet, in part because everyone goes to Vermont wanting to do environmental law, and it's still a tiny percentage of graduates who are going to have good outcomes. But I think it's fair to say that of the people who come out of Vermont getting jobs, a lot do end up doing environmental law in the public sector - it's just still a small number/percentage overall, and small enough not to bank on.
(I don't know anything about the environmental law firm hiring claim.)
Oh, they come in droves? Can you even name a single environmental law firm off the top of your head? Can you name one that did OCI at Vermont? If you can name one, can you name ten? I'd say ten is barely "droves," but its a step towards substantiation your outrageous and baseless claim. Either you are lying, trolling, or flat out uninformed. None of which is a good thing and I hope you do more research before you start your 1L yearericsmith249 wrote:http://www.vermontlaw.edu/News_and_Even ... e_Year.htmNova wrote:I really thought you were joking.ericsmith249 wrote:I stand by Vermont's Environmental Law Program.
5th year in a row. The environmental law firms hire in droves.
I said northern New England. If you were from New England, like I am, you would know that this doesn't include CT and Mass.GreatNorth87 wrote:It barely pulls its weight in the region. The largest firm in Vermont is about thirty people and there are barely larger firms in New Hampshire. Pierce Atwood, which is the big dog in Maine, wants nothing to do with Vermont Law. Boston is owned by the T14 and BC/BU. UCONN and the few people from the T14 returning to the region own Connecticut (less than 10 Yale graduates take the bar in CT every year) and no few Vermont Law people make it a firm down there. State government jobs in that area are tricky to find with hiring freezes and generally people have to wait for retirements before jobs open in Vermont and New Hampshire.Void wrote:I suspect that the school "pulls above its weight" because of region. It's the only law school in the entire state, and one of a tiny handful of schools in the northern New England region. So if you want a state govt job in Vermont or New Hampshire or maybe Maine (to the extent that these jobs exist) it's probably an ok choice. But if you think you'll be battling BP's biglaw attorneys or whatever, No.A. Nony Mouse wrote:To be honest, I do think Vermont pulls above its weight in government/PI environmental hiring. It still doesn't at ALL make specialty rankings a thing, or worth choosing your school based on, and it doesn't make going to Vermont for environmental law a good bet, in part because everyone goes to Vermont wanting to do environmental law, and it's still a tiny percentage of graduates who are going to have good outcomes. But I think it's fair to say that of the people who come out of Vermont getting jobs, a lot do end up doing environmental law in the public sector - it's just still a small number/percentage overall, and small enough not to bank on.
(I don't know anything about the environmental law firm hiring claim.)
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Already a member? Login
Wait did you just say connecticut and massachusetts arent part of New England?Void wrote:I said northern New England. If you were from New England, like I am, you would know that this doesn't include CT and Mass.GreatNorth87 wrote:It barely pulls its weight in the region. The largest firm in Vermont is about thirty people and there are barely larger firms in New Hampshire. Pierce Atwood, which is the big dog in Maine, wants nothing to do with Vermont Law. Boston is owned by the T14 and BC/BU. UCONN and the few people from the T14 returning to the region own Connecticut (less than 10 Yale graduates take the bar in CT every year) and no few Vermont Law people make it a firm down there. State government jobs in that area are tricky to find with hiring freezes and generally people have to wait for retirements before jobs open in Vermont and New Hampshire.Void wrote:I suspect that the school "pulls above its weight" because of region. It's the only law school in the entire state, and one of a tiny handful of schools in the northern New England region. So if you want a state govt job in Vermont or New Hampshire or maybe Maine (to the extent that these jobs exist) it's probably an ok choice. But if you think you'll be battling BP's biglaw attorneys or whatever, No.A. Nony Mouse wrote:To be honest, I do think Vermont pulls above its weight in government/PI environmental hiring. It still doesn't at ALL make specialty rankings a thing, or worth choosing your school based on, and it doesn't make going to Vermont for environmental law a good bet, in part because everyone goes to Vermont wanting to do environmental law, and it's still a tiny percentage of graduates who are going to have good outcomes. But I think it's fair to say that of the people who come out of Vermont getting jobs, a lot do end up doing environmental law in the public sector - it's just still a small number/percentage overall, and small enough not to bank on.
(I don't know anything about the environmental law firm hiring claim.)
And I wasn't implying that there is a big market in northern New England or really a market at all. (Note "to the extent that these jobs exist"). But I bet if you collected all of the employed lawyers in Vermont you would find that a significant number of them went to Vermont Law- a greater ratio than the number of employed lawyers in Massachusetts who went to Western New England, for instance.
read it again. N-O-R-T-H-E-R-N New England.jbagelboy wrote:Void wrote:Wait did you just say connecticut and massachusetts arent part of New England?GreatNorth87 wrote:
I said northern New England. If you were from New England, like I am, you would know that this doesn't include CT and Mass.
And I wasn't implying that there is a big market in northern New England or really a market at all. (Note "to the extent that these jobs exist"). But I bet if you collected all of the employed lawyers in Vermont you would find that a significant number of them went to Vermont Law- a greater ratio than the number of employed lawyers in Massachusetts who went to Western New England, for instance.
Wtf
Void wrote:I said northern New England. If you were from New England, like I am, you would know that this doesn't include CT and Mass.GreatNorth87 wrote:It barely pulls its weight in the region. The largest firm in Vermont is about thirty people and there are barely larger firms in New Hampshire. Pierce Atwood, which is the big dog in Maine, wants nothing to do with Vermont Law. Boston is owned by the T14 and BC/BU. UCONN and the few people from the T14 returning to the region own Connecticut (less than 10 Yale graduates take the bar in CT every year) and no few Vermont Law people make it a firm down there. State government jobs in that area are tricky to find with hiring freezes and generally people have to wait for retirements before jobs open in Vermont and New Hampshire.Void wrote:I suspect that the school "pulls above its weight" because of region. It's the only law school in the entire state, and one of a tiny handful of schools in the northern New England region. So if you want a state govt job in Vermont or New Hampshire or maybe Maine (to the extent that these jobs exist) it's probably an ok choice. But if you think you'll be battling BP's biglaw attorneys or whatever, No.A. Nony Mouse wrote:To be honest, I do think Vermont pulls above its weight in government/PI environmental hiring. It still doesn't at ALL make specialty rankings a thing, or worth choosing your school based on, and it doesn't make going to Vermont for environmental law a good bet, in part because everyone goes to Vermont wanting to do environmental law, and it's still a tiny percentage of graduates who are going to have good outcomes. But I think it's fair to say that of the people who come out of Vermont getting jobs, a lot do end up doing environmental law in the public sector - it's just still a small number/percentage overall, and small enough not to bank on.
(I don't know anything about the environmental law firm hiring claim.)
And I wasn't implying that there is a big market in northern New England or really a market at all. (Note "to the extent that these jobs exist"). But I bet if you collected all of the employed lawyers in Vermont you would find that a significant number of them went to Vermont Law- a greater ratio than the number of employed lawyers in Massachusetts who went to Western New England, for instance.
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login