USC ($$) vs. UCLA (No $) Forum
-
- Posts: 2
- Joined: Thu Jul 18, 2013 2:30 am
USC ($$) vs. UCLA (No $)
I was wondering if you all could help me weigh in on my decision for choosing a law school.
I'm a SoCal native, went to UCLA for undergrad, and intend on living and practicing in SoCal in the future. I'm interested in entertainment law, but of course it remains to be seen whether I'll actually pursue it once I take a class or two and get to know the industry a bit better.
I have already said yes to UCLA Law, but I was taken off the waitlist for USC recently, and have to choose between the two schools.
USC is giving me $15,000/ year for 3 years (No strings attached...no top 10% conditional stuff) and UCLA isn't giving me a dime. I have the ability to commute to USC (30 mins each way) from home and would have to otherwise rent at UCLA.
While I loved being at UCLA for undergrad and I recognize that its law school is slightly, though not significantly more prestigious in the SoCal area, I don't know if it justifies saving 45,000 over 3 years. Also, UCLA is in a beautiful area, but I already have a Bruin network from undergrad...would it be a better idea to try to get involved with the Trojan network as well?
Can anyone give me some comments about which way I should lean towards? I'd really appreciate it!
I'm a SoCal native, went to UCLA for undergrad, and intend on living and practicing in SoCal in the future. I'm interested in entertainment law, but of course it remains to be seen whether I'll actually pursue it once I take a class or two and get to know the industry a bit better.
I have already said yes to UCLA Law, but I was taken off the waitlist for USC recently, and have to choose between the two schools.
USC is giving me $15,000/ year for 3 years (No strings attached...no top 10% conditional stuff) and UCLA isn't giving me a dime. I have the ability to commute to USC (30 mins each way) from home and would have to otherwise rent at UCLA.
While I loved being at UCLA for undergrad and I recognize that its law school is slightly, though not significantly more prestigious in the SoCal area, I don't know if it justifies saving 45,000 over 3 years. Also, UCLA is in a beautiful area, but I already have a Bruin network from undergrad...would it be a better idea to try to get involved with the Trojan network as well?
Can anyone give me some comments about which way I should lean towards? I'd really appreciate it!
-
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Tue Jul 09, 2013 2:15 pm
Re: USC ($$) vs. UCLA (No $)
Go USC.sunnydayes wrote:I was wondering if you all could help me weigh in on my decision for choosing a law school.
I'm a SoCal native, went to UCLA for undergrad, and intend on living and practicing in SoCal in the future. I'm interested in entertainment law, but of course it remains to be seen whether I'll actually pursue it once I take a class or two and get to know the industry a bit better.
I have already said yes to UCLA Law, but I was taken off the waitlist for USC recently, and have to choose between the two schools.
USC is giving me $15,000/ year for 3 years (No strings attached...no top 10% conditional stuff) and UCLA isn't giving me a dime. I have the ability to commute to USC (30 mins each way) from home and would have to otherwise rent at UCLA.
While I loved being at UCLA for undergrad and I recognize that its law school is slightly, though not significantly more prestigious in the SoCal area, I don't know if it justifies saving 45,000 over 3 years. Also, UCLA is in a beautiful area, but I already have a Bruin network from undergrad...would it be a better idea to try to get involved with the Trojan network as well?
Can anyone give me some comments about which way I should lean towards? I'd really appreciate it!
I am going to be transferring into UCLA in the fall from a different law school and I had to choose between USC and UCLA and it was not easy. Here is what I learned - they are both very lateral. In terms of ranking as you can see they are pretty much neck and neck. UCLA's name might carry you further nationally but regionally, they are both fantastic. Meaning if you wanted to move to NY or somewhere outside of CA to practice I might suggest UCLA but if the goal is to not only stay in CA but SoCal than either is fine. That being said, USC dominates LA with its very strong almost fraternal bond that is its alumni network.
USC is also a smaller sized law school which has many advantages. You will get to know the professors more and get more individualized learning. Granted I am sure the education value is the same or comparable. For me the deciding factor really came down to money. UCLA offered me money and USC did not. Law school is very expensive. Graduating in a rough economy under a pile of debt is scary, no question about it. If you can save a little bit of money with a scholarship, and even more money by living at home, the choice seems rather simple.
When it comes down to it, you really cant go wrong either way and you are in a very good position. That being said, money matters! Go for USC I would say.
-
- Posts: 778
- Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2012 12:19 pm
Re: USC ($$) vs. UCLA (No $)
How is this even a question? USC by a mile.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: USC ($$) vs. UCLA (No $)
http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=206299
You need to answer all those questions first. It's unclear what the price difference is here.
Anyway the correct answer is almost certainly "Neither, retake." UCLA at sticker (instate sticker?) and USC with a 45K discount are both non-starters, that's just way too much debt for a strong regional. This is of course assuming you don't have a rich benefactor paying for the whole venture, but again you didn't tell us all the info we needed.
For the poster who said UCLA is better nationally- even if that's true that doesn't mean it places well nationally at all. People should only go to these schools if they want to live and work in Southern CA long term.
You need to answer all those questions first. It's unclear what the price difference is here.
Anyway the correct answer is almost certainly "Neither, retake." UCLA at sticker (instate sticker?) and USC with a 45K discount are both non-starters, that's just way too much debt for a strong regional. This is of course assuming you don't have a rich benefactor paying for the whole venture, but again you didn't tell us all the info we needed.
For the poster who said UCLA is better nationally- even if that's true that doesn't mean it places well nationally at all. People should only go to these schools if they want to live and work in Southern CA long term.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jselson
- Posts: 6337
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:51 am
Re: USC ($$) vs. UCLA (No $)
USC's at a bigger discount than just 45k because the OP would stay at home.BigZuck wrote:http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=206299
You need to answer all those questions first. It's unclear what the price difference is here.
Anyway the correct answer is almost certainly "Neither, retake." UCLA at sticker (instate sticker?) and USC with a 45K discount are both non-starters, that's just way too much debt for a strong regional. This is of course assuming you don't have a rich benefactor paying for the whole venture, but again you didn't tell us all the info we needed.
For the poster who said UCLA is better nationally- even if that's true that doesn't mean it places well nationally at all. People should only go to these schools if they want to live and work in Southern CA long term.
Without knowing numbers, USC is the easy decision here. (Says the Trojan!)
-
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am
Re: USC ($$) vs. UCLA (No $)
"I have the ability to commute to USC (30 mins each way) from home and would have to otherwise rent at UCLA."jselson wrote:USC's at a bigger discount than just 45k because the OP would stay at home.BigZuck wrote:http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=206299
You need to answer all those questions first. It's unclear what the price difference is here.
Anyway the correct answer is almost certainly "Neither, retake." UCLA at sticker (instate sticker?) and USC with a 45K discount are both non-starters, that's just way too much debt for a strong regional. This is of course assuming you don't have a rich benefactor paying for the whole venture, but again you didn't tell us all the info we needed.
For the poster who said UCLA is better nationally- even if that's true that doesn't mean it places well nationally at all. People should only go to these schools if they want to live and work in Southern CA long term.
Without knowing numbers, USC is the easy decision here. (Says the Trojan!)
yeah that's pretty significant.
-
- Posts: 1417
- Joined: Thu Jan 10, 2013 8:04 pm
Re: USC ($$) vs. UCLA (No $)
This, although the answer is most likely going to be RETAKE.BigZuck wrote:http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=206299
You need to answer all those questions first. It's unclear what the price difference is here.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: USC ($$) vs. UCLA (No $)
My B bros, missed that for some reason. That might make USC worth it maybe, but still need to see how much debt the OP will be in at graduation.zman wrote:"I have the ability to commute to USC (30 mins each way) from home and would have to otherwise rent at UCLA."jselson wrote:USC's at a bigger discount than just 45k because the OP would stay at home.BigZuck wrote:http://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/v ... 1&t=206299
You need to answer all those questions first. It's unclear what the price difference is here.
Anyway the correct answer is almost certainly "Neither, retake." UCLA at sticker (instate sticker?) and USC with a 45K discount are both non-starters, that's just way too much debt for a strong regional. This is of course assuming you don't have a rich benefactor paying for the whole venture, but again you didn't tell us all the info we needed.
For the poster who said UCLA is better nationally- even if that's true that doesn't mean it places well nationally at all. People should only go to these schools if they want to live and work in Southern CA long term.
Without knowing numbers, USC is the easy decision here. (Says the Trojan!)
yeah that's pretty significant.
Even if its like 105K off sticker price I'm not sure USC is worth that. That's kind of skirting the edge IMO.
UCLA definitely isn't worth it in comparison.
What's going on here, is the OP a 160/3.9 type? UCLA has been pretty generous this cycle.
-
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Tue Apr 23, 2013 4:43 pm
Re: USC ($$) vs. UCLA (No $)
USC/UCLA are literally the same in terms of its employment statistics for Southern California. UCLA has a slight edge nationally, though that doesn't even apply here since you said you have the desire to work in Southern California. Moreover, to my understanding, USC has a stronger entertainment program out of the two. I think you already know the answer here, you just want the reassurance.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: USC ($$) vs. UCLA (No $)
Two people have said it so far. What is the source that people are using that points to the fact that UCLA has better placement nationally?
- jselson
- Posts: 6337
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:51 am
Re: USC ($$) vs. UCLA (No $)
UCLA: http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school= ... b=locationBigZuck wrote:Two people have said it so far. What is the source that people are using that points to the fact that UCLA has better placement nationally?
USC: http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school= ... b=location
And UCLA has the better general scholarly reputation. But for a SoCal student, the difference is nigh negligible.
e: And looking historically, USC also seems to perform slightly worse in a downturn. And the slight - SLIGHT - national difference holds up over time.
-
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am
Re: USC ($$) vs. UCLA (No $)
UCLA does pump up its employment numbers by hiring more than 10% of theirs grads themselves. but yeah UCLA has the better rep but it does not translate into better job outcomes.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jselson
- Posts: 6337
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:51 am
Re: USC ($$) vs. UCLA (No $)
Ah, forgot about that. Disregard the "slump" stuff. But national reach is SLIGHTLY better, in the sense that 101 grains of salt is more than 100.zman wrote:UCLA does pump up its employment numbers by hiring more than 10% of theirs grads themselves. but yeah UCLA has the better rep but it does not translate into better job outcomes.
-
- Posts: 11730
- Joined: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:53 am
Re: USC ($$) vs. UCLA (No $)
That's so slight as to be insignificant IMO. Going to either for anything other than a job in Southern CA would be a really bad move I think.
What's a "better general scholarly reputation?"
What's a "better general scholarly reputation?"
- jselson
- Posts: 6337
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:51 am
Re: USC ($$) vs. UCLA (No $)
http://www.leiterrankings.com/new/2012_ ... pact.shtmlBigZuck wrote:That's so slight as to be insignificant IMO. Going to either for anything other than a job in Southern CA would be a really bad move I think.
What's a "better general scholarly reputation?"
and
http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog ... ogle-.html
-
- Posts: 500
- Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am
Re: USC ($$) vs. UCLA (No $)
That's the last thing one should base his/her decision on. That study proves nothing.
He/she could call and ask USC and UCLA for more money, a lot of people are getting more than zero at UCLA and 15 a year at USC.
He/she could call and ask USC and UCLA for more money, a lot of people are getting more than zero at UCLA and 15 a year at USC.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2777
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:19 pm
Re: USC ($$) vs. UCLA (No $)
Negotiate. If it doesn't pan out then drop UCLA for USC. If you think there is a reason to pay 100K more for UCLA, just because of the price difference, then you are acting irrationally.
-
- Posts: 237
- Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2013 1:09 pm
Re: USC ($$) vs. UCLA (No $)
As a lifetime Bruin, this. USC all the way here.timbs4339 wrote:Negotiate. If it doesn't pan out then drop UCLA for USC. If you think there is a reason to pay 100K more for UCLA, just because of the price difference, then you are acting irrationally.
By the way, scholarly reputation is somewhat important, especially if you're looking to get published/get a fellowship and/or build connections with 9th Circuit Judges. UCLA Profs have more force in that area than USC.
I'm waiting for someone to say that academia is highly unlikely from both. To which I obviously agree. But, I still think scholarly reputation is important.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login