what?? undergrad degree is worthless now.. EVERYONE has one, you got to get a graduate degree to really stand out.. and law schools, mad med schools, PhD programs are far more intense than some kind of BA in sociology..Dr. Dre wrote:quality of education only matters in undergrad
law school is all about getting em jerbs
UCI Ranking prediction Forum
-
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Tue Mar 19, 2013 5:09 pm
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
- FKASunny
- Posts: 3904
- Joined: Mon Feb 04, 2013 1:40 am
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
That just supports his point. No one cares where you went to undergrad (arguably outside of HYSP,) as long as it prepared you well for your post graduate degree or gave you skills necessary for a job. The "educational quality" at any of the top law schools could slip for decades before it affects their reputations because going to top schools isn't about providing a superior educational product, it's about credentialing employees so employers don't have to.lawschoolsoldier wrote:what?? undergrad degree is worthless now.. EVERYONE has one, you got to get a graduate degree to really stand out.. and law schools, mad med schools, PhD programs are far more intense than some kind of BA in sociology..Dr. Dre wrote:quality of education only matters in undergrad
law school is all about getting em jerbs
- vanwinkle
- Posts: 8953
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 3:02 am
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
Banned for also being this poster:LiquidJames wrote:go to chapman and you won't disappoint, you will have a better career than if you go to uci law, which honestly, i don't even expect it to last, word
Also, surprisingly unrelated:Meepo wrote:UCI will be lucky to be top 100, what more do you want?
Banned for also being this poster:lawschoolsoldier wrote:what?? undergrad degree is worthless now.. EVERYONE has one, you got to get a graduate degree to really stand out.. and law schools, mad med schools, PhD programs are far more intense than some kind of BA in sociology..
This thread brings all the trolls to the yard.zman wrote:ok back on topic.. why do you have an account for the sole reason of bashing UC Irvine law school?? ahaha you never answered us..
- jbagelboy
- Posts: 10361
- Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2012 7:57 pm
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
Thank you.vanwinkle wrote:Banned for also being this poster:LiquidJames wrote:go to chapman and you won't disappoint, you will have a better career than if you go to uci law, which honestly, i don't even expect it to last, word
Also, surprisingly unrelated:Meepo wrote:UCI will be lucky to be top 100, what more do you want?
Banned for also being this poster:lawschoolsoldier wrote:what?? undergrad degree is worthless now.. EVERYONE has one, you got to get a graduate degree to really stand out.. and law schools, mad med schools, PhD programs are far more intense than some kind of BA in sociology..
This thread brings all the trolls to the yard.zman wrote:ok back on topic.. why do you have an account for the sole reason of bashing UC Irvine law school?? ahaha you never answered us..
-
- Posts: 5
- Joined: Sun Apr 14, 2013 9:24 pm
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
couldn't resist adding chapman law to the spreadsheet to satisfy liquid james:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... nZhQXRqemc
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... nZhQXRqemc
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Meepo
- Posts: 65
- Joined: Wed Dec 26, 2012 9:02 pm
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
hey man, how accurate is this spread sheet? is it a logical prediction? or the numbers published from somewhere? honest question, thxhamsterdam wrote:couldn't resist adding chapman law to the spreadsheet to satisfy liquid james:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... nZhQXRqemc
- dr123
- Posts: 3497
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:38 am
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
What is w/ all the UCI talk recently?
-
- Posts: 181
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2012 3:40 pm
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
I think people just got worked up about having the first set of stats appear from the first graduating class. They are trying to dissect the little information available as much as possible because we'd still have to wait a few years to make any accurate claims on the school.dr123 wrote:What is w/ all the UCI talk recently?