i am not trying to push anything onto anyone, i am not a religious freak, all i am saying is chapman is a competitive school in socal, and i think it is/will be better than uci, that is allManoftheHour wrote:Dude, you've contributed nothing good to this forum. Dre has opened up my mind about the world of pencils. What have you done? Other than push a TTTTTTTTTTT onto us?LiquidJames wrote:how have you been trolling for over 1000 posts and not banned yet? you contribute nothing to the conversation except uci bashingDr. Dre wrote:11 pages of UCI
really?
UCI Ranking prediction Forum
- LiquidJames
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:32 am
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
- scretcher
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 1:54 pm
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
the man has created an alternate universe:ManoftheHour wrote:Dude, you've contributed nothing good to this forum. Dre has opened up my mind about the world of pencils. What have you done? Other than push a TTTTTTTTTTT onto us?LiquidJames wrote:how have you been trolling for over 1000 posts and not banned yet? you contribute nothing to the conversation except uci bashingDr. Dre wrote:11 pages of UCI
really?
LiquidJames wrote:Sidenote: Where do you think chapman compares with other schools in the state? is it Stanford, Cal, UCLA/Chapman/USC?
- LiquidJames
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:32 am
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
right now? in terms of quality of education, not ranking, i think stanford/cal/LA/USC/chapman/davis/hastings/loyola/pepperdine/USD/u of SF/mcgeorge/southwestern/western state/cal western/lincoln/san joaquin valley/uci/people's college
- dr123
- Posts: 3497
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:38 am
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
Chapman trolling? the fuckin shit is this
- dr123
- Posts: 3497
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:38 am
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- LiquidJames
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:32 am
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
i was talking about quality of education, not employment, and i think that employment number is not accuratedr123 wrote:to put this chapman nonsense to rest:
http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=chapman
33.7%
- ManoftheHour
- Posts: 3486
- Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 6:03 pm
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
dr123 wrote:Chapman trolling? the fuckin shit is this
- dr123
- Posts: 3497
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:38 am
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
How does 'quality of education' matter if you cant get a job?LiquidJames wrote:i was talking about quality of education, not employment, and i think that employment number is not accuratedr123 wrote:to put this chapman nonsense to rest:
http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=chapman
33.7%
- LiquidJames
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:32 am
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
can you stop being so rude please?dr123 wrote:How does 'quality of education' matter if you cant get a job?LiquidJames wrote:i was talking about quality of education, not employment, and i think that employment number is not accuratedr123 wrote:to put this chapman nonsense to rest:
http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=chapman
33.7%
- dr123
- Posts: 3497
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:38 am
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
not being rude. care to answer the question?LiquidJames wrote:can you stop being so rude please?dr123 wrote:How does 'quality of education' matter if you cant get a job?LiquidJames wrote:i was talking about quality of education, not employment, and i think that employment number is not accuratedr123 wrote:to put this chapman nonsense to rest:
http://www.lstscorereports.com/?school=chapman
33.7%
- LiquidJames
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:32 am
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
i said the data is probably incorrect, as i know 90% of my fellow classmates have jobs lined up after graduation
- dr123
- Posts: 3497
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:38 am
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
so... your anecdata is more reliable than the data your school reported to NALP?
- LiquidJames
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:32 am
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
so if i saw something happen, i must be dreaming and hallucinating because some other people said otherwise right?dr123 wrote:so... your anecdata is more reliable than the data your school reported to NALP?
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- jselson
- Posts: 6337
- Joined: Sat Jan 05, 2013 3:51 am
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
Why would a school underreport its own data?LiquidJames wrote:so if i saw something happen, i must be dreaming and hallucinating because some other people said otherwise right?dr123 wrote:so... your anecdata is more reliable than the data your school reported to NALP?
- LiquidJames
- Posts: 41
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2013 12:32 am
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
can u guys stop trying to hijack the thread? it's about how shitty UCI is, leave chapman out of it, where's dr.dre when u need him
- dr123
- Posts: 3497
- Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2011 2:38 am
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
yea plus maybe you just hang out with the 33% that find jobs. unless you did an independent polling of all of your classmates you're just talking out of your ass bro.jselson wrote:Why would a school underreport its own data?LiquidJames wrote:so if i saw something happen, i must be dreaming and hallucinating because some other people said otherwise right?dr123 wrote:so... your anecdata is more reliable than the data your school reported to NALP?
-
- Posts: 40
- Joined: Tue Dec 25, 2012 3:51 am
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
Its relevant because you claimed, among other things, that one reason UCI will be bad is because Chapman is by far superior.LiquidJames wrote:can u guys stop trying to hijack the thread? it's about how shitty UCI is, leave chapman out of it, where's dr.dre when u need him
You say 90% of your friends are employed. The question though is, how employed are they? And of course more importantly, how employed is the entire class?
The ABA and NALP enforce specific reporting standards on jobs, which includes among other things, how many students are employed, where they are employed, and if they are using their JD.
You must understand that when such data is available publicly, we understandably are a bit taken aback when your own claim conflicts so much with the public data. Not saying you're wrong, but maybe some supporting details like where these people are placing? By all accounts, a school would seem to have every incentive to report a job rate as high as possible to place in rankings so...
Edit: If you can't or don't wish to answer the question thats cool too. No one's trying to attack your anything here.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
- scretcher
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 1:54 pm
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
People are rude to trolls. It's just inherent.LiquidJames wrote:can you stop being so rude please?
You do know you're a troll, right?
Edit: Just to be clear, us being rude has nothing to do with the fact that you love Chapman. It's because none of the ridiculous things you have claimed have any factual basis, including the "90%" employment rate you just championed. There are so many reasons that number is entirely useless.
- Dmini7
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:20 pm
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
Have you ever thought your classmates are lying about having employment lined up? On a different note: What make you say the quality of education is better at chapman than those other schools? I mean, how do you determine the ranking? I would argue the quality of education is actually best at UCI due to their small class sizes and the professors invested interest on seeing them succeed. UCI is new so the professors have to do all they can to make sure they pump out decent lawyers. Others may disagree which is fine, but I was just curious on what makes you say one school's quality of education is better than others. What factors are important for that?
-
- Posts: 6244
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 6:09 pm
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
quality of education doesn't matter at allDmini7 wrote:Have you ever thought your classmates are lying about having employment lined up? On a different note: What make you say the quality of education is better at chapman than those other schools? I mean, how do you determine the ranking? I would argue the quality of education is actually best at UCI due to their small class sizes and the professors invested interest on seeing them succeed. UCI is new so the professors have to do all they can to make sure they pump out decent lawyers. Others may disagree which is fine, but I was just curious on what makes you say one school's quality of education is better than others. What factors are important for that?
Last edited by Borhas on Sun Jan 28, 2018 1:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- scretcher
- Posts: 70
- Joined: Fri May 25, 2012 1:54 pm
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
maybe to you, but it does to othersBorhas wrote:quality of education doesn't matter at allDmini7 wrote:Have you ever thought your classmates are lying about having employment lined up? On a different note: What make you say the quality of education is better at chapman than those other schools? I mean, how do you determine the ranking? I would argue the quality of education is actually best at UCI due to their small class sizes and the professors invested interest on seeing them succeed. UCI is new so the professors have to do all they can to make sure they pump out decent lawyers. Others may disagree which is fine, but I was just curious on what makes you say one school's quality of education is better than others. What factors are important for that?
and obviously it has nothing to do with employment, bar passage rate, small class sizes, or scholarly impact of professors
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Dmini7
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:20 pm
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
I don't think I said it mattered anywhere. I was just curious how he came up with his ranking...Borhas wrote:quality of education doesn't matter at allDmini7 wrote:Have you ever thought your classmates are lying about having employment lined up? On a different note: What make you say the quality of education is better at chapman than those other schools? I mean, how do you determine the ranking? I would argue the quality of education is actually best at UCI due to their small class sizes and the professors invested interest on seeing them succeed. UCI is new so the professors have to do all they can to make sure they pump out decent lawyers. Others may disagree which is fine, but I was just curious on what makes you say one school's quality of education is better than others. What factors are important for that?
-
- Posts: 6244
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 6:09 pm
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
it doesn't matter to anyone who mattersscretcher wrote:maybe to you, but it does to othersBorhas wrote:quality of education doesn't matter at allDmini7 wrote:Have you ever thought your classmates are lying about having employment lined up? On a different note: What make you say the quality of education is better at chapman than those other schools? I mean, how do you determine the ranking? I would argue the quality of education is actually best at UCI due to their small class sizes and the professors invested interest on seeing them succeed. UCI is new so the professors have to do all they can to make sure they pump out decent lawyers. Others may disagree which is fine, but I was just curious on what makes you say one school's quality of education is better than others. What factors are important for that?
and obviously it has nothing to do with employment, bar passage rate, small class sizes, or scholarly impact of professors
Last edited by Borhas on Sun Jan 28, 2018 1:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 6244
- Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 6:09 pm
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
his rankings don't matter eitherDmini7 wrote:I don't think I said it mattered anywhere. I was just curious how he came up with his ranking...Borhas wrote:quality of education doesn't matter at allDmini7 wrote:Have you ever thought your classmates are lying about having employment lined up? On a different note: What make you say the quality of education is better at chapman than those other schools? I mean, how do you determine the ranking? I would argue the quality of education is actually best at UCI due to their small class sizes and the professors invested interest on seeing them succeed. UCI is new so the professors have to do all they can to make sure they pump out decent lawyers. Others may disagree which is fine, but I was just curious on what makes you say one school's quality of education is better than others. What factors are important for that?
Last edited by Borhas on Sun Jan 28, 2018 1:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
- Dr. Dre
- Posts: 2337
- Joined: Mon Feb 18, 2013 7:10 pm
Re: UCI Ranking prediction
quality of education only matters in undergrad
law school is all about getting em jerbs
law school is all about getting em jerbs
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login