2014 Rankings Released

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
dmwelch29
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:58 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby dmwelch29 » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:55 pm

FeelTheHeat wrote:
dmwelch29 wrote:
Wakelaw15 wrote:
dmwelch29 wrote:I was excited to get into Illinois today, but dropping to 47 put a damper on that. Looks like Wake is back to #1 for me. Still waiting to hear back from slow ol UNC though :|


If you want to practice in the Midwest go to IL. Otherwise WFU is the choice.



Yeah thats what I gotta decide. Probably gonna go where employment prospects are the best.


but what schools can you trust


TRUST NO ONE

User avatar
FeelTheHeat
Posts: 5203
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 2:32 am

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby FeelTheHeat » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:55 pm

neonx wrote:How is Stanford (-1)?


employers flee in DROVES to irving after seeing the OP

User avatar
Good Marshall
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 11:15 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby Good Marshall » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:56 pm

Dr. Dre wrote:
Good Marshall wrote:California was destroyed?! WTF?


how are you surprised by this?


Job prospects are bad here (I know). But man. At least the competition for UCLA took major hits. Hell...aside from Stanford, Berkeley and USC, there is no more in-state competition.

User avatar
justonemoregame
Posts: 1160
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:51 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby justonemoregame » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:57 pm

rad lulz wrote:
justonemoregame wrote:why is lsu ranked so low, don't they employ more people than the other shitty schools ahead of them?

Yeah that's really messed up considering the main thing that US News measures is employment prospects


I thought the USNSNRWR was taking that into account this round. Why is alabama 21

User avatar
vincanity1
Posts: 544
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:40 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby vincanity1 » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:57 pm

Someone probably already posted this but just in case http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9oFM5vxapE&sns=tw

wannabelawstudent
Posts: 2588
Joined: Sat Aug 13, 2011 7:33 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby wannabelawstudent » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:58 pm

Hey since I know some of you already got it. Is that law school compass/full access thing worth $30

User avatar
justonemoregame
Posts: 1160
Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 3:51 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby justonemoregame » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:58 pm

FeelTheHeat wrote:
justonemoregame wrote:why is lsu ranked so low, don't they employ more people than the other shitty schools ahead of them? Anyone notice the price tags by the rankings, is that for all three years or no?


Yup. It's crazy anyone complains about loans...even the best schools only set you back 50k



Kids have everything these days

zman
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby zman » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:58 pm

Good Marshall wrote:
Dr. Dre wrote:
Good Marshall wrote:California was destroyed?! WTF?


how are you surprised by this?


Job prospects are bad here (I know). But man. At least the competition for UCLA took major hits. Hell...aside from Stanford, Berkeley and USC, there is no more in-state competition.


that's more competition than others schools... UT has NONE in texas..

User avatar
Gunnar Stahl
Posts: 1085
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:57 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby Gunnar Stahl » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:59 pm

wannabelawstudent wrote:Hey since I know some of you already got it. Is that law school compass/full access thing worth $30

fuck no why would you give those fucks your money

Wakelaw15
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:13 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby Wakelaw15 » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:59 pm

FeelTheHeat wrote:
dmwelch29 wrote:
Wakelaw15 wrote:
dmwelch29 wrote:I was excited to get into Illinois today, but dropping to 47 put a damper on that. Looks like Wake is back to #1 for me. Still waiting to hear back from slow ol UNC though :|


If you want to practice in the Midwest go to IL. Otherwise WFU is the choice.



Yeah thats what I gotta decide. Probably gonna go where employment prospects are the best.


but what schools can you trust


When I visited wake several students told me their ranking was not as strong as it should be because the administration was honest about employment when other schools falsified. WFU, part of the T36 and moving toward the T14.
Last edited by Wakelaw15 on Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.

rad lulz
Posts: 9844
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby rad lulz » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:59 pm

wannabelawstudent wrote:Hey since I know some of you already got it. Is that law school compass/full access thing worth $30

Dude I cracked the site 45 mins ago. Here's the info you need bro

User avatar
Poo-T
Posts: 266
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:32 am

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby Poo-T » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:59 pm

It says here you went to Fordham? Care to explain this?

Image

User avatar
Gunnar Stahl
Posts: 1085
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:57 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby Gunnar Stahl » Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:00 pm

Wakelaw15 wrote: moving toward the T14.

lol

User avatar
Good Marshall
Posts: 18
Joined: Thu Jan 31, 2013 11:15 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby Good Marshall » Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:01 pm

IAFG wrote:
Dr. Dre wrote:
Good Marshall wrote:California was destroyed?! WTF?


how are you surprised by this?

Why are you not?


Maybe Irvine is projected to absorb some of the OC market. Couple that with the high saturation in the state and maybe the calculus presented many Cali schools as a "bad buy." IDK.

dmwelch29
Posts: 23
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2013 1:58 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby dmwelch29 » Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:01 pm

vincanity1 wrote:Someone probably already posted this but just in case http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9oFM5vxapE&sns=tw



Bob is pro at getting interviewed

User avatar
pedestrian
Posts: 461
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 9:38 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby pedestrian » Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:02 pm

ImNoScar wrote:
TTRansfer wrote:LOL @ Pitt's epic 22 spot slide. Now tied with WVU. That should help the rivalry there. LULZ.

That's awful. Maybe it'll finally convince them to change their fin aid policies.


Both schools look awful, but Pitt is lucky to be tied. Significantly more expensive and half the employment. Poor kids.

University of Pittsburgh wrote:Tuition and fees
Full-time: $29,468 per year (in-state)
Full-time: $36,444 per year (out-of-state)
Room and board: $16,052

Careers
Employed at graduation 24.1%
Median private sector starting salary $58,000
Median public service starting salary $40,000


West Virginia University wrote:Tuition and fees
Full-time: $17,240 per year (in-state)
Full-time: $32,924 per year (out-of-state)
Room and board: $10,188

Careers
Employed at graduation 52.8%
Median private sector starting salary $72,000
Median public service starting salary $46,416

User avatar
FeelTheHeat
Posts: 5203
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 2:32 am

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby FeelTheHeat » Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:02 pm

Ghost93 wrote:
Wakelaw15 wrote: moving toward the T14.

lol


i'm moving towards being a millionaire

User avatar
Crowing
Posts: 2636
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 4:20 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby Crowing » Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:03 pm

FeelTheHeat wrote:
Ghost93 wrote:
Wakelaw15 wrote: moving toward the T14.

lol


i'm moving towards being a millionaire


I'm moving towards retirement.

Oh wait, nvm.

User avatar
Emma.
Posts: 2401
Joined: Sun Oct 05, 2008 7:57 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby Emma. » Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:04 pm

neonx wrote:How is Stanford (-1)?


Agreed. If Stanford is -1, then by the same logic Columbia should be too.

User avatar
Gunnar Stahl
Posts: 1085
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:57 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby Gunnar Stahl » Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:04 pm

FeelTheHeat wrote:
Ghost93 wrote:
Wakelaw15 wrote: moving toward the T14.

lol


i'm moving towards being a millionaire

me too, slowly but surely

User avatar
Tiago Splitter
Posts: 15506
Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2011 1:20 am

Re: 2014 Rankings Released

Postby Tiago Splitter » Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:05 pm

UC Davis looking like a bargain for out-of-staters at just under $59K/year

User avatar
Bildungsroman
Posts: 5548
Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby Bildungsroman » Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:05 pm

Emma. wrote:
neonx wrote:How is Stanford (-1)?


Agreed. If Stanford is -1, then by the same logic Columbia should be too.

That's a solution I can get behind.

florida1949
Posts: 262
Joined: Fri Oct 19, 2012 2:37 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings Released

Postby florida1949 » Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:05 pm

Tiago Splitter wrote:UC Davis looking like a bargain for out-of-staters at just under $59K/year


lolo

User avatar
Gunnar Stahl
Posts: 1085
Joined: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:57 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings Released

Postby Gunnar Stahl » Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:06 pm

Tiago Splitter wrote:UC Davis looking like a bargain for out-of-staters at just under $59K/year

:lol:

User avatar
rickgrimes69
Posts: 1107
Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2012 8:56 am

Re: 2014 Rankings Released

Postby rickgrimes69 » Mon Mar 11, 2013 11:07 pm

Major lulz at Mich moving up in the face of TTT employment stats

EDIT: double lulz that Penn is still tied with UVa




Return to “Choosing a Law School”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: galeatus, pd_1023 and 2 guests