2014 Rankings Released

(Rankings, Profiles, Tuition, Student Life, . . . )
User avatar
TTRansfer
Posts: 3796
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:08 am

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby TTRansfer » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:24 pm

What is the raw score for GW?

Wakelaw15
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:13 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby Wakelaw15 » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:24 pm

Going forward, the relevant groupings at HYS, T14, and T36.

User avatar
alwayssunnyinfl
Posts: 4100
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby alwayssunnyinfl » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:24 pm

pedestrian wrote:
justwalkawayrenee wrote:Chicago ties Columbia, and still most of America probably thinks we're a community college.


Yes, and sadly there is no way to explain that you are "as good as the ivies" without sounding like a Tufts UG.

:lol: :lol: :lol:

itachiuchiha
Posts: 907
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 9:59 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby itachiuchiha » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:24 pm

WF is a mover!!! And FSU is now back in the T50. I can't wait until next cycle starts!!!!

User avatar
TTRansfer
Posts: 3796
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:08 am

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby TTRansfer » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:25 pm

Poo-T wrote:I would like to see Wake surpass UNC while I'm there, though.


Well, snowflake, you can help make that happen!!!! :lol:

rad lulz
Posts: 9844
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby rad lulz » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:25 pm

TTRansfer wrote:What is the raw score for GW?

Got you covered bro

User avatar
alwayssunnyinfl
Posts: 4100
Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby alwayssunnyinfl » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:25 pm

itachiuchiha wrote:WF is a mover!!! And FSU is now back in the T50. I can't wait until next cycle starts!!!!


FSU being in the T50 is useless. It's still UF/FSU>>> UM >>> Everyone else. Nothing has changed. Nothing.

User avatar
hephaestus
Posts: 2385
Joined: Mon Jan 07, 2013 4:21 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby hephaestus » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:26 pm

Wakelaw15 wrote:Going forward, the relevant groupings at HYS, T14, and T36.

Lol

User avatar
TTRansfer
Posts: 3796
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:08 am

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby TTRansfer » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:26 pm

LOL @ Pitt's epic 22 spot slide. Now tied with WVU. That should help the rivalry there. LULZ.

User avatar
jay115
Posts: 450
Joined: Mon Jun 30, 2008 12:01 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby jay115 » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:27 pm

I thought that UCI was supposed to be ranked this year?

mb9113
Posts: 27
Joined: Sat Mar 09, 2013 1:13 am

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby mb9113 » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:28 pm

Top two choices tied this year.

Now I can--with absolutely no pretense-- say that rankings play will no role in my decision.

I WON, US NEWS.

itachiuchiha
Posts: 907
Joined: Tue Nov 06, 2012 9:59 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby itachiuchiha » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:28 pm

alwayssunnyinfl wrote:
itachiuchiha wrote:WF is a mover!!! And FSU is now back in the T50. I can't wait until next cycle starts!!!!


FSU being in the T50 is useless. It's still UF/FSU>>> UM >>> Everyone else. Nothing has changed. Nothing.


Indeed, but I am more interested in UF v. FSU, I want to see FSU surpass UF in the future

User avatar
Poo-T
Posts: 266
Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:32 am

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby Poo-T » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:28 pm

TTRansfer wrote:
Poo-T wrote:I would like to see Wake surpass UNC while I'm there, though.


Well, snowflake, you can help make that happen!!!! :lol:

yay!!! :lol:

User avatar
JCougar
Posts: 3175
Joined: Tue Dec 30, 2008 8:47 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby JCougar » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:29 pm

Holy crap...Dean Mitchell's "It's still a good idea to go!!!" school sinks to #68.

rad lulz
Posts: 9844
Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby rad lulz » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:29 pm

itachiuchiha wrote:
alwayssunnyinfl wrote:
itachiuchiha wrote:WF is a mover!!! And FSU is now back in the T50. I can't wait until next cycle starts!!!!


FSU being in the T50 is useless. It's still UF/FSU>>> UM >>> Everyone else. Nothing has changed. Nothing.


Indeed, but I am more interested in UF v. FSU, I want to see FSU surpass UF in the future

Me too

DROVES of employer will recruit at FSU

But not UF

User avatar
TTRansfer
Posts: 3796
Joined: Sat Jan 21, 2012 12:08 am

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby TTRansfer » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:31 pm

rad lulz wrote:
TTRansfer wrote:What is the raw score for GW?

Got you covered bro


Shiiiiiit, I already know that man. This is just for my own curiosity's sake. I'm sure our firedold dean won't take credit for our dip to 21.

User avatar
sdmelzer
Posts: 100
Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2012 7:01 am

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby sdmelzer » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:31 pm

Surprised no one has really commented on the Fordham drop. Pretty substantial.

Citizen Genet
Posts: 516
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 10:03 am

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby Citizen Genet » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:31 pm

No methodology changes this year. So they continue to count short-term school-funded positions as employed.

Also, UIUC is doing their best Blagojevich.

User avatar
FeelTheHeat
Posts: 5203
Joined: Tue Jan 18, 2011 2:32 am

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby FeelTheHeat » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:31 pm

sdmelzer wrote:Surprised no one has really commented on the Fordham drop. Pretty substantial.


Sorry, was pouring a 40oz out for their employment prospects

User avatar
JayJones78
Posts: 2025
Joined: Thu Dec 06, 2012 3:50 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby JayJones78 » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:33 pm

sdmelzer wrote:Surprised no one has really commented on the Fordham drop. Pretty substantial.

User avatar
dproduct
Posts: 4087
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 8:58 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby dproduct » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:33 pm

FeelTheHeat wrote:
sdmelzer wrote:Surprised no one has really commented on the Fordham drop. Pretty substantial.


Sorry, was pouring a 40oz out for their employment prospects


Employed at graduation * 43.9%

JFC

Wakelaw15
Posts: 108
Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:13 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby Wakelaw15 » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:34 pm

JayJones78 wrote:
sdmelzer wrote:Surprised no one has really commented on the Fordham drop. Pretty substantial.


People on here have recently talked about paying sticker @ Fordham. I hope no one is thinking that any more.

zman
Posts: 500
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 9:31 am

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby zman » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:34 pm

jay115 wrote:I thought that UCI was supposed to be ranked this year?


nope 2015 based on the 2014 class.

Void
Posts: 857
Joined: Fri Sep 30, 2011 10:56 am

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby Void » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:35 pm

I noticed that Villanova has returned to the T2, after being slapped into the StraTTTosphere following their scandal. Maybe in a few years they'll be back in the 60s.

User avatar
jne381
AIPAC Chairman's Council Donor
Posts: 5749
Joined: Wed Dec 20, 2006 10:38 pm

Re: 2014 Rankings (release date: March 12, 2013)

Postby jne381 » Mon Mar 11, 2013 10:36 pm

Citizen Genet wrote:No methodology changes this year. So they continue to count short-term school-funded positions as employed.


Is this confirmed that they made no methodology changes with regard to employment, or are you just making this up.




Return to “Choosing a Law School”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests