2014 Rankings Released Forum
- ManOfTheMinute
- Posts: 1557
- Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:54 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
YO OP ... assuming HLS and SLS tie, I don't think putting a -1 next to SLS is right. that is all.
- alwayssunnyinfl
- Posts: 4100
- Joined: Tue Mar 13, 2012 9:34 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
How much did you get from UCI?
-
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:13 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Where is WFU in the leaked rankings?
- Bildungsroman
- Posts: 5529
- Joined: Sun Apr 11, 2010 2:42 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
If the info on the front page is right expect the employers to flock to Alabama IN DROVES.
- Dmini7
- Posts: 724
- Joined: Tue Sep 18, 2012 2:20 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
All we know is that it went up. I would bet it managed to get in the thirties since it apparently went up enough for Mike to notice/comment on its movement.Wakelaw15 wrote:Where is WFU in the leaked rankings?
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- Cobretti
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
this guyalwayssunnyinfl wrote:Oh, I didn't realize people were saying that. Yeah, that's pretty ridiculous.mrizza wrote:Right, but even if it drops to half that, it would be around 34 for that ranking. However, this is also a school with a very strong PI focus so that rank isn't even focusing on what Chemerinsky is guiding them towards. Their clerkship numbers were also an incredibly high %. The point is UCI is very clearly a T1. It will probably start at USNWR 35-45 IMO, calling it a TTT is ridiculous. Telling people to go to USD/loyola over it is also ridiculous.Presidentjlh wrote:23.21% in NLJ250. Class size is small, however.mrizza wrote: Edit: guess I can't link directly to a particular school, but you can look it up from there
Take a chance on UCI if you like Orange County / have connections in Southern California. Do not go there if you're from North Carolina and think you want to have a job in LA.
-
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:13 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Can you link me? I'm not sure who mike is.Dmini7 wrote:All we know is that it went up. I would bet it managed to get in the thirties since it apparently went up enough for Mike to notice/comment on its movement.Wakelaw15 wrote:Where is WFU in the leaked rankings?
- Cobretti
- Posts: 2593
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 12:45 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
https://twitter.com/SpiveyConsultWakelaw15 wrote:Can you link me? I'm not sure who mike is.Dmini7 wrote:All we know is that it went up. I would bet it managed to get in the thirties since it apparently went up enough for Mike to notice/comment on its movement.Wakelaw15 wrote:Where is WFU in the leaked rankings?
- 99.9luft
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:32 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
i know what you mean, but can we really expect a school to gain in reputation (hence in rank) in 5 years? 10 years?Presidentjlh wrote:I know UCI has decent LSAT/GPA medians, but, how much reputation can a school started in 2009 really have? Also, there's no jobs as of yet, as far as I know, since I think the first class graduates this year. Lots of unknowns.99.9luft wrote: where in the ranking equation is the alumni base and how much is it weighed? i thought the reputation, clerking, jobs, LSAT/GPA medians, faculty ratio, etc. are more important...but I may not remember the formula well enough.
I was mostly just poking fun. UCI could be a decent law school in the future. Right now, I'm too hesitant. I say it starts upper TT, maybe.
I think UCLA being the newest top school is still hurt by its relatively new reputation, correct? And it's been around for what, 30 years?
I have an issue with the whole reputation criteria because it favors schools that have generations of alumni, so we can't expect UCI (or any new LS really) to acquire this peer reputation fast enough, despite its potentially great instruction and job placement, among other relatively faster-to-improve factors.
Another thing i don't understand is how regional is this reputation factor. For example, SoCal attorneys and judges may like UCLA a lot but it may not be enough to give it a true national swag. Same with UCI, potentially. Maybe it will be the rockstar of Orange County/SD markets but outside that it will have an unimportant/unknown reputation.
Anyway, just thinking out loud...
ETA: typos
-
- Posts: 18203
- Joined: Wed Oct 14, 2009 10:47 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
CHICAGO BIGLAW CANCELING UIUC OCI BOOKING INDIANA
- Ruxin1
- Posts: 1275
- Joined: Fri Jul 23, 2010 3:12 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Lol at 99.9's reasoning of BUT ONLY HALF THE CLASS DID OCI...yeah bottom of the class doodz probably had no shot anyway.
- 99.9luft
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:32 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
haha, or they are PI ppl, maybe?Ruxin1 wrote:Lol at 99.9's reasoning of BUT ONLY HALF THE CLASS DID OCI...yeah bottom of the class doodz probably had no shot anyway.
-
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2013 5:38 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
That Washington Examiner story is now down...
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 424
- Joined: Thu Nov 24, 2011 5:49 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Obama's America.dummy1 wrote:That Washington Examiner story is now down...
-
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:13 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Thanks for the link mrizza. I predict wfu at #39.
- byronmullens
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Mon Jan 10, 2011 5:09 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Last year rankings were released by this time and had countdown clock, I'd guess they won't come out until tomorrow around 8am.
-
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Sat Mar 05, 2011 12:57 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Lol at Illinois...
At the end of the day, people care about jobs, and law firms will come (at least in the short term) either way. Illinois's NLJ 250 placement is twice as high as Indiana, Iowa, and Wisconsin. Almost twice as high as Minnesota. So.... Minnesota can keep the top 20 ranking, we can keep the jobs.. (the few we have).
At the end of the day, people care about jobs, and law firms will come (at least in the short term) either way. Illinois's NLJ 250 placement is twice as high as Indiana, Iowa, and Wisconsin. Almost twice as high as Minnesota. So.... Minnesota can keep the top 20 ranking, we can keep the jobs.. (the few we have).
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 741
- Joined: Tue May 03, 2011 2:26 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Cooley at #2. Calling it now.
- Poo-T
- Posts: 266
- Joined: Fri Jul 06, 2012 10:32 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
I hope so. That would be awesome!Wakelaw15 wrote:Thanks for the link mrizza. I predict wfu at #39.
- Presidentjlh
- Posts: 865
- Joined: Mon Dec 03, 2012 6:07 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
With so much library space and access to water fountains, it's a given.Uschoolqb10 wrote:Cooley at #2. Calling it now.
-
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Tue Aug 21, 2012 11:54 am
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
lol99.9luft wrote:haha, or they are PI ppl, maybe?Ruxin1 wrote:Lol at 99.9's reasoning of BUT ONLY HALF THE CLASS DID OCI...yeah bottom of the class doodz probably had no shot anyway.
Cal and UCLA will probably be the only UCs to have dat national swag.99.9luft wrote: Another thing i don't understand is how regional is this reputation factor. For example, SoCal attorneys and judges may like UCLA a lot but it may not be enough to give it a true national swag. Same with UCI, potentially. Maybe it will be the rockstar of Orange County/SD markets but outside that it will have an unimportant/unknown reputation.
Anyway, just thinking out loud...
ETA: typos
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- 99.9luft
- Posts: 1234
- Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 4:32 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
agreed. But still doesn't resolve my question... How can UCLA achieve this national swag in 30 or so years since being founded when USC Law (founded in 1896) is still a regional (at best CA) school.Itinerant wrote:Cal and UCLA will probably be the only UCs to have dat national swag.99.9luft wrote: Another thing i don't understand is how regional is this reputation factor. For example, SoCal attorneys and judges may like UCLA a lot but it may not be enough to give it a true national swag. Same with UCI, potentially. Maybe it will be the rockstar of Orange County/SD markets but outside that it will have an unimportant/unknown reputation.
Anyway, just thinking out loud...
ETA: typos
-
- Posts: 108
- Joined: Mon Jul 23, 2012 7:13 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
I think it will be #38, 39, 40, or 41, based on some calculations.Poo-T wrote:I hope so. That would be awesome!Wakelaw15 wrote:Thanks for the link mrizza. I predict wfu at #39.
- EvilClinton
- Posts: 333
- Joined: Wed Aug 15, 2012 6:45 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
Any verification on the leaked list?
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: 2014 Rankings Waiting Thread
DROVESBildungsroman wrote:If the info on the front page is right expect the employers to flock to Alabama IN DROVES.
I TELL YOU
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login