St. John's v. Rutgers - Newark Forum
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:07 am
St. John's v. Rutgers - Newark
Thoughts on this?
- The Rover
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:06 am
Re: St. John's v. Rutgers - Newark
How about some more details for us to work with. Where are you from, where do you want to work, etc.
-
- Posts: 2777
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:19 pm
Re: St. John's v. Rutgers - Newark
What is your expected COA at each school?
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:07 am
Re: St. John's v. Rutgers - Newark
I am comparing these two schools with plans to work in the NYC market if I attend one of them. I have not heard back from either yet; however, I expect I will recieve scholarships at both (not full rides but a decent amount), so I do not know what my COA will be yet. Just throwing this out there looking for any helpful advice if they differ much, if job prospects out of each will differ significantly, or for anyones input on their personal learnings about each school and which they prefer.
- Eberry
- Posts: 14445
- Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2012 10:32 am
Re: St. John's v. Rutgers - Newark
Paging Nova.
Want to continue reading?
Register now to search topics and post comments!
Absolutely FREE!
Already a member? Login
- The Rover
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:06 am
Re: St. John's v. Rutgers - Newark
Neither are great for NYC. Follow the money. What is your GPA / LSAT?
- 20130312
- Posts: 3814
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:53 pm
- ndirish2010
- Posts: 2985
- Joined: Mon Dec 14, 2009 4:41 pm
Re: St. John's v. Rutgers - Newark
Rutgers with full ride if you have ties to NJ and want to stay there. Otherwise, retake.
-
- Posts: 18585
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:52 am
Re: St. John's v. Rutgers - Newark
InGoodFaith wrote:Retake.
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:07 am
Re: St. John's v. Rutgers - Newark
Numbers are 3.97/157. I'm from PA, but Rutgers has options for gaining residency quickly which makes it appealing for price.
- 20130312
- Posts: 3814
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:53 pm
Re: St. John's v. Rutgers - Newark
REEEETAAAAAAKEruralaw wrote:Numbers are 3.97/157.
- Eberry
- Posts: 14445
- Joined: Fri Jun 29, 2012 10:32 am
Re: St. John's v. Rutgers - Newark
ruralaw wrote:Numbers are 3.97/157.
Please don't waste that GPA. Retake.
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:07 am
Re: St. John's v. Rutgers - Newark
Probably should have. I was lazy and didn't study first time around.InGoodFaith wrote:REEEETAAAAAAKEruralaw wrote:Numbers are 3.97/157.
Register now!
Resources to assist law school applicants, students & graduates.
It's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 2777
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:19 pm
Re: St. John's v. Rutgers - Newark
Reel em' in there.ruralaw wrote:Probably should have. I was lazy and didn't study first time around.InGoodFaith wrote:REEEETAAAAAAKEruralaw wrote:Numbers are 3.97/157.
- 20130312
- Posts: 3814
- Joined: Wed Nov 09, 2011 8:53 pm
Re: St. John's v. Rutgers - Newark
Don't know what you mean by "should have." Just retake dude. Harvard wants you. Penn on a full ride wants you.ruralaw wrote:Probably should have. I was lazy and didn't study first time around.InGoodFaith wrote:REEEETAAAAAAKEruralaw wrote:Numbers are 3.97/157.
- The Rover
- Posts: 97
- Joined: Tue Apr 17, 2012 9:06 am
Re: St. John's v. Rutgers - Newark
Retake. Consider sitting out a cycle and applying for class of 2017. With that GPA the sky is the limit. Next year you could be deciding between Columbia and NYU instead of St. John's and Rutgers
-
- Posts: 18585
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:52 am
Re: St. John's v. Rutgers - Newark
I'd do a whole lot of unmentionable things to have that GPA, and I'd study my ass off for the LSAT. PLEASE, FOR MY SAKE.
Get unlimited access to all forums and topics
Register now!
I'm pretty sure I told you it's FREE...
Already a member? Login
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:07 am
Re: St. John's v. Rutgers - Newark
Thanks guys. You're all correct; I should retake and give myself my best possible option. But, if I didn't retake, does my decision between these two schools matter? I know neither give me strong job prospects after, but curious if you guys think one is better than the other.
-
- Posts: 2777
- Joined: Sat Apr 02, 2011 12:19 pm
Re: St. John's v. Rutgers - Newark
Well, what law do you want to practice?ruralaw wrote:Thanks guys. You're all correct; I should retake and give myself my best possible option. But, if I didn't retake, does my decision between these two schools matter? I know neither give me strong job prospects after, but curious if you guys think one is better than the other.
-
- Posts: 9807
- Joined: Sun Feb 19, 2012 10:53 pm
Re: St. John's v. Rutgers - Newark
Just go to either school and fuck up your life.
Communicate now with those who not only know what a legal education is, but can offer you worthy advice and commentary as you complete the three most educational, yet challenging years of your law related post graduate life.
Register now, it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login
- dingbat
- Posts: 4974
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 9:12 pm
Re: St. John's v. Rutgers - Newark
that depends on how you'd answer the following question:ruralaw wrote:Thanks guys. You're all correct; I should retake and give myself my best possible option. But, if I didn't retake, does my decision between these two schools matter? I know neither give me strong job prospects after, but curious if you guys think one is better than the other.
Would you rather be castrated with a rusty teaspoon or have your nuts crushed with a sledgehammer?
If you tried to answer the question, go to Rutgers (less horrible than St. Johns). Otherwise, don't go to either, sit out a cycle and retake
-
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Fri Dec 28, 2012 11:07 am
Re: St. John's v. Rutgers - Newark
Cool. Thanks.rad lulz wrote:Just go to either school and fuck up your life.
-
- Posts: 18585
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 1:52 am
Re: St. John's v. Rutgers - Newark
dingbat wrote:that depends on how you'd answer the following question:ruralaw wrote:Thanks guys. You're all correct; I should retake and give myself my best possible option. But, if I didn't retake, does my decision between these two schools matter? I know neither give me strong job prospects after, but curious if you guys think one is better than the other.
Would you rather be castrated with a rusty teaspoon or have your nuts crushed with a sledgehammer?
If you tried to answer the question, go to Rutgers (less horrible than St. Johns). Otherwise, don't go to either, sit out a cycle and retake
-
- Posts: 688
- Joined: Mon Dec 12, 2011 9:44 am
Re: St. John's v. Rutgers - Newark
A story:
Last spring, I had a 30-minute phone conversation with an 0L who had graduated the year before from a top college with a 3.9something GPA. She had done a half-baked (really more quarter-baked from the sound of it) job of preparing for the LSAT and had gotten a 160 the previous October. She then ED'd to a top 40ish law school with pretty bad employment stats and was accepted at sticker. She was planning to 100% debt-finance law school, even though she was currently employed by a low-paying but interesting non-profit. Now she was having second thoughts.
In the course of the conversation I told her that I was normally fairly cautious about telling people that I didn't know what to do, but in her case she would be crazy not to re-take -- that a couple hundred hours of studying could quite possibly save her hundreds of thousands of dollars, so in effect she would be paying herself $1000 an hour if she made bumping her LSAT a few points her main job over the summer. She was extremely grateful and thanked me for keeping her from making a huge life mistake.
I just checked the web site of the school to which she ED'd and she's a 1L there.
Last spring, I had a 30-minute phone conversation with an 0L who had graduated the year before from a top college with a 3.9something GPA. She had done a half-baked (really more quarter-baked from the sound of it) job of preparing for the LSAT and had gotten a 160 the previous October. She then ED'd to a top 40ish law school with pretty bad employment stats and was accepted at sticker. She was planning to 100% debt-finance law school, even though she was currently employed by a low-paying but interesting non-profit. Now she was having second thoughts.
In the course of the conversation I told her that I was normally fairly cautious about telling people that I didn't know what to do, but in her case she would be crazy not to re-take -- that a couple hundred hours of studying could quite possibly save her hundreds of thousands of dollars, so in effect she would be paying herself $1000 an hour if she made bumping her LSAT a few points her main job over the summer. She was extremely grateful and thanked me for keeping her from making a huge life mistake.
I just checked the web site of the school to which she ED'd and she's a 1L there.
Seriously? What are you waiting for?
Now there's a charge.
Just kidding ... it's still FREE!
Already a member? Login