Re: Class sizes and medians (c/o 2015)
Posted: Sat Sep 22, 2012 10:18 am
St. John's
Enrolled: 265 (-28)
Enrolled: 265 (-28)
Law School Discussion Forums
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/
https://www.top-law-schools.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=190807
Nova convinced someone with a 165 to go there? Dear god. If you're 15 points above median, probably not a good idea.justonemoregame wrote:Nova Southeastern
Enrolled: 380 (includes 62 part-time) / LST shows 354 from last year
147 (-1) / 150 (0) /153 (+1)
range: 139 - 165 (splitter-friendly)
2.93 (- .05) / 3.14 (- .08) / 3.37 (- .06)
Hopefully they attended for freeWanderingPondering wrote:Nova convinced someone with a 165 to go there? Dear god. If you're 15 points above median, probably not a good idea.justonemoregame wrote:Nova Southeastern
Enrolled: 380 (includes 62 part-time) / LST shows 354 from last year
147 (-1) / 150 (0) /153 (+1)
range: 139 - 165 (splitter-friendly)
2.93 (- .05) / 3.14 (- .08) / 3.37 (- .06)
Some of the things I read on these law school websites; it's like watching an info-mercial.stillwater wrote:Cooley: A chicken in every pot, a JD on every wall!
LOL at shit-mills tryna look respectable.justonemoregame wrote:Some of the things I read on these law school websites; it's like watching an info-mercial.stillwater wrote:Cooley: A chicken in every pot, a JD on every wall!
from Florida Coastal: "The School of Law admits students selectively. More highly qualified applicants typically are admitted first." Pretty rich considering well over half the class scored below average on the LSAT and struggled to maintain a B average in college.
[Cackles gleefully]justonemoregame wrote:Seton Hall
Enrolled: 206 (-60)
154 (-1) /158 (-1) / 161 (0)
3.23 (+ .01) / 3.5 (no change) / 3.72 (+ .06)
I am seriously hoping some of these dumpster fires close up shop in the coming years when they just can't put together a class anymore.Paul Campos wrote:[Cackles gleefully]justonemoregame wrote:Seton Hall
Enrolled: 206 (-60)
154 (-1) /158 (-1) / 161 (0)
3.23 (+ .01) / 3.5 (no change) / 3.72 (+ .06)
It's incredible (and awesome) that SHU could cut the class by more than 20% and still lose a point on the LSAT median. But hey, apply now! Things won't ever be this easy again!Real Madrid wrote:I am seriously hoping some of these dumpster fires close up shop in the coming years when they just can't put together a class anymore.Paul Campos wrote:[Cackles gleefully]justonemoregame wrote:Seton Hall
Enrolled: 206 (-60)
154 (-1) /158 (-1) / 161 (0)
3.23 (+ .01) / 3.5 (no change) / 3.72 (+ .06)
I doubt we'll see law schools close.thelawyler wrote:Will we see scandals as law schools close where 1Ls and 2Ls who completed 1 or 2 years will be stuck without a school?
I wonder how many of them will be grateful...thelawyler wrote:Will we see scandals as law schools close where 1Ls and 2Ls who completed 1 or 2 years will be stuck without a school?
Here's a spreadsheet I'm working on if anyone wants to help. Since there are two threads going this would be a good place to gather all the data:superbloom wrote:Is someone/can someone keep the original tally going? It's been a while since the OP has been edited.
Their biglaw placement rate is basically zero. I don't remember the exact number but I think it's like 5 or 6% which should put them in TT category. Not to mention they are a full 10% below UA in terms of overall placement and have exactly one market to send grads to (Phoenix) which is neither big nor bustling.iMisto wrote:I understand ASU made a crazy jump in the rankings, and definitely shouldn't be listed above several schools (BU/BC/etc.), but what's with all the hate? Is it justified? Thaaaanks!
Gotcha. Thank you.2014 wrote:Their biglaw placement rate is basically zero. I don't remember the exact number but I think it's like 5 or 6% which should put them in TT category. Not to mention they are a full 10% below UA in terms of overall placement and have exactly one market to send grads to (Phoenix) which is neither big nor bustling.iMisto wrote:I understand ASU made a crazy jump in the rankings, and definitely shouldn't be listed above several schools (BU/BC/etc.), but what's with all the hate? Is it justified? Thaaaanks!
LSATSCORES2012 wrote:Here's a spreadsheet I'm working on if anyone wants to help. Since there are two threads going this would be a good place to gather all the data:superbloom wrote:Is someone/can someone keep the original tally going? It's been a while since the OP has been edited.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... kc1Q0ZnUnc
It's publicly editable, but if that becomes a problem I can always revert to previous versions and disable access... so please play nicely
That the Valvoline Dean is finding fewer warm bodies to populate his shit-mill is always great news.justonemoregame wrote:LSATSCORES2012 wrote:Here's a spreadsheet I'm working on if anyone wants to help. Since there are two threads going this would be a good place to gather all the data:superbloom wrote:Is someone/can someone keep the original tally going? It's been a while since the OP has been edited.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... kc1Q0ZnUnc
It's publicly editable, but if that becomes a problem I can always revert to previous versions and disable access... so please play nicely
Thank you for this -- I'll help out when I can. Another thing about Seton Hall - they had over 350 1Ls two years ago, so the reported numbers for this fall are very nice.
Thanks for this!!LSATSCORES2012 wrote:Here's a spreadsheet I'm working on if anyone wants to help. Since there are two threads going this would be a good place to gather all the data:superbloom wrote:Is someone/can someone keep the original tally going? It's been a while since the OP has been edited.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... kc1Q0ZnUnc
It's publicly editable, but if that becomes a problem I can always revert to previous versions and disable access... so please play nicely
Thank youLSATSCORES2012 wrote:Here's a spreadsheet I'm working on if anyone wants to help. Since there are two threads going this would be a good place to gather all the data:superbloom wrote:Is someone/can someone keep the original tally going? It's been a while since the OP has been edited.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc ... kc1Q0ZnUnc
It's publicly editable, but if that becomes a problem I can always revert to previous versions and disable access... so please play nicely